Australian and New Zealand Indigenous mothers' report respect for smoking bans in homes

Marewa Glover, Anette Kira, Vanessa JOHNSTON, Natalie Walker, Ngiare Brown, David Thomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: There is limited data about the reasons behind residential rules to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure or the establishment or enforcement of such rules in Indigenous populations. 
    Aim: We aimed to gain an understanding of smokefree rules around Australian and New Zealand (NZ) Indigenous infants. 
    Method: This was a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial that aimed to test the efficacy of a family-centred tobacco control programme about environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to improve the respiratory health of Indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 Indigenous mothers of infants in Australia (. n=. 7) and NZ (. n=. 19). We asked about the presence of smokefree rules, who set the rules, how the rules were set and enforced, and presence of smokefree rules in participants' wider social circle. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and inductively analysed to identify key themes. Findings: Sixty-nine percent of mothers had partners, 77% smoked and all reported some presence of smokefree rules for house and car. Three main themes were identified: strategies to minimise exposure to ETS, establishing smokefree rules in homes and cars, and, adherence and enforcement of smokefree rules. Several strategies were identified to limit children's exposure to ETS, including rules to limit exposure to third-hand smoke. Mothers extended their smokefree rules to apply to other people's houses or cars, and reported that their family and social circles also had smokefree rules. The main reason for having smokefree rules was for the health of their children. Rules were most commonly set by the mother, often jointly with their partner. Few mothers reported challenges or problems with other people adhering to the smokefree rules. 
    Conclusion: Women tried very hard to, and believed that they were effective in, protecting their children from the harmful effects of ETS exposure. In this context, health professionals need to emphasise smoking cessation in parents, so that children are maximally protected from ETS exposure. 
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalWomen and Birth
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    New Zealand
    Smoke
    Tobacco
    Smoking
    Mothers
    Environmental Exposure
    Interviews
    Smoking Cessation
    Population Groups
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hand
    Parents
    Health

    Cite this

    Glover, Marewa ; Kira, Anette ; JOHNSTON, Vanessa ; Walker, Natalie ; Brown, Ngiare ; Thomas, David. / Australian and New Zealand Indigenous mothers' report respect for smoking bans in homes. In: Women and Birth. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 1-7.
    @article{2a777d1faa7741e59634d90007ef52a5,
    title = "Australian and New Zealand Indigenous mothers' report respect for smoking bans in homes",
    abstract = "Background: There is limited data about the reasons behind residential rules to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure or the establishment or enforcement of such rules in Indigenous populations. Aim: We aimed to gain an understanding of smokefree rules around Australian and New Zealand (NZ) Indigenous infants. Method: This was a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial that aimed to test the efficacy of a family-centred tobacco control programme about environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to improve the respiratory health of Indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 Indigenous mothers of infants in Australia (. n=. 7) and NZ (. n=. 19). We asked about the presence of smokefree rules, who set the rules, how the rules were set and enforced, and presence of smokefree rules in participants' wider social circle. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and inductively analysed to identify key themes. Findings: Sixty-nine percent of mothers had partners, 77{\%} smoked and all reported some presence of smokefree rules for house and car. Three main themes were identified: strategies to minimise exposure to ETS, establishing smokefree rules in homes and cars, and, adherence and enforcement of smokefree rules. Several strategies were identified to limit children's exposure to ETS, including rules to limit exposure to third-hand smoke. Mothers extended their smokefree rules to apply to other people's houses or cars, and reported that their family and social circles also had smokefree rules. The main reason for having smokefree rules was for the health of their children. Rules were most commonly set by the mother, often jointly with their partner. Few mothers reported challenges or problems with other people adhering to the smokefree rules. Conclusion: Women tried very hard to, and believed that they were effective in, protecting their children from the harmful effects of ETS exposure. In this context, health professionals need to emphasise smoking cessation in parents, so that children are maximally protected from ETS exposure. ",
    keywords = "adult, Article, Australian, child, child health, controlled study, environmental exposure, family centered care, female, home environment, human, indigenous people, maternal attitude, New Zealand, passive smoking, prevalence, priority journal, qualitative research, randomized controlled trial, semi structured interview, smoking ban, attitude to health, Australia, family, infant, mother, Oceanic ancestry group, prevention and control, procedures, smoking, smoking cessation, Adult, Child, Environmental Exposure, Family, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Infant, Mothers, Oceanic Ancestry Group, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Smoke Pollution",
    author = "Marewa Glover and Anette Kira and Vanessa JOHNSTON and Natalie Walker and Ngiare Brown and David Thomas",
    note = "NHMRC Grant # 545203",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2014.09.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "1--7",
    journal = "Women and Birth",
    issn = "1871-5192",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    Australian and New Zealand Indigenous mothers' report respect for smoking bans in homes. / Glover, Marewa; Kira, Anette; JOHNSTON, Vanessa; Walker, Natalie; Brown, Ngiare; Thomas, David.

    In: Women and Birth, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Australian and New Zealand Indigenous mothers' report respect for smoking bans in homes

    AU - Glover, Marewa

    AU - Kira, Anette

    AU - JOHNSTON, Vanessa

    AU - Walker, Natalie

    AU - Brown, Ngiare

    AU - Thomas, David

    N1 - NHMRC Grant # 545203

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Background: There is limited data about the reasons behind residential rules to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure or the establishment or enforcement of such rules in Indigenous populations. Aim: We aimed to gain an understanding of smokefree rules around Australian and New Zealand (NZ) Indigenous infants. Method: This was a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial that aimed to test the efficacy of a family-centred tobacco control programme about environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to improve the respiratory health of Indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 Indigenous mothers of infants in Australia (. n=. 7) and NZ (. n=. 19). We asked about the presence of smokefree rules, who set the rules, how the rules were set and enforced, and presence of smokefree rules in participants' wider social circle. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and inductively analysed to identify key themes. Findings: Sixty-nine percent of mothers had partners, 77% smoked and all reported some presence of smokefree rules for house and car. Three main themes were identified: strategies to minimise exposure to ETS, establishing smokefree rules in homes and cars, and, adherence and enforcement of smokefree rules. Several strategies were identified to limit children's exposure to ETS, including rules to limit exposure to third-hand smoke. Mothers extended their smokefree rules to apply to other people's houses or cars, and reported that their family and social circles also had smokefree rules. The main reason for having smokefree rules was for the health of their children. Rules were most commonly set by the mother, often jointly with their partner. Few mothers reported challenges or problems with other people adhering to the smokefree rules. Conclusion: Women tried very hard to, and believed that they were effective in, protecting their children from the harmful effects of ETS exposure. In this context, health professionals need to emphasise smoking cessation in parents, so that children are maximally protected from ETS exposure. 

    AB - Background: There is limited data about the reasons behind residential rules to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure or the establishment or enforcement of such rules in Indigenous populations. Aim: We aimed to gain an understanding of smokefree rules around Australian and New Zealand (NZ) Indigenous infants. Method: This was a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial that aimed to test the efficacy of a family-centred tobacco control programme about environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to improve the respiratory health of Indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 Indigenous mothers of infants in Australia (. n=. 7) and NZ (. n=. 19). We asked about the presence of smokefree rules, who set the rules, how the rules were set and enforced, and presence of smokefree rules in participants' wider social circle. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and inductively analysed to identify key themes. Findings: Sixty-nine percent of mothers had partners, 77% smoked and all reported some presence of smokefree rules for house and car. Three main themes were identified: strategies to minimise exposure to ETS, establishing smokefree rules in homes and cars, and, adherence and enforcement of smokefree rules. Several strategies were identified to limit children's exposure to ETS, including rules to limit exposure to third-hand smoke. Mothers extended their smokefree rules to apply to other people's houses or cars, and reported that their family and social circles also had smokefree rules. The main reason for having smokefree rules was for the health of their children. Rules were most commonly set by the mother, often jointly with their partner. Few mothers reported challenges or problems with other people adhering to the smokefree rules. Conclusion: Women tried very hard to, and believed that they were effective in, protecting their children from the harmful effects of ETS exposure. In this context, health professionals need to emphasise smoking cessation in parents, so that children are maximally protected from ETS exposure. 

    KW - adult

    KW - Article

    KW - Australian

    KW - child

    KW - child health

    KW - controlled study

    KW - environmental exposure

    KW - family centered care

    KW - female

    KW - home environment

    KW - human

    KW - indigenous people

    KW - maternal attitude

    KW - New Zealand

    KW - passive smoking

    KW - prevalence

    KW - priority journal

    KW - qualitative research

    KW - randomized controlled trial

    KW - semi structured interview

    KW - smoking ban

    KW - attitude to health

    KW - Australia

    KW - family

    KW - infant

    KW - mother

    KW - Oceanic ancestry group

    KW - prevention and control

    KW - procedures

    KW - smoking

    KW - smoking cessation

    KW - Adult

    KW - Child

    KW - Environmental Exposure

    KW - Family

    KW - Female

    KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

    KW - Humans

    KW - Infant

    KW - Mothers

    KW - Oceanic Ancestry Group

    KW - Smoking

    KW - Smoking Cessation

    KW - Tobacco Smoke Pollution

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923371928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.09.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.09.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 1

    EP - 7

    JO - Women and Birth

    JF - Women and Birth

    SN - 1871-5192

    IS - 1

    ER -