A random control trial of contrast baths and ICE baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union

Trevor R. Higgins, I. Tim Heazlewood, Mike Climstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Higgins, TR, Heazlewood, IT, and Climstein, M. A random control trial of contrast baths and ice baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union. J Strength Cond Res 25(4): 1046-1051, 2011-Players in team sports must recover in a relatively short period of time to perform at optimal levels. To enhance recovery, cryotherapy is widely used. To date, there are limited scientific data to support the use of cryotherapy for recovery. Players (n = 26) from a premier rugby club volunteered to participate in a random control trial (RCT) using contrast baths, ice baths, and no recovery. Statistical analysis, between group and within group, with repeated measures was conducted along with determination of effect sizes in 2 field tests. Pre and postfield tests including a 300-m test and a phosphate decrement test and subjective reports were conducted during the RCT. No significant difference was identified between base tests and retests in the phosphate decrement test or the 300-m tests. Effect size calculations identified a medium to large effect (d = 0.72) for 300-m tests for contrast baths against control. Trivial effects were identified for ice baths (d =0.17) in the 300-m test against control. Effect size calculations in the phosphate decrement test showed a trivial effect (d =0.18) contrast baths and a negative effect (d =-0.62) for ice baths. Treatment-treatment analysis identified a large effect for contrast baths (d = 0.99) in the phosphate decrement test and a medium effect for contrast baths (d = 0.53) in the 300-m test. Effect scores across contrast baths, ice baths, and passive recovery along with subjective reports indicate a trend toward contrast baths benefiting recovery in rugby. The continued use of 5-minute ice baths for recovery should be reconsidered based on this research because trends suggest a detrimental effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1046-1051
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Football
Baths
Ice
Phosphates
Cryotherapy
Contrast Media
Sports

Cite this

@article{1b9e326d348840d4b598882e06ee1f3b,
title = "A random control trial of contrast baths and ICE baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union",
abstract = "Higgins, TR, Heazlewood, IT, and Climstein, M. A random control trial of contrast baths and ice baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union. J Strength Cond Res 25(4): 1046-1051, 2011-Players in team sports must recover in a relatively short period of time to perform at optimal levels. To enhance recovery, cryotherapy is widely used. To date, there are limited scientific data to support the use of cryotherapy for recovery. Players (n = 26) from a premier rugby club volunteered to participate in a random control trial (RCT) using contrast baths, ice baths, and no recovery. Statistical analysis, between group and within group, with repeated measures was conducted along with determination of effect sizes in 2 field tests. Pre and postfield tests including a 300-m test and a phosphate decrement test and subjective reports were conducted during the RCT. No significant difference was identified between base tests and retests in the phosphate decrement test or the 300-m tests. Effect size calculations identified a medium to large effect (d = 0.72) for 300-m tests for contrast baths against control. Trivial effects were identified for ice baths (d =0.17) in the 300-m test against control. Effect size calculations in the phosphate decrement test showed a trivial effect (d =0.18) contrast baths and a negative effect (d =-0.62) for ice baths. Treatment-treatment analysis identified a large effect for contrast baths (d = 0.99) in the phosphate decrement test and a medium effect for contrast baths (d = 0.53) in the 300-m test. Effect scores across contrast baths, ice baths, and passive recovery along with subjective reports indicate a trend toward contrast baths benefiting recovery in rugby. The continued use of 5-minute ice baths for recovery should be reconsidered based on this research because trends suggest a detrimental effect.",
keywords = "Cryotherapy, Recovery, Team sports",
author = "Higgins, {Trevor R.} and Heazlewood, {I. Tim} and Mike Climstein",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc269f",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1046--1051",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "4",

}

A random control trial of contrast baths and ICE baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union. / Higgins, Trevor R.; Heazlewood, I. Tim; Climstein, Mike.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.04.2011, p. 1046-1051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A random control trial of contrast baths and ICE baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union

AU - Higgins, Trevor R.

AU - Heazlewood, I. Tim

AU - Climstein, Mike

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Higgins, TR, Heazlewood, IT, and Climstein, M. A random control trial of contrast baths and ice baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union. J Strength Cond Res 25(4): 1046-1051, 2011-Players in team sports must recover in a relatively short period of time to perform at optimal levels. To enhance recovery, cryotherapy is widely used. To date, there are limited scientific data to support the use of cryotherapy for recovery. Players (n = 26) from a premier rugby club volunteered to participate in a random control trial (RCT) using contrast baths, ice baths, and no recovery. Statistical analysis, between group and within group, with repeated measures was conducted along with determination of effect sizes in 2 field tests. Pre and postfield tests including a 300-m test and a phosphate decrement test and subjective reports were conducted during the RCT. No significant difference was identified between base tests and retests in the phosphate decrement test or the 300-m tests. Effect size calculations identified a medium to large effect (d = 0.72) for 300-m tests for contrast baths against control. Trivial effects were identified for ice baths (d =0.17) in the 300-m test against control. Effect size calculations in the phosphate decrement test showed a trivial effect (d =0.18) contrast baths and a negative effect (d =-0.62) for ice baths. Treatment-treatment analysis identified a large effect for contrast baths (d = 0.99) in the phosphate decrement test and a medium effect for contrast baths (d = 0.53) in the 300-m test. Effect scores across contrast baths, ice baths, and passive recovery along with subjective reports indicate a trend toward contrast baths benefiting recovery in rugby. The continued use of 5-minute ice baths for recovery should be reconsidered based on this research because trends suggest a detrimental effect.

AB - Higgins, TR, Heazlewood, IT, and Climstein, M. A random control trial of contrast baths and ice baths for recovery during competition in U/20 rugby union. J Strength Cond Res 25(4): 1046-1051, 2011-Players in team sports must recover in a relatively short period of time to perform at optimal levels. To enhance recovery, cryotherapy is widely used. To date, there are limited scientific data to support the use of cryotherapy for recovery. Players (n = 26) from a premier rugby club volunteered to participate in a random control trial (RCT) using contrast baths, ice baths, and no recovery. Statistical analysis, between group and within group, with repeated measures was conducted along with determination of effect sizes in 2 field tests. Pre and postfield tests including a 300-m test and a phosphate decrement test and subjective reports were conducted during the RCT. No significant difference was identified between base tests and retests in the phosphate decrement test or the 300-m tests. Effect size calculations identified a medium to large effect (d = 0.72) for 300-m tests for contrast baths against control. Trivial effects were identified for ice baths (d =0.17) in the 300-m test against control. Effect size calculations in the phosphate decrement test showed a trivial effect (d =0.18) contrast baths and a negative effect (d =-0.62) for ice baths. Treatment-treatment analysis identified a large effect for contrast baths (d = 0.99) in the phosphate decrement test and a medium effect for contrast baths (d = 0.53) in the 300-m test. Effect scores across contrast baths, ice baths, and passive recovery along with subjective reports indicate a trend toward contrast baths benefiting recovery in rugby. The continued use of 5-minute ice baths for recovery should be reconsidered based on this research because trends suggest a detrimental effect.

KW - Cryotherapy

KW - Recovery

KW - Team sports

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953837873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc269f

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc269f

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1046

EP - 1051

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 4

ER -