Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students

Can we do it better?

Stephane Bouchoucha, Anna Wikander, Catherine Wilkin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Australian universities have traditionally been able to supplement clinical education, for undergraduate nursing courses, delivered on placement with weekly clinical teaching in the simulated environment. The Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCA) tool has been used in this simulated environment to assess clinical skills. Recently, however, online delivery of undergraduate nursing courses has become more common. The move from an internal mode of teaching to an online external mode is seen worldwide and poses challenges to staff and students as well as changing the teaching and learning culture of institutions ( Philip and Wozniak, 2009). This cultural shift and the resulting diminishing timeframe for students to acquire and practice simulated clinical skills imply that it may become necessary to rethink assessment forms such as the OSCA assessment.This study examines whether or not the OSCA tool developed by Bujack et al. (1991a) is the best tool to be used in this new context, where online teaching is supplemented by very short, annual, intensive periods of study. Skills acquisition theories dictate that time is required to produce an ideal skills acquisition environment ( Quinn, 2000) but the time constraints placed on students in such intensive periods of study could influence skills acquisition.This cross-sectional qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to collect data. 65% of the nursing faculty participated in the study. The teaching of the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) occurred on two campuses and staff from both areas participated. This group of nurse academics was employed across the range of academic levels (from lecturer to professor) at the University. Data analysis followed a generic thematic analysis framework.Findings in this study show that there are a variety of attitudes and underpinning beliefs amongst staff in relation to the OSCAs. Doubts were raised in regard to the suitability of the use of the OSCA tool in this setting. It also became apparent during this study that the OSCA tool possibly serves purposes other than an assessment tool. 

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)944-948
    Number of pages5
    JournalNurse Education Today
    Volume33
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

    Fingerprint

    Clinical Competence
    Teaching
    Students
    nursing
    student
    Nursing
    Nursing Faculties
    staff
    Nursing Education
    Focus Groups
    university teacher
    learning culture
    Cross-Sectional Studies
    Nurses
    Learning
    Interviews
    bachelor
    supplement
    data analysis
    nurse

    Cite this

    Bouchoucha, Stephane ; Wikander, Anna ; Wilkin, Catherine. / Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students : Can we do it better?. In: Nurse Education Today. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 9. pp. 944-948.
    @article{66fc27f4753946e4be39f4504e056922,
    title = "Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students: Can we do it better?",
    abstract = "Australian universities have traditionally been able to supplement clinical education, for undergraduate nursing courses, delivered on placement with weekly clinical teaching in the simulated environment. The Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCA) tool has been used in this simulated environment to assess clinical skills. Recently, however, online delivery of undergraduate nursing courses has become more common. The move from an internal mode of teaching to an online external mode is seen worldwide and poses challenges to staff and students as well as changing the teaching and learning culture of institutions ( Philip and Wozniak, 2009). This cultural shift and the resulting diminishing timeframe for students to acquire and practice simulated clinical skills imply that it may become necessary to rethink assessment forms such as the OSCA assessment.This study examines whether or not the OSCA tool developed by Bujack et al. (1991a) is the best tool to be used in this new context, where online teaching is supplemented by very short, annual, intensive periods of study. Skills acquisition theories dictate that time is required to produce an ideal skills acquisition environment ( Quinn, 2000) but the time constraints placed on students in such intensive periods of study could influence skills acquisition.This cross-sectional qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to collect data. 65{\%} of the nursing faculty participated in the study. The teaching of the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) occurred on two campuses and staff from both areas participated. This group of nurse academics was employed across the range of academic levels (from lecturer to professor) at the University. Data analysis followed a generic thematic analysis framework.Findings in this study show that there are a variety of attitudes and underpinning beliefs amongst staff in relation to the OSCAs. Doubts were raised in regard to the suitability of the use of the OSCA tool in this setting. It also became apparent during this study that the OSCA tool possibly serves purposes other than an assessment tool. ",
    keywords = "attitude, Australia, clinical competence, cross-sectional study, education, educational model, human, nursing education, nursing student, procedures, qualitative research, standards, time, Attitude, Clinical Competence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Distance, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Models, Educational, Nursing Education Research, Qualitative Research, Students, Nursing, Time Factors",
    author = "Stephane Bouchoucha and Anna Wikander and Catherine Wilkin",
    year = "2013",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "944--948",
    journal = "Nurse Education Today",
    issn = "0260-6917",
    publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
    number = "9",

    }

    Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students : Can we do it better? / Bouchoucha, Stephane; Wikander, Anna; Wilkin, Catherine.

    In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 33, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 944-948.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students

    T2 - Can we do it better?

    AU - Bouchoucha, Stephane

    AU - Wikander, Anna

    AU - Wilkin, Catherine

    PY - 2013/9

    Y1 - 2013/9

    N2 - Australian universities have traditionally been able to supplement clinical education, for undergraduate nursing courses, delivered on placement with weekly clinical teaching in the simulated environment. The Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCA) tool has been used in this simulated environment to assess clinical skills. Recently, however, online delivery of undergraduate nursing courses has become more common. The move from an internal mode of teaching to an online external mode is seen worldwide and poses challenges to staff and students as well as changing the teaching and learning culture of institutions ( Philip and Wozniak, 2009). This cultural shift and the resulting diminishing timeframe for students to acquire and practice simulated clinical skills imply that it may become necessary to rethink assessment forms such as the OSCA assessment.This study examines whether or not the OSCA tool developed by Bujack et al. (1991a) is the best tool to be used in this new context, where online teaching is supplemented by very short, annual, intensive periods of study. Skills acquisition theories dictate that time is required to produce an ideal skills acquisition environment ( Quinn, 2000) but the time constraints placed on students in such intensive periods of study could influence skills acquisition.This cross-sectional qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to collect data. 65% of the nursing faculty participated in the study. The teaching of the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) occurred on two campuses and staff from both areas participated. This group of nurse academics was employed across the range of academic levels (from lecturer to professor) at the University. Data analysis followed a generic thematic analysis framework.Findings in this study show that there are a variety of attitudes and underpinning beliefs amongst staff in relation to the OSCAs. Doubts were raised in regard to the suitability of the use of the OSCA tool in this setting. It also became apparent during this study that the OSCA tool possibly serves purposes other than an assessment tool. 

    AB - Australian universities have traditionally been able to supplement clinical education, for undergraduate nursing courses, delivered on placement with weekly clinical teaching in the simulated environment. The Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCA) tool has been used in this simulated environment to assess clinical skills. Recently, however, online delivery of undergraduate nursing courses has become more common. The move from an internal mode of teaching to an online external mode is seen worldwide and poses challenges to staff and students as well as changing the teaching and learning culture of institutions ( Philip and Wozniak, 2009). This cultural shift and the resulting diminishing timeframe for students to acquire and practice simulated clinical skills imply that it may become necessary to rethink assessment forms such as the OSCA assessment.This study examines whether or not the OSCA tool developed by Bujack et al. (1991a) is the best tool to be used in this new context, where online teaching is supplemented by very short, annual, intensive periods of study. Skills acquisition theories dictate that time is required to produce an ideal skills acquisition environment ( Quinn, 2000) but the time constraints placed on students in such intensive periods of study could influence skills acquisition.This cross-sectional qualitative study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to collect data. 65% of the nursing faculty participated in the study. The teaching of the Bachelor of Nursing (BN) occurred on two campuses and staff from both areas participated. This group of nurse academics was employed across the range of academic levels (from lecturer to professor) at the University. Data analysis followed a generic thematic analysis framework.Findings in this study show that there are a variety of attitudes and underpinning beliefs amongst staff in relation to the OSCAs. Doubts were raised in regard to the suitability of the use of the OSCA tool in this setting. It also became apparent during this study that the OSCA tool possibly serves purposes other than an assessment tool. 

    KW - attitude

    KW - Australia

    KW - clinical competence

    KW - cross-sectional study

    KW - education

    KW - educational model

    KW - human

    KW - nursing education

    KW - nursing student

    KW - procedures

    KW - qualitative research

    KW - standards

    KW - time

    KW - Attitude

    KW - Clinical Competence

    KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

    KW - Education, Distance

    KW - Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate

    KW - Educational Measurement

    KW - Humans

    KW - Models, Educational

    KW - Nursing Education Research

    KW - Qualitative Research

    KW - Students, Nursing

    KW - Time Factors

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883447412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 944

    EP - 948

    JO - Nurse Education Today

    JF - Nurse Education Today

    SN - 0260-6917

    IS - 9

    ER -