A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art

Nicolas Bullot, Rolf Reber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Critics of the target article objected to our account of art appreciators' sensitivity to art-historical contexts and functions, the relations among the modes of artistic appreciation, and the weaknesses of aesthetic science. To rebut these objections and justify our program, we argue that the current neglect of sensitivity to art-historical contexts persists as a result of a pervasive aesthetic–artistic confound; we further specify our claim that basic exposure and the design stance are necessary conditions of artistic understanding; and we explain why many experimental studies do not belong to a psycho-historical science of art.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-180
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume36
Issue number2
Early online date18 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A psycho-historical research program for the integrative science of art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this