An operational model for implementing conservation action

Andrew Knight, Richard Cowling, Bruce Campbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The preoccupation of many conservation planners with the refinement of systematic assessment techniques has manifested an "implementation crisis" in conservation planning. This preoccupation has provided systematic assessments with well-tested tools (e.g., area selection algorithms) and principles (e.g., representation, complementarity), but our understanding of these techniques currently far exceeds our ability to apply them effectively to pragmatic conservation problems. The science is informative about where one needs to do conservation, but silent on how to achieve it. Operational models, defined as simplified conceptualizations of processes for implementing conservation action at priority conservation areas, are essential for guiding conservation planning initiatives because they assist understanding of how these processes function. Operational models developed to date have largely been linear, simplistic, and focused on the systematic assessment of biological entities. Experience in the real world indicates that operational models for conducting conservation planning initiatives should explicitly complement a systematic conservation assessment with activities that empower individuals and institutions (enabling) and explicitly aim to secure conservation action (implementation). Specifically, implementing effective conservation action requires that systematic assessments be integrated functionally with a process for developing an implementation strategy and processes for stakeholder collaboration while maintaining a broad focus on the implementation of conservation action. A suite of hallmarks define effective operational models (e.g., stakeholder collaboration, links with land-use planning, social learning, and action research). Greater development and testing of the practical application of operational models should lead to higher levels of effective implementation and alleviate the implementation crisis. Social learning institutions are essential for ensuring ongoing improvement in the development and application of operational models that deliver effective conservation action. � 2006 Society for Conservation Biology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)408-419
    Number of pages12
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    planning
    conservation planning
    stakeholders
    learning
    biological assessment
    land use planning
    stakeholder
    conservation areas
    complement
    action research
    complementarity
    Biological Sciences
    protected area
    methodology
    testing

    Cite this

    Knight, A., Cowling, R., & Campbell, B. (2006). An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology, 20(2), 408-419.
    Knight, Andrew ; Cowling, Richard ; Campbell, Bruce. / An operational model for implementing conservation action. In: Conservation Biology. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 408-419.
    @article{9ee139e8a075479ca2f99d441bd01529,
    title = "An operational model for implementing conservation action",
    abstract = "The preoccupation of many conservation planners with the refinement of systematic assessment techniques has manifested an {"}implementation crisis{"} in conservation planning. This preoccupation has provided systematic assessments with well-tested tools (e.g., area selection algorithms) and principles (e.g., representation, complementarity), but our understanding of these techniques currently far exceeds our ability to apply them effectively to pragmatic conservation problems. The science is informative about where one needs to do conservation, but silent on how to achieve it. Operational models, defined as simplified conceptualizations of processes for implementing conservation action at priority conservation areas, are essential for guiding conservation planning initiatives because they assist understanding of how these processes function. Operational models developed to date have largely been linear, simplistic, and focused on the systematic assessment of biological entities. Experience in the real world indicates that operational models for conducting conservation planning initiatives should explicitly complement a systematic conservation assessment with activities that empower individuals and institutions (enabling) and explicitly aim to secure conservation action (implementation). Specifically, implementing effective conservation action requires that systematic assessments be integrated functionally with a process for developing an implementation strategy and processes for stakeholder collaboration while maintaining a broad focus on the implementation of conservation action. A suite of hallmarks define effective operational models (e.g., stakeholder collaboration, links with land-use planning, social learning, and action research). Greater development and testing of the practical application of operational models should lead to higher levels of effective implementation and alleviate the implementation crisis. Social learning institutions are essential for ensuring ongoing improvement in the development and application of operational models that deliver effective conservation action. � 2006 Society for Conservation Biology.",
    keywords = "biodiversity, conservation planning, site selection, algorithm, environmental protection, legal aspect, methodology, organization and management, review, theoretical model, Algorithms, Conservation of Natural Resources, Models, Theoretical, Planning Techniques",
    author = "Andrew Knight and Richard Cowling and Bruce Campbell",
    year = "2006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "408--419",
    journal = "Conservation Biology",
    issn = "0888-8892",
    publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    Knight, A, Cowling, R & Campbell, B 2006, 'An operational model for implementing conservation action', Conservation Biology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 408-419.

    An operational model for implementing conservation action. / Knight, Andrew; Cowling, Richard; Campbell, Bruce.

    In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2006, p. 408-419.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An operational model for implementing conservation action

    AU - Knight, Andrew

    AU - Cowling, Richard

    AU - Campbell, Bruce

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - The preoccupation of many conservation planners with the refinement of systematic assessment techniques has manifested an "implementation crisis" in conservation planning. This preoccupation has provided systematic assessments with well-tested tools (e.g., area selection algorithms) and principles (e.g., representation, complementarity), but our understanding of these techniques currently far exceeds our ability to apply them effectively to pragmatic conservation problems. The science is informative about where one needs to do conservation, but silent on how to achieve it. Operational models, defined as simplified conceptualizations of processes for implementing conservation action at priority conservation areas, are essential for guiding conservation planning initiatives because they assist understanding of how these processes function. Operational models developed to date have largely been linear, simplistic, and focused on the systematic assessment of biological entities. Experience in the real world indicates that operational models for conducting conservation planning initiatives should explicitly complement a systematic conservation assessment with activities that empower individuals and institutions (enabling) and explicitly aim to secure conservation action (implementation). Specifically, implementing effective conservation action requires that systematic assessments be integrated functionally with a process for developing an implementation strategy and processes for stakeholder collaboration while maintaining a broad focus on the implementation of conservation action. A suite of hallmarks define effective operational models (e.g., stakeholder collaboration, links with land-use planning, social learning, and action research). Greater development and testing of the practical application of operational models should lead to higher levels of effective implementation and alleviate the implementation crisis. Social learning institutions are essential for ensuring ongoing improvement in the development and application of operational models that deliver effective conservation action. � 2006 Society for Conservation Biology.

    AB - The preoccupation of many conservation planners with the refinement of systematic assessment techniques has manifested an "implementation crisis" in conservation planning. This preoccupation has provided systematic assessments with well-tested tools (e.g., area selection algorithms) and principles (e.g., representation, complementarity), but our understanding of these techniques currently far exceeds our ability to apply them effectively to pragmatic conservation problems. The science is informative about where one needs to do conservation, but silent on how to achieve it. Operational models, defined as simplified conceptualizations of processes for implementing conservation action at priority conservation areas, are essential for guiding conservation planning initiatives because they assist understanding of how these processes function. Operational models developed to date have largely been linear, simplistic, and focused on the systematic assessment of biological entities. Experience in the real world indicates that operational models for conducting conservation planning initiatives should explicitly complement a systematic conservation assessment with activities that empower individuals and institutions (enabling) and explicitly aim to secure conservation action (implementation). Specifically, implementing effective conservation action requires that systematic assessments be integrated functionally with a process for developing an implementation strategy and processes for stakeholder collaboration while maintaining a broad focus on the implementation of conservation action. A suite of hallmarks define effective operational models (e.g., stakeholder collaboration, links with land-use planning, social learning, and action research). Greater development and testing of the practical application of operational models should lead to higher levels of effective implementation and alleviate the implementation crisis. Social learning institutions are essential for ensuring ongoing improvement in the development and application of operational models that deliver effective conservation action. � 2006 Society for Conservation Biology.

    KW - biodiversity

    KW - conservation planning

    KW - site selection

    KW - algorithm

    KW - environmental protection

    KW - legal aspect

    KW - methodology

    KW - organization and management

    KW - review

    KW - theoretical model

    KW - Algorithms

    KW - Conservation of Natural Resources

    KW - Models, Theoretical

    KW - Planning Techniques

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 408

    EP - 419

    JO - Conservation Biology

    JF - Conservation Biology

    SN - 0888-8892

    IS - 2

    ER -

    Knight A, Cowling R, Campbell B. An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology. 2006;20(2):408-419.