A catchment scale evaluation of the SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models

G Hancock, J Lowry, T Coulthard, Kenneth Evans, D Moliere

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Landscape evolution models provide a way to determine erosion rates and landscape stability over times scales from tens to thousands of years. The SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models both have the capability to simulate catchment–wide erosion and deposition over these time scales. They are both cellular, operate over a digital elevation model of the landscape, and represent fluvial and slope processes. However, they were initially developed to solve research questions at different time and space scales and subsequently the perspective, detail and process representation vary considerably between
    the models. Notably, CAESAR simulates individual events with a greater emphasis on fluvial processes whereas SIBERIA averages erosion rates across annual time scales. This paper describes how both models are applied to Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, where soil erosion rates have been closely monitored over the last 10 years. Results simulating 10 000 years of erosion are similar, yet also pick up subtle differences that indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two models. The results from both the SIBERIA and CAESAR models compare well with independent field data determined for the site over different time scales. Representative hillslope cross-sections are very similar between the models. Geomorphologically there was little difference
    between the modelled catchments after 1000 years but significant differences were revealed at longer simulation times. Importantly, both models show that they are sensitive to input parameters and that hydrology and erosion parameter derivation has long-term implications for sediment transport prediction. Therefore selection of input parameters is critical. This study also provides a good example of how different models may be better suited to different applications or research questions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)863-875
    Number of pages13
    JournalEarth Surface Processes and Landforms
    Volume35
    Issue number8
    Early online date5 May 2010
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

    Fingerprint

    landscape evolution
    catchment
    erosion
    evaluation
    erosion rate
    timescale
    fluvial process
    hillslope
    tin
    digital elevation model
    soil erosion
    sediment transport
    hydrology
    time
    cross section
    simulation
    event

    Cite this

    Hancock, G ; Lowry, J ; Coulthard, T ; Evans, Kenneth ; Moliere, D. / A catchment scale evaluation of the SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models. In: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 8. pp. 863-875.
    @article{aa5032f2c82c42b29a364a9b213f3c29,
    title = "A catchment scale evaluation of the SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models",
    abstract = "Landscape evolution models provide a way to determine erosion rates and landscape stability over times scales from tens to thousands of years. The SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models both have the capability to simulate catchment–wide erosion and deposition over these time scales. They are both cellular, operate over a digital elevation model of the landscape, and represent fluvial and slope processes. However, they were initially developed to solve research questions at different time and space scales and subsequently the perspective, detail and process representation vary considerably betweenthe models. Notably, CAESAR simulates individual events with a greater emphasis on fluvial processes whereas SIBERIA averages erosion rates across annual time scales. This paper describes how both models are applied to Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, where soil erosion rates have been closely monitored over the last 10 years. Results simulating 10 000 years of erosion are similar, yet also pick up subtle differences that indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two models. The results from both the SIBERIA and CAESAR models compare well with independent field data determined for the site over different time scales. Representative hillslope cross-sections are very similar between the models. Geomorphologically there was little differencebetween the modelled catchments after 1000 years but significant differences were revealed at longer simulation times. Importantly, both models show that they are sensitive to input parameters and that hydrology and erosion parameter derivation has long-term implications for sediment transport prediction. Therefore selection of input parameters is critical. This study also provides a good example of how different models may be better suited to different applications or research questions.",
    author = "G Hancock and J Lowry and T Coulthard and Kenneth Evans and D Moliere",
    year = "2010",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1002/esp.1863",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "863--875",
    journal = "Earth Surface Processes and Landforms",
    issn = "0197-9337",
    publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
    number = "8",

    }

    A catchment scale evaluation of the SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models. / Hancock, G; Lowry, J; Coulthard, T; Evans, Kenneth; Moliere, D.

    In: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 35, No. 8, 06.2010, p. 863-875.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A catchment scale evaluation of the SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models

    AU - Hancock, G

    AU - Lowry, J

    AU - Coulthard, T

    AU - Evans, Kenneth

    AU - Moliere, D

    PY - 2010/6

    Y1 - 2010/6

    N2 - Landscape evolution models provide a way to determine erosion rates and landscape stability over times scales from tens to thousands of years. The SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models both have the capability to simulate catchment–wide erosion and deposition over these time scales. They are both cellular, operate over a digital elevation model of the landscape, and represent fluvial and slope processes. However, they were initially developed to solve research questions at different time and space scales and subsequently the perspective, detail and process representation vary considerably betweenthe models. Notably, CAESAR simulates individual events with a greater emphasis on fluvial processes whereas SIBERIA averages erosion rates across annual time scales. This paper describes how both models are applied to Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, where soil erosion rates have been closely monitored over the last 10 years. Results simulating 10 000 years of erosion are similar, yet also pick up subtle differences that indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two models. The results from both the SIBERIA and CAESAR models compare well with independent field data determined for the site over different time scales. Representative hillslope cross-sections are very similar between the models. Geomorphologically there was little differencebetween the modelled catchments after 1000 years but significant differences were revealed at longer simulation times. Importantly, both models show that they are sensitive to input parameters and that hydrology and erosion parameter derivation has long-term implications for sediment transport prediction. Therefore selection of input parameters is critical. This study also provides a good example of how different models may be better suited to different applications or research questions.

    AB - Landscape evolution models provide a way to determine erosion rates and landscape stability over times scales from tens to thousands of years. The SIBERIA and CAESAR landscape evolution models both have the capability to simulate catchment–wide erosion and deposition over these time scales. They are both cellular, operate over a digital elevation model of the landscape, and represent fluvial and slope processes. However, they were initially developed to solve research questions at different time and space scales and subsequently the perspective, detail and process representation vary considerably betweenthe models. Notably, CAESAR simulates individual events with a greater emphasis on fluvial processes whereas SIBERIA averages erosion rates across annual time scales. This paper describes how both models are applied to Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, where soil erosion rates have been closely monitored over the last 10 years. Results simulating 10 000 years of erosion are similar, yet also pick up subtle differences that indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two models. The results from both the SIBERIA and CAESAR models compare well with independent field data determined for the site over different time scales. Representative hillslope cross-sections are very similar between the models. Geomorphologically there was little differencebetween the modelled catchments after 1000 years but significant differences were revealed at longer simulation times. Importantly, both models show that they are sensitive to input parameters and that hydrology and erosion parameter derivation has long-term implications for sediment transport prediction. Therefore selection of input parameters is critical. This study also provides a good example of how different models may be better suited to different applications or research questions.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954356190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/esp.1863

    DO - 10.1002/esp.1863

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 863

    EP - 875

    JO - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

    JF - Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

    SN - 0197-9337

    IS - 8

    ER -