A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art

Nicolas Bullot, Rolf Reber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Critics of the target article objected to our account of art appreciators' sensitivity to art-historical contexts and functions, the relations among the modes of artistic appreciation, and the weaknesses of aesthetic science. To rebut these objections and justify our program, we argue that the current neglect of sensitivity to art-historical contexts persists as a result of a pervasive aesthetic–artistic confound; we further specify our claim that basic exposure and the design stance are necessary conditions of artistic understanding; and we explain why many experimental studies do not belong to a psycho-historical science of art.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)163-180
    Number of pages18
    JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
    Issue number2
    Early online date18 Mar 2013
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this