Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend: Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings

Tina Lam, Rowan P. Ogeil, Jane Fischer, Richard Midford, Dan I. Lubman, William Gilmore, Tanya N. Chikritzhs, Wenbin Liang, Simon R. Lenton, Alexandra Aiken, Steve Allsop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Issues addressed: Adolescents under the legal purchase age primarily source their alcohol through social networks. This study assessed the provision context from the perspective of both underage recipients and their suppliers who were older peers and siblings.

Methods: Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted with 590 risky-drinking (50 g alcohol per session, at least monthly) adolescents. Participants of legal purchase age (18- to 19-year-olds; n = 269) reported their provision to 16- to 17-year-olds under eight scenarios. Those aged 14-17 (n = 321) reported receipt of alcohol under the same scenarios plus two parental supply contexts.

Results: Purchase-age participants reported supply: to an underage friend (67%), an acquaintance (44%) or a sibling (16%) to drink at the same party; to a friend (43%) or sibling (20%) to take to another party (20%) and to a stranger near a bottle shop (5%). Supply to a friend at the same party was more likely if money was exchanged (60% vs 40%; P < 0.001). Almost all (98%) 14- to 17-year-olds reported receiving alcohol from an adult (including 36% from a parent for consumption away from the parent), with a similar pattern of receipt scenarios as those reported by the 18- to 19-year-olds.

Conclusions: Provision of alcohol was more frequent with a friend than a sibling or stranger, in close environmental proximity, and if money was exchanged.

So what?: As supply may be sensitive to monetary considerations, the incidence of underage receipt may be affected by community-wide pricing measures. Traditional alcohol availability regulations should be supplemented by strategies relating to the social nature of supply and demand.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Promotion Journal of Australia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Siblings
Alcohols
Social Support
Alcohol Drinking
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis
Incidence

Cite this

Lam, Tina ; Ogeil, Rowan P. ; Fischer, Jane ; Midford, Richard ; Lubman, Dan I. ; Gilmore, William ; Chikritzhs, Tanya N. ; Liang, Wenbin ; Lenton, Simon R. ; Aiken, Alexandra ; Allsop, Steve. / Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend : Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings. In: Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2019 ; pp. 1-9.
@article{b5676d2fab314d1ca6aa6a5fa5d3a6e5,
title = "Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend: Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings",
abstract = "Issues addressed: Adolescents under the legal purchase age primarily source their alcohol through social networks. This study assessed the provision context from the perspective of both underage recipients and their suppliers who were older peers and siblings. Methods: Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted with 590 risky-drinking (50 g alcohol per session, at least monthly) adolescents. Participants of legal purchase age (18- to 19-year-olds; n = 269) reported their provision to 16- to 17-year-olds under eight scenarios. Those aged 14-17 (n = 321) reported receipt of alcohol under the same scenarios plus two parental supply contexts. Results: Purchase-age participants reported supply: to an underage friend (67{\%}), an acquaintance (44{\%}) or a sibling (16{\%}) to drink at the same party; to a friend (43{\%}) or sibling (20{\%}) to take to another party (20{\%}) and to a stranger near a bottle shop (5{\%}). Supply to a friend at the same party was more likely if money was exchanged (60{\%} vs 40{\%}; P < 0.001). Almost all (98{\%}) 14- to 17-year-olds reported receiving alcohol from an adult (including 36{\%} from a parent for consumption away from the parent), with a similar pattern of receipt scenarios as those reported by the 18- to 19-year-olds. Conclusions: Provision of alcohol was more frequent with a friend than a sibling or stranger, in close environmental proximity, and if money was exchanged. So what?: As supply may be sensitive to monetary considerations, the incidence of underage receipt may be affected by community-wide pricing measures. Traditional alcohol availability regulations should be supplemented by strategies relating to the social nature of supply and demand.",
keywords = "accessibility to minors, adolescents, alcohol availability, availability to minors, parental alcohol supply, risky single occasion drinking, secondary supply, social supply",
author = "Tina Lam and Ogeil, {Rowan P.} and Jane Fischer and Richard Midford and Lubman, {Dan I.} and William Gilmore and Chikritzhs, {Tanya N.} and Wenbin Liang and Lenton, {Simon R.} and Alexandra Aiken and Steve Allsop",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1002/hpja.264",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Health Promotion Journal of Australia",
issn = "1036-1073",
publisher = "Australian Health Promotion Association",

}

Lam, T, Ogeil, RP, Fischer, J, Midford, R, Lubman, DI, Gilmore, W, Chikritzhs, TN, Liang, W, Lenton, SR, Aiken, A & Allsop, S 2019, 'Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend: Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings' Health Promotion Journal of Australia, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.264

Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend : Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings. / Lam, Tina; Ogeil, Rowan P.; Fischer, Jane; Midford, Richard; Lubman, Dan I.; Gilmore, William; Chikritzhs, Tanya N.; Liang, Wenbin; Lenton, Simon R.; Aiken, Alexandra; Allsop, Steve.

In: Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 07.06.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alcohol supply as a favour for a friend

T2 - Scenarios of alcohol supply to younger friends and siblings

AU - Lam, Tina

AU - Ogeil, Rowan P.

AU - Fischer, Jane

AU - Midford, Richard

AU - Lubman, Dan I.

AU - Gilmore, William

AU - Chikritzhs, Tanya N.

AU - Liang, Wenbin

AU - Lenton, Simon R.

AU - Aiken, Alexandra

AU - Allsop, Steve

PY - 2019/6/7

Y1 - 2019/6/7

N2 - Issues addressed: Adolescents under the legal purchase age primarily source their alcohol through social networks. This study assessed the provision context from the perspective of both underage recipients and their suppliers who were older peers and siblings. Methods: Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted with 590 risky-drinking (50 g alcohol per session, at least monthly) adolescents. Participants of legal purchase age (18- to 19-year-olds; n = 269) reported their provision to 16- to 17-year-olds under eight scenarios. Those aged 14-17 (n = 321) reported receipt of alcohol under the same scenarios plus two parental supply contexts. Results: Purchase-age participants reported supply: to an underage friend (67%), an acquaintance (44%) or a sibling (16%) to drink at the same party; to a friend (43%) or sibling (20%) to take to another party (20%) and to a stranger near a bottle shop (5%). Supply to a friend at the same party was more likely if money was exchanged (60% vs 40%; P < 0.001). Almost all (98%) 14- to 17-year-olds reported receiving alcohol from an adult (including 36% from a parent for consumption away from the parent), with a similar pattern of receipt scenarios as those reported by the 18- to 19-year-olds. Conclusions: Provision of alcohol was more frequent with a friend than a sibling or stranger, in close environmental proximity, and if money was exchanged. So what?: As supply may be sensitive to monetary considerations, the incidence of underage receipt may be affected by community-wide pricing measures. Traditional alcohol availability regulations should be supplemented by strategies relating to the social nature of supply and demand.

AB - Issues addressed: Adolescents under the legal purchase age primarily source their alcohol through social networks. This study assessed the provision context from the perspective of both underage recipients and their suppliers who were older peers and siblings. Methods: Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted with 590 risky-drinking (50 g alcohol per session, at least monthly) adolescents. Participants of legal purchase age (18- to 19-year-olds; n = 269) reported their provision to 16- to 17-year-olds under eight scenarios. Those aged 14-17 (n = 321) reported receipt of alcohol under the same scenarios plus two parental supply contexts. Results: Purchase-age participants reported supply: to an underage friend (67%), an acquaintance (44%) or a sibling (16%) to drink at the same party; to a friend (43%) or sibling (20%) to take to another party (20%) and to a stranger near a bottle shop (5%). Supply to a friend at the same party was more likely if money was exchanged (60% vs 40%; P < 0.001). Almost all (98%) 14- to 17-year-olds reported receiving alcohol from an adult (including 36% from a parent for consumption away from the parent), with a similar pattern of receipt scenarios as those reported by the 18- to 19-year-olds. Conclusions: Provision of alcohol was more frequent with a friend than a sibling or stranger, in close environmental proximity, and if money was exchanged. So what?: As supply may be sensitive to monetary considerations, the incidence of underage receipt may be affected by community-wide pricing measures. Traditional alcohol availability regulations should be supplemented by strategies relating to the social nature of supply and demand.

KW - accessibility to minors

KW - adolescents

KW - alcohol availability

KW - availability to minors

KW - parental alcohol supply

KW - risky single occasion drinking

KW - secondary supply

KW - social supply

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068207202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpja.264

DO - 10.1002/hpja.264

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

JF - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

SN - 1036-1073

ER -