Aboriginal alcohol policy and practice in Australia

A case study of unintended consequences

Peter d'Abbs, Burlayn, Jamijin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines attempts by members of a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia, to control alcohol use, and the impact of policy decisions taken by national, territory and local governments on those attempts between 2007 and 2017. The Australian Government's main policy instrument for reducing alcohol-related harms from 2010 was the Alcohol Management Plan (AMP), officially defined as a plan, negotiated at a local community level with a high level of community input, for the effective management of alcohol use by the local community. The paper shows that the policy as implemented had the unintended consequence of undermining rather than enhancing the capacity of the community to act collectively in managing alcohol, largely as a result of the interactions of four sets of factors: (1) the policies as formulated; (2) actions taken to implement the policies, (3) the responses of those affected by the policies, and (4) the socio-ecological context in which these events occurred. The paper seeks to identify the processes through which these consequences were generated, and the implications for future policy-making, policy implementation and community-level initiatives for managing alcohol in Aboriginal communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-14
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume66
Issue numberApril
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Northern Territory
Local Government
Federal Government
Policy Making

Cite this

@article{5e6ee09a115d4b558c97e8e16463973c,
title = "Aboriginal alcohol policy and practice in Australia: A case study of unintended consequences",
abstract = "This paper examines attempts by members of a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia, to control alcohol use, and the impact of policy decisions taken by national, territory and local governments on those attempts between 2007 and 2017. The Australian Government's main policy instrument for reducing alcohol-related harms from 2010 was the Alcohol Management Plan (AMP), officially defined as a plan, negotiated at a local community level with a high level of community input, for the effective management of alcohol use by the local community. The paper shows that the policy as implemented had the unintended consequence of undermining rather than enhancing the capacity of the community to act collectively in managing alcohol, largely as a result of the interactions of four sets of factors: (1) the policies as formulated; (2) actions taken to implement the policies, (3) the responses of those affected by the policies, and (4) the socio-ecological context in which these events occurred. The paper seeks to identify the processes through which these consequences were generated, and the implications for future policy-making, policy implementation and community-level initiatives for managing alcohol in Aboriginal communities.",
keywords = "Alcohol policy outcomes, Indigenous alcohol policy, Policy implementation",
author = "Peter d'Abbs and Burlayn and Jamijin",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "9--14",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "April",

}

Aboriginal alcohol policy and practice in Australia : A case study of unintended consequences. / d'Abbs, Peter; Burlayn; Jamijin.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 66, No. April, 01.04.2019, p. 9-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aboriginal alcohol policy and practice in Australia

T2 - A case study of unintended consequences

AU - d'Abbs, Peter

AU - Burlayn,

AU - Jamijin,

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This paper examines attempts by members of a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia, to control alcohol use, and the impact of policy decisions taken by national, territory and local governments on those attempts between 2007 and 2017. The Australian Government's main policy instrument for reducing alcohol-related harms from 2010 was the Alcohol Management Plan (AMP), officially defined as a plan, negotiated at a local community level with a high level of community input, for the effective management of alcohol use by the local community. The paper shows that the policy as implemented had the unintended consequence of undermining rather than enhancing the capacity of the community to act collectively in managing alcohol, largely as a result of the interactions of four sets of factors: (1) the policies as formulated; (2) actions taken to implement the policies, (3) the responses of those affected by the policies, and (4) the socio-ecological context in which these events occurred. The paper seeks to identify the processes through which these consequences were generated, and the implications for future policy-making, policy implementation and community-level initiatives for managing alcohol in Aboriginal communities.

AB - This paper examines attempts by members of a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia, to control alcohol use, and the impact of policy decisions taken by national, territory and local governments on those attempts between 2007 and 2017. The Australian Government's main policy instrument for reducing alcohol-related harms from 2010 was the Alcohol Management Plan (AMP), officially defined as a plan, negotiated at a local community level with a high level of community input, for the effective management of alcohol use by the local community. The paper shows that the policy as implemented had the unintended consequence of undermining rather than enhancing the capacity of the community to act collectively in managing alcohol, largely as a result of the interactions of four sets of factors: (1) the policies as formulated; (2) actions taken to implement the policies, (3) the responses of those affected by the policies, and (4) the socio-ecological context in which these events occurred. The paper seeks to identify the processes through which these consequences were generated, and the implications for future policy-making, policy implementation and community-level initiatives for managing alcohol in Aboriginal communities.

KW - Alcohol policy outcomes

KW - Indigenous alcohol policy

KW - Policy implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060275655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 9

EP - 14

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

IS - April

ER -