A pilot project in distance education

Nurse practitioner students' experience of personal video capture technology as an assessment method of clinical skills

Haakan Strand, Stephanie Fox-Young, Phil Long, Fiona Bogossian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports on a pilot project aimed at exploring postgraduate distance students' experiences using personal video capture technology to complete competency assessments in physical examination. A pre-intervention survey gathered demographic data from nurse practitioner students (n = 31) and measured their information communication technology fluency. Subsequently, thirteen (13) students were allocated a hand held video camera to use in their clinical setting. Those participating in the trial completed a post-intervention survey and further data were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh et al., 2003) were used to guide the project. Uptake of the intervention was high (93%) as students recognised the potential benefit. Students were video recorded while performing physical examinations. They described high level of stress and some anxiety, which decreased rapidly while assessment was underway. Barriers experienced were in the areas of facilitating conditions (technical character e.g. upload of files) and social influence (e.g. local ethical approval). Students valued the opportunity to reflect on their recorded performance with their clinical mentors and by themselves. This project highlights the demands and difficulties of introducing technology to support work-based learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-257
Number of pages5
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Distance Education
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Clinical Competence
Nurse Practitioners
pilot project
nurse
video
Students
Technology
education
experience
student
Physical Examination
examination
Mentors
descriptive statistics
communication technology
content analysis
Anxiety
Hand

Cite this

@article{27968f22b28d433b9d7a811fdc639984,
title = "A pilot project in distance education: Nurse practitioner students' experience of personal video capture technology as an assessment method of clinical skills",
abstract = "This paper reports on a pilot project aimed at exploring postgraduate distance students' experiences using personal video capture technology to complete competency assessments in physical examination. A pre-intervention survey gathered demographic data from nurse practitioner students (n = 31) and measured their information communication technology fluency. Subsequently, thirteen (13) students were allocated a hand held video camera to use in their clinical setting. Those participating in the trial completed a post-intervention survey and further data were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh et al., 2003) were used to guide the project. Uptake of the intervention was high (93{\%}) as students recognised the potential benefit. Students were video recorded while performing physical examinations. They described high level of stress and some anxiety, which decreased rapidly while assessment was underway. Barriers experienced were in the areas of facilitating conditions (technical character e.g. upload of files) and social influence (e.g. local ethical approval). Students valued the opportunity to reflect on their recorded performance with their clinical mentors and by themselves. This project highlights the demands and difficulties of introducing technology to support work-based learning.",
keywords = "Assessment method, Clinical skills, Distance education, Nurse practitioner, Video",
author = "Haakan Strand and Stephanie Fox-Young and Phil Long and Fiona Bogossian",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.014",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "253--257",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

A pilot project in distance education : Nurse practitioner students' experience of personal video capture technology as an assessment method of clinical skills. / Strand, Haakan; Fox-Young, Stephanie; Long, Phil; Bogossian, Fiona.

In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 253-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pilot project in distance education

T2 - Nurse practitioner students' experience of personal video capture technology as an assessment method of clinical skills

AU - Strand, Haakan

AU - Fox-Young, Stephanie

AU - Long, Phil

AU - Bogossian, Fiona

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - This paper reports on a pilot project aimed at exploring postgraduate distance students' experiences using personal video capture technology to complete competency assessments in physical examination. A pre-intervention survey gathered demographic data from nurse practitioner students (n = 31) and measured their information communication technology fluency. Subsequently, thirteen (13) students were allocated a hand held video camera to use in their clinical setting. Those participating in the trial completed a post-intervention survey and further data were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh et al., 2003) were used to guide the project. Uptake of the intervention was high (93%) as students recognised the potential benefit. Students were video recorded while performing physical examinations. They described high level of stress and some anxiety, which decreased rapidly while assessment was underway. Barriers experienced were in the areas of facilitating conditions (technical character e.g. upload of files) and social influence (e.g. local ethical approval). Students valued the opportunity to reflect on their recorded performance with their clinical mentors and by themselves. This project highlights the demands and difficulties of introducing technology to support work-based learning.

AB - This paper reports on a pilot project aimed at exploring postgraduate distance students' experiences using personal video capture technology to complete competency assessments in physical examination. A pre-intervention survey gathered demographic data from nurse practitioner students (n = 31) and measured their information communication technology fluency. Subsequently, thirteen (13) students were allocated a hand held video camera to use in their clinical setting. Those participating in the trial completed a post-intervention survey and further data were gathered using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh et al., 2003) were used to guide the project. Uptake of the intervention was high (93%) as students recognised the potential benefit. Students were video recorded while performing physical examinations. They described high level of stress and some anxiety, which decreased rapidly while assessment was underway. Barriers experienced were in the areas of facilitating conditions (technical character e.g. upload of files) and social influence (e.g. local ethical approval). Students valued the opportunity to reflect on their recorded performance with their clinical mentors and by themselves. This project highlights the demands and difficulties of introducing technology to support work-based learning.

KW - Assessment method

KW - Clinical skills

KW - Distance education

KW - Nurse practitioner

KW - Video

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875272059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.014

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 253

EP - 257

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

IS - 3

ER -