Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing

A comprehensive literature review

Tamara L. Butler, Kate Anderson, Gail Garvey, Joan Cunningham, Julie Ratcliffe, Allison Tong, Lisa J. Whop, Alan Cass, Michelle Dickson, Kirsten Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-157
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume233
Issue numberJuly
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
quality of life
Literature
Spirituality
Health
gray literature
Population Groups
MEDLINE
basic need
Mental Health
health
spirituality
empowerment
Education
autonomy
mental health
literature
Torres Strait
Well-being
Literature Review

Cite this

Butler, Tamara L. ; Anderson, Kate ; Garvey, Gail ; Cunningham, Joan ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Tong, Allison ; Whop, Lisa J. ; Cass, Alan ; Dickson, Michelle ; Howard, Kirsten. / Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing : A comprehensive literature review. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 233, No. July. pp. 138-157.
@article{1a10711515af491c800a7468a8710688,
title = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing: A comprehensive literature review",
abstract = "There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.",
keywords = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australian, Comprehensive literature review, Domains, First Nations, Indigenous Australians, Quality of life, Wellbeing",
author = "Butler, {Tamara L.} and Kate Anderson and Gail Garvey and Joan Cunningham and Julie Ratcliffe and Allison Tong and Whop, {Lisa J.} and Alan Cass and Michelle Dickson and Kirsten Howard",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "233",
pages = "138--157",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "July",

}

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing : A comprehensive literature review. / Butler, Tamara L.; Anderson, Kate; Garvey, Gail; Cunningham, Joan; Ratcliffe, Julie; Tong, Allison; Whop, Lisa J.; Cass, Alan; Dickson, Michelle; Howard, Kirsten.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 233, No. July, 01.07.2019, p. 138-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing

T2 - A comprehensive literature review

AU - Butler, Tamara L.

AU - Anderson, Kate

AU - Garvey, Gail

AU - Cunningham, Joan

AU - Ratcliffe, Julie

AU - Tong, Allison

AU - Whop, Lisa J.

AU - Cass, Alan

AU - Dickson, Michelle

AU - Howard, Kirsten

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

AB - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.

KW - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

KW - Australian

KW - Comprehensive literature review

KW - Domains

KW - First Nations

KW - Indigenous Australians

KW - Quality of life

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067086717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004

M3 - Review article

VL - 233

SP - 138

EP - 157

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - July

ER -