Academic performance and institutional resources: a cross-country analysis of research universities

Domingo Docampo, Lawrence Cram

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Links between institutional academic performance and academic resources are of relevance for university managers, country officials and the public at large. This study aims to shed light on the issues using reliable data on research performance indicators as well as educational and resource indicators from research universities in Spain, Italy, Australia and Canada. The four countries selected for the study represent different academic traditions and belong to different geopolitical regions, yet they have relatively similar higher education systems in terms of student population, institutional resources and research production. Our study explores differences and similarities among them to better assess the performance of research universities from the four countries in a global context. The indicator set includes research production (number of indexed articles per year) and its quality (citation impact and number of highly cited papers), education production (full-time equivalent FTE student load and degree completions per year) and the resource base (annual ordinary expenditure and FTE number of faculty). We consider the raw indicators as well as a set of composite indicators normalised by measures of scale. Across the profile of universities in our complete sample, institutional size is the prime determinant of research production, with systematic differences in quality related to country, research intensity and resourcing level. Our data show that research universities allocate resources to research and education in country-specific and size-specific ways that are reflected in research performance.

    LanguageEnglish
    Pages739-764
    Number of pages26
    JournalScientometrics
    Volume110
    Issue number2
    Early online date28 Dec 2016
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    university
    resources
    performance
    Education
    Students
    education system
    education
    expenditures
    Italy
    Managers
    Spain
    student
    Canada
    manager
    determinants
    Composite materials

    Cite this

    @article{cc6dde1a5df34341b027d95058776030,
    title = "Academic performance and institutional resources: a cross-country analysis of research universities",
    abstract = "Links between institutional academic performance and academic resources are of relevance for university managers, country officials and the public at large. This study aims to shed light on the issues using reliable data on research performance indicators as well as educational and resource indicators from research universities in Spain, Italy, Australia and Canada. The four countries selected for the study represent different academic traditions and belong to different geopolitical regions, yet they have relatively similar higher education systems in terms of student population, institutional resources and research production. Our study explores differences and similarities among them to better assess the performance of research universities from the four countries in a global context. The indicator set includes research production (number of indexed articles per year) and its quality (citation impact and number of highly cited papers), education production (full-time equivalent FTE student load and degree completions per year) and the resource base (annual ordinary expenditure and FTE number of faculty). We consider the raw indicators as well as a set of composite indicators normalised by measures of scale. Across the profile of universities in our complete sample, institutional size is the prime determinant of research production, with systematic differences in quality related to country, research intensity and resourcing level. Our data show that research universities allocate resources to research and education in country-specific and size-specific ways that are reflected in research performance.",
    keywords = "Highly cited papers, International comparisons, Leiden ranking, Research intensive universities, Research performance, Shanghai ranking, Student population, University expenditures",
    author = "Domingo Docampo and Lawrence Cram",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1007/s11192-016-2189-6",
    language = "English",
    volume = "110",
    pages = "739--764",
    journal = "Scientometrics",
    issn = "0138-9130",
    publisher = "Akademiai Kiado Rt.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Academic performance and institutional resources : a cross-country analysis of research universities. / Docampo, Domingo; Cram, Lawrence.

    In: Scientometrics, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2017, p. 739-764.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Academic performance and institutional resources

    T2 - Scientometrics

    AU - Docampo,Domingo

    AU - Cram,Lawrence

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Links between institutional academic performance and academic resources are of relevance for university managers, country officials and the public at large. This study aims to shed light on the issues using reliable data on research performance indicators as well as educational and resource indicators from research universities in Spain, Italy, Australia and Canada. The four countries selected for the study represent different academic traditions and belong to different geopolitical regions, yet they have relatively similar higher education systems in terms of student population, institutional resources and research production. Our study explores differences and similarities among them to better assess the performance of research universities from the four countries in a global context. The indicator set includes research production (number of indexed articles per year) and its quality (citation impact and number of highly cited papers), education production (full-time equivalent FTE student load and degree completions per year) and the resource base (annual ordinary expenditure and FTE number of faculty). We consider the raw indicators as well as a set of composite indicators normalised by measures of scale. Across the profile of universities in our complete sample, institutional size is the prime determinant of research production, with systematic differences in quality related to country, research intensity and resourcing level. Our data show that research universities allocate resources to research and education in country-specific and size-specific ways that are reflected in research performance.

    AB - Links between institutional academic performance and academic resources are of relevance for university managers, country officials and the public at large. This study aims to shed light on the issues using reliable data on research performance indicators as well as educational and resource indicators from research universities in Spain, Italy, Australia and Canada. The four countries selected for the study represent different academic traditions and belong to different geopolitical regions, yet they have relatively similar higher education systems in terms of student population, institutional resources and research production. Our study explores differences and similarities among them to better assess the performance of research universities from the four countries in a global context. The indicator set includes research production (number of indexed articles per year) and its quality (citation impact and number of highly cited papers), education production (full-time equivalent FTE student load and degree completions per year) and the resource base (annual ordinary expenditure and FTE number of faculty). We consider the raw indicators as well as a set of composite indicators normalised by measures of scale. Across the profile of universities in our complete sample, institutional size is the prime determinant of research production, with systematic differences in quality related to country, research intensity and resourcing level. Our data show that research universities allocate resources to research and education in country-specific and size-specific ways that are reflected in research performance.

    KW - Highly cited papers

    KW - International comparisons

    KW - Leiden ranking

    KW - Research intensive universities

    KW - Research performance

    KW - Shanghai ranking

    KW - Student population

    KW - University expenditures

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007500677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11192-016-2189-6

    DO - 10.1007/s11192-016-2189-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 110

    SP - 739

    EP - 764

    JO - Scientometrics

    JF - Scientometrics

    SN - 0138-9130

    IS - 2

    ER -