Assessing Collaboration in a National Research Partnership in Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care: A Network Approach

F. C. Cunningham, V. Matthews, A. Sheahan, J. Bailie, R. S. Bailie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: The ABCD National Research Partnership was formed in mid-2010as a collaboration to harness the expertise, experiences and resources of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled peak bodies,government and research organisations to improve the quality of Indigenous primary health care. The aim of this study was to apply social network methods to assess collaboration and functioning of the Partnership at two time-points.

     
    Methods: A social network analysis (SNA) survey was conducted in early 2013, with a follow-up survey in mid-2014. In the two survey rounds, online surveys were emailed to one senior person of the organisation participating in the Partnership (2013: 14 organisations; 2014: 11 organisations). The surveys collected data on respondent perceptions of the Partnership as well as social network relationship data. Social network methods were used to apply standardised metrics to assess how well the partnership was functioning as a collaborative three years into its operation, and in its fourth year. 


    Results: Most respondents rated the Partnership as successful in progressing toward its goals. Network density and centrality scores show awell-connected partnership spanning different organisational types andstates/territories (Northern Territory, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, and Far-West New South Wales). High centrality scores reflect high connectivity between key hubs in the network, contributing toward the shared goal of improved Indigenous primary health care. Network diagrams show key structural positions by organisational type, the frequency and intensity of interactions and the strengths and potential vulnerabilities in the partnership network, with comparisons at two time points for the partnership. 


    Conclusions: The study found that the Partnership was effective in securing collaboration across its partners. Partners' contribution of resources reflected their active involvement. There was a high level of agreement on the achievement of the key goals of the Partnership, showing shared sense-making amongst partners. SNA tools assisted with monitoring the network over time to develop strategies supporting connections between partners for sustaining collaborative learning. Study findings identify successful approaches for a research partnership to improve quality of care in Indigenous primary healthcare and provide encouragement for wider applications for research partnerships and collaborations in Australia and internationally.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number182
    Pages (from-to)1-17
    Number of pages17
    JournalFrontiers in Public Health
    Volume6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Collaboration in a National Research Partnership in Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care: A Network Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this