A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology

Julian D. Olden, Mark J. Kennard, Bradley J. Pusey

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Hydrologic classification is one of the most widely applied tasks in ecohydrology. During the last two decades, a considerable effort has gone into analysis and development of methodological approaches to hydrologic classification. We reviewed the process of hydrologic classification, differentiating between an approach based on deductive reasoning using environmental regionalization, hydrologic regionalization and environmental classification whereby environmental variables assumed to be key determinants of hydrology are analysed and one based on inductive reasoning using streamflow classification whereby hydrologic data are analysed directly. We explored past applications in ecohydrology, highlighting the utility of classifications in the extrapolation of hydrologic information across sparsely gauged landscapes, the description of spatial patterns in hydrologic variability, aiding water resource management, and in the identification and prioritization of conservation areas. We introduce an overarching methodological framework that depicts critical components of the classification process and summarize important advantages and disadvantages of commonly used statistical approaches to characterize and predict hydrologic classes. Our hope is that researchers and managers will be better informed when having to make decisions regarding the selection and proper implementation of methods for hydrologic classification in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-518
Number of pages16
JournalEcohydrology
Volume5
Issue number4
Early online date30 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecohydrology
methodology
regionalization
hydrologic data
prioritization
stream flow
water management
hydrology
streamflow
protected area
conservation areas
managers
researchers
environmental factors

Cite this

@article{c23c14c2ccea4b21957ae3d5056b4893,
title = "A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology",
abstract = "Hydrologic classification is one of the most widely applied tasks in ecohydrology. During the last two decades, a considerable effort has gone into analysis and development of methodological approaches to hydrologic classification. We reviewed the process of hydrologic classification, differentiating between an approach based on deductive reasoning using environmental regionalization, hydrologic regionalization and environmental classification whereby environmental variables assumed to be key determinants of hydrology are analysed and one based on inductive reasoning using streamflow classification whereby hydrologic data are analysed directly. We explored past applications in ecohydrology, highlighting the utility of classifications in the extrapolation of hydrologic information across sparsely gauged landscapes, the description of spatial patterns in hydrologic variability, aiding water resource management, and in the identification and prioritization of conservation areas. We introduce an overarching methodological framework that depicts critical components of the classification process and summarize important advantages and disadvantages of commonly used statistical approaches to characterize and predict hydrologic classes. Our hope is that researchers and managers will be better informed when having to make decisions regarding the selection and proper implementation of methods for hydrologic classification in the future.",
keywords = "Dams, Environmental flow, Flow regime, Hydrologic metric, River regulation",
author = "Olden, {Julian D.} and Kennard, {Mark J.} and Pusey, {Bradley J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/eco.251",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "503--518",
journal = "Ecohydrology",
issn = "1936-0584",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "4",

}

A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology. / Olden, Julian D.; Kennard, Mark J.; Pusey, Bradley J.

In: Ecohydrology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 07.2012, p. 503-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology

AU - Olden, Julian D.

AU - Kennard, Mark J.

AU - Pusey, Bradley J.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Hydrologic classification is one of the most widely applied tasks in ecohydrology. During the last two decades, a considerable effort has gone into analysis and development of methodological approaches to hydrologic classification. We reviewed the process of hydrologic classification, differentiating between an approach based on deductive reasoning using environmental regionalization, hydrologic regionalization and environmental classification whereby environmental variables assumed to be key determinants of hydrology are analysed and one based on inductive reasoning using streamflow classification whereby hydrologic data are analysed directly. We explored past applications in ecohydrology, highlighting the utility of classifications in the extrapolation of hydrologic information across sparsely gauged landscapes, the description of spatial patterns in hydrologic variability, aiding water resource management, and in the identification and prioritization of conservation areas. We introduce an overarching methodological framework that depicts critical components of the classification process and summarize important advantages and disadvantages of commonly used statistical approaches to characterize and predict hydrologic classes. Our hope is that researchers and managers will be better informed when having to make decisions regarding the selection and proper implementation of methods for hydrologic classification in the future.

AB - Hydrologic classification is one of the most widely applied tasks in ecohydrology. During the last two decades, a considerable effort has gone into analysis and development of methodological approaches to hydrologic classification. We reviewed the process of hydrologic classification, differentiating between an approach based on deductive reasoning using environmental regionalization, hydrologic regionalization and environmental classification whereby environmental variables assumed to be key determinants of hydrology are analysed and one based on inductive reasoning using streamflow classification whereby hydrologic data are analysed directly. We explored past applications in ecohydrology, highlighting the utility of classifications in the extrapolation of hydrologic information across sparsely gauged landscapes, the description of spatial patterns in hydrologic variability, aiding water resource management, and in the identification and prioritization of conservation areas. We introduce an overarching methodological framework that depicts critical components of the classification process and summarize important advantages and disadvantages of commonly used statistical approaches to characterize and predict hydrologic classes. Our hope is that researchers and managers will be better informed when having to make decisions regarding the selection and proper implementation of methods for hydrologic classification in the future.

KW - Dams

KW - Environmental flow

KW - Flow regime

KW - Hydrologic metric

KW - River regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856795413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eco.251

DO - 10.1002/eco.251

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

SP - 503

EP - 518

JO - Ecohydrology

JF - Ecohydrology

SN - 1936-0584

IS - 4

ER -