Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits australians find most attractive

Stephen T. Garnett, Gillian B. Ainsworth, Kerstin K. Zander

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Understanding what people like about birds can help target advocacy for bird conservation. However, testing preferences for characteristics of birds is methodologically challenging, with bias difficult to avoid. In this paper we test whether preferred characteristics of birds in general are shared by the individual bird species the same people nominate as being those they consider most attractive. We then compare these results with the birds which appear most frequently in the imagery of conservation advocates. Based on a choice model completed by 638 general public respondents from around Australia, we found a preference for small colourful birds with a melodious call. However, when the same people were asked which five birds they found most attractive, 48% named no more than three, mostly large well-known species. Images displayed by a leading Australian bird conservation organisation also favoured large colourful species. The choice model results suggest conservation advocates can promote a much wider range of bird types as flagships, particularly smaller species that might otherwise be neglected.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0199253
    Pages (from-to)1-17
    Number of pages17
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume13
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    Birds
    birds
    Conservation
    advocacy
    Imagery (Psychotherapy)
    testing

    Cite this

    @article{b1ae1065df4a4d08ac60e63886f1e51c,
    title = "Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits australians find most attractive",
    abstract = "Understanding what people like about birds can help target advocacy for bird conservation. However, testing preferences for characteristics of birds is methodologically challenging, with bias difficult to avoid. In this paper we test whether preferred characteristics of birds in general are shared by the individual bird species the same people nominate as being those they consider most attractive. We then compare these results with the birds which appear most frequently in the imagery of conservation advocates. Based on a choice model completed by 638 general public respondents from around Australia, we found a preference for small colourful birds with a melodious call. However, when the same people were asked which five birds they found most attractive, 48{\%} named no more than three, mostly large well-known species. Images displayed by a leading Australian bird conservation organisation also favoured large colourful species. The choice model results suggest conservation advocates can promote a much wider range of bird types as flagships, particularly smaller species that might otherwise be neglected.",
    author = "Garnett, {Stephen T.} and Ainsworth, {Gillian B.} and Zander, {Kerstin K.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0199253",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "1--17",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
    number = "6",

    }

    Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits australians find most attractive. / Garnett, Stephen T.; Ainsworth, Gillian B.; Zander, Kerstin K.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 6, e0199253, 01.06.2018, p. 1-17.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits australians find most attractive

    AU - Garnett, Stephen T.

    AU - Ainsworth, Gillian B.

    AU - Zander, Kerstin K.

    PY - 2018/6/1

    Y1 - 2018/6/1

    N2 - Understanding what people like about birds can help target advocacy for bird conservation. However, testing preferences for characteristics of birds is methodologically challenging, with bias difficult to avoid. In this paper we test whether preferred characteristics of birds in general are shared by the individual bird species the same people nominate as being those they consider most attractive. We then compare these results with the birds which appear most frequently in the imagery of conservation advocates. Based on a choice model completed by 638 general public respondents from around Australia, we found a preference for small colourful birds with a melodious call. However, when the same people were asked which five birds they found most attractive, 48% named no more than three, mostly large well-known species. Images displayed by a leading Australian bird conservation organisation also favoured large colourful species. The choice model results suggest conservation advocates can promote a much wider range of bird types as flagships, particularly smaller species that might otherwise be neglected.

    AB - Understanding what people like about birds can help target advocacy for bird conservation. However, testing preferences for characteristics of birds is methodologically challenging, with bias difficult to avoid. In this paper we test whether preferred characteristics of birds in general are shared by the individual bird species the same people nominate as being those they consider most attractive. We then compare these results with the birds which appear most frequently in the imagery of conservation advocates. Based on a choice model completed by 638 general public respondents from around Australia, we found a preference for small colourful birds with a melodious call. However, when the same people were asked which five birds they found most attractive, 48% named no more than three, mostly large well-known species. Images displayed by a leading Australian bird conservation organisation also favoured large colourful species. The choice model results suggest conservation advocates can promote a much wider range of bird types as flagships, particularly smaller species that might otherwise be neglected.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049216065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0199253

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0199253

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 1

    EP - 17

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 6

    M1 - e0199253

    ER -