A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope

Suzanne K. Chambers; Lee Ritterband; Frances Thorndike; Lisa Nielsen; Joanne F. Aitken; Samantha Clutton; Paul Scuffham; Philippa Youl; Bronwyn Morris; Peter Baade; Jeffrey Dunn

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279

A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope

Suzanne K. Chambers, Lee Ritterband, Frances Thorndike, Lisa Nielsen, Joanne F. Aitken, Samantha Clutton, Paul Scuffham, Philippa Youl, Bronwyn Morris, Peter Baade, Jeffrey Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer.

Methods and analysis: In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer.

Trial registration number: ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).

Original language	English
Article number	e017279
Pages (from-to)	1-11
Number of pages	11
Journal	BMJ Open
Volume	7
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279Licence: CC BY-NC

10194819-oaFinal published version, 608 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{1eae1abf77cb46d59cbe951c333fe09d,

title = "A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope",

abstract = "Introduction: Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer. Methods and analysis: In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer. Trial registration number: ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).",

keywords = "mental health, oncology, public health",

author = "Chambers, {Suzanne K.} and Lee Ritterband and Frances Thorndike and Lisa Nielsen and Aitken, {Joanne F.} and Samantha Clutton and Paul Scuffham and Philippa Youl and Bronwyn Morris and Peter Baade and Jeffrey Dunn",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "1--11",

journal = "BMJ Open",

issn = "2044-6055",

publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group (BMJ Publishing)",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention

T2 - CancerCope

AU - Chambers, Suzanne K.

AU - Ritterband, Lee

AU - Thorndike, Frances

AU - Nielsen, Lisa

AU - Aitken, Joanne F.

AU - Clutton, Samantha

AU - Scuffham, Paul

AU - Youl, Philippa

AU - Morris, Bronwyn

AU - Baade, Peter

AU - Dunn, Jeffrey

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer. Methods and analysis: In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer. Trial registration number: ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).

AB - Introduction: Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer. Methods and analysis: In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer. Trial registration number: ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).

KW - mental health

KW - oncology

KW - public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021276608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279

M3 - Article

C2 - 28645985

AN - SCOPUS:85021276608

SN - 2044-6055

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

IS - 6

M1 - e017279

ER -

A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this