Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing

A comprehensive literature review

Tamara L. Butler, Kate Anderson, Gail Garvey, Joan Cunningham, Julie Ratcliffe, Allison Tong, Lisa J. Whop, Alan Cass, Michelle Dickson, Kirsten Howard

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)138-157
    Number of pages20
    JournalSocial Science and Medicine
    Volume233
    Issue numberJuly
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

    Fingerprint

    Quality of Life
    quality of life
    Literature
    Spirituality
    Health
    gray literature
    Population Groups
    MEDLINE
    basic need
    Mental Health
    health
    spirituality
    empowerment
    Education
    autonomy
    mental health
    literature
    Torres Strait
    Well-being
    Literature Review

    Cite this

    Butler, Tamara L. ; Anderson, Kate ; Garvey, Gail ; Cunningham, Joan ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Tong, Allison ; Whop, Lisa J. ; Cass, Alan ; Dickson, Michelle ; Howard, Kirsten. / Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing : A comprehensive literature review. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 233, No. July. pp. 138-157.
    @article{1a10711515af491c800a7468a8710688,
    title = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing: A comprehensive literature review",
    abstract = "There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.",
    keywords = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australian, Comprehensive literature review, Domains, First Nations, Indigenous Australians, Quality of life, Wellbeing",
    author = "Butler, {Tamara L.} and Kate Anderson and Gail Garvey and Joan Cunningham and Julie Ratcliffe and Allison Tong and Whop, {Lisa J.} and Alan Cass and Michelle Dickson and Kirsten Howard",
    year = "2019",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "233",
    pages = "138--157",
    journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
    issn = "0277-9536",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "July",

    }

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing : A comprehensive literature review. / Butler, Tamara L.; Anderson, Kate; Garvey, Gail; Cunningham, Joan; Ratcliffe, Julie; Tong, Allison; Whop, Lisa J.; Cass, Alan; Dickson, Michelle; Howard, Kirsten.

    In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 233, No. July, 01.07.2019, p. 138-157.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing

    T2 - A comprehensive literature review

    AU - Butler, Tamara L.

    AU - Anderson, Kate

    AU - Garvey, Gail

    AU - Cunningham, Joan

    AU - Ratcliffe, Julie

    AU - Tong, Allison

    AU - Whop, Lisa J.

    AU - Cass, Alan

    AU - Dickson, Michelle

    AU - Howard, Kirsten

    PY - 2019/7/1

    Y1 - 2019/7/1

    N2 - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

    AB - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

    KW - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

    KW - Australian

    KW - Comprehensive literature review

    KW - Domains

    KW - First Nations

    KW - Indigenous Australians

    KW - Quality of life

    KW - Wellbeing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067086717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 233

    SP - 138

    EP - 157

    JO - Social Science and Medicine

    JF - Social Science and Medicine

    SN - 0277-9536

    IS - July

    ER -