Asthma: Time to confront some inconvenient truths

Robert Hancox, Peter Le Souef, Gary Anderson, Helen Reddel, Anne Chang, Richard Beasley

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Abstract

    Despite major advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of asthma and improvements in management, the accompanying benefits from public health initiatives and clinical practice have arguably been less than expected. For example, there are no effective public health strategies or treatment regimes that reduce the risk of developing asthma or influence its natural history. These represent priority areas for future translational research, which would need to investigate genetic and environmental interactions and vaccine strategies. In terms of asthma management it is tempting to focus on novel drug therapies; however, a case can be made that the priority is to undertake research that leads to improvements in the use of existing treatments through public health and primary care initiatives. Guidelines represent an important component of this approach, with recommendations for asthma imbedded within respiratory guidelines that can be implemented in the developing world where other acute and chronic respiratory disorders are common. This approach offers the best opportunity to close the gap between what is currently achieved in asthma management and that which is potentially achievable. � 2009 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)194-201
    Number of pages8
    JournalRespirology
    Volume15
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2010

      Fingerprint

    Cite this

    Hancox, R., Le Souef, P., Anderson, G., Reddel, H., Chang, A., & Beasley, R. (2010). Asthma: Time to confront some inconvenient truths. Respirology, 15(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01700.x