A framework to audit intellectual capital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Until recently few firms have attempted to measure and assess Knowledge, the new intangible. Previous research shows that key components of intellectual capital are poorly understood, inadequately identified,inefficiently managed and inconsistently reported. Two types of audit are available: auditing by competence, and auditing individual or a spectrum of items. There are several methods for auditing these types, and selection depends both on the type of audit, and whether the aim is to quantify monetarily, to make comparisons, or to set benchmarks. A better way to approach the audit is to combine more than one method and audit object, so that any limitations imposed by one are compensated for by the other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Knowledge Management Practice
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Audit
Intellectual capital
Auditing
Benchmark
Intangibles

Cite this

@article{a8cf812d42e14d89be2703a1d4caeae4,
title = "A framework to audit intellectual capital",
abstract = "Until recently few firms have attempted to measure and assess Knowledge, the new intangible. Previous research shows that key components of intellectual capital are poorly understood, inadequately identified,inefficiently managed and inconsistently reported. Two types of audit are available: auditing by competence, and auditing individual or a spectrum of items. There are several methods for auditing these types, and selection depends both on the type of audit, and whether the aim is to quantify monetarily, to make comparisons, or to set benchmarks. A better way to approach the audit is to combine more than one method and audit object, so that any limitations imposed by one are compensated for by the other.",
author = "Indra Abeysekera",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Knowledge Management Practice",
issn = "1705-9232",

}

A framework to audit intellectual capital. / Abeysekera, Indra.

In: Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 2, 2001, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework to audit intellectual capital

AU - Abeysekera, Indra

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Until recently few firms have attempted to measure and assess Knowledge, the new intangible. Previous research shows that key components of intellectual capital are poorly understood, inadequately identified,inefficiently managed and inconsistently reported. Two types of audit are available: auditing by competence, and auditing individual or a spectrum of items. There are several methods for auditing these types, and selection depends both on the type of audit, and whether the aim is to quantify monetarily, to make comparisons, or to set benchmarks. A better way to approach the audit is to combine more than one method and audit object, so that any limitations imposed by one are compensated for by the other.

AB - Until recently few firms have attempted to measure and assess Knowledge, the new intangible. Previous research shows that key components of intellectual capital are poorly understood, inadequately identified,inefficiently managed and inconsistently reported. Two types of audit are available: auditing by competence, and auditing individual or a spectrum of items. There are several methods for auditing these types, and selection depends both on the type of audit, and whether the aim is to quantify monetarily, to make comparisons, or to set benchmarks. A better way to approach the audit is to combine more than one method and audit object, so that any limitations imposed by one are compensated for by the other.

UR - http://www.tlainc.com/jkmp.htm

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Knowledge Management Practice

JF - Journal of Knowledge Management Practice

SN - 1705-9232

ER -