Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign

Donna L. Hartz, Jan White, Kathleen A. Lainchbury, Helen Gunn, Helen Jarman, Alec W. Welsh, Daniel Challis, Sally K. Tracy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The current Australian national maternity reform agenda focuses on improving access to maternity care for women and their families while preserving safety and quality. The caseload midwifery model of care offers the level of access to continuity of care proposed in the reforms however the introduction of these models in Australia continues to meet with strong resistance. In many places access to caseload midwifery care is offered as a token, usually restricted to well women, within limited metropolitan and regional facilities and where available, places for women are very small as a proportion of the total service provided. This case study outlines a major clinical redesign of midwifery care at a metropolitan tertiary referral maternity hospital in Sydney. Caseload midwifery care was introduced under randomised trial conditions to provide midwifery care to 1500 women of all risk resulting in half of the publicly insured women receiving midwifery group practice care. The paper describes the organisational quality and safety tools that were utilised to facilitate the process while discussing the factors that facilitated the process and the barriers that were encountered within the workforce, operational and political context. What is known about the topic? Caseload midwifery models of care have been established in a variety of community based and hospital settings throughout Australia with a reported reduction in clinical intervention rates while maintainning safety of mothers and babies. What does this paper add? This case study illustrates the strategies used to achieve a large sustainable clinical service redesign project based on the introduction of the caseload midwifery model of care. What are the implications for practitioners? Establishing midwifery group practice care within the mainstream maternity services has far reaching implications for the retention and recruitment of midwives and the improvement of clinical outcomes in childbirth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-175
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Health Review
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Group Practice
Safety
Maternity Hospitals
Continuity of Patient Care
Community Hospital
Tertiary Care Centers
Mothers
Parturition

Cite this

Hartz, D. L., White, J., Lainchbury, K. A., Gunn, H., Jarman, H., Welsh, A. W., ... Tracy, S. K. (2012). Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign. Australian Health Review, 36(2), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11012
Hartz, Donna L. ; White, Jan ; Lainchbury, Kathleen A. ; Gunn, Helen ; Jarman, Helen ; Welsh, Alec W. ; Challis, Daniel ; Tracy, Sally K. / Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign. In: Australian Health Review. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 169-175.
@article{28e9dcf761924865874b366720330126,
title = "Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign",
abstract = "The current Australian national maternity reform agenda focuses on improving access to maternity care for women and their families while preserving safety and quality. The caseload midwifery model of care offers the level of access to continuity of care proposed in the reforms however the introduction of these models in Australia continues to meet with strong resistance. In many places access to caseload midwifery care is offered as a token, usually restricted to well women, within limited metropolitan and regional facilities and where available, places for women are very small as a proportion of the total service provided. This case study outlines a major clinical redesign of midwifery care at a metropolitan tertiary referral maternity hospital in Sydney. Caseload midwifery care was introduced under randomised trial conditions to provide midwifery care to 1500 women of all risk resulting in half of the publicly insured women receiving midwifery group practice care. The paper describes the organisational quality and safety tools that were utilised to facilitate the process while discussing the factors that facilitated the process and the barriers that were encountered within the workforce, operational and political context. What is known about the topic? Caseload midwifery models of care have been established in a variety of community based and hospital settings throughout Australia with a reported reduction in clinical intervention rates while maintainning safety of mothers and babies. What does this paper add? This case study illustrates the strategies used to achieve a large sustainable clinical service redesign project based on the introduction of the caseload midwifery model of care. What are the implications for practitioners? Establishing midwifery group practice care within the mainstream maternity services has far reaching implications for the retention and recruitment of midwives and the improvement of clinical outcomes in childbirth.",
author = "Hartz, {Donna L.} and Jan White and Lainchbury, {Kathleen A.} and Helen Gunn and Helen Jarman and Welsh, {Alec W.} and Daniel Challis and Tracy, {Sally K.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1071/AH11012",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "169--175",
journal = "Australian Health Review",
issn = "1743-8462",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "2",

}

Hartz, DL, White, J, Lainchbury, KA, Gunn, H, Jarman, H, Welsh, AW, Challis, D & Tracy, SK 2012, 'Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign', Australian Health Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11012

Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign. / Hartz, Donna L.; White, Jan; Lainchbury, Kathleen A.; Gunn, Helen; Jarman, Helen; Welsh, Alec W.; Challis, Daniel; Tracy, Sally K.

In: Australian Health Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 04.05.2012, p. 169-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign

AU - Hartz, Donna L.

AU - White, Jan

AU - Lainchbury, Kathleen A.

AU - Gunn, Helen

AU - Jarman, Helen

AU - Welsh, Alec W.

AU - Challis, Daniel

AU - Tracy, Sally K.

PY - 2012/5/4

Y1 - 2012/5/4

N2 - The current Australian national maternity reform agenda focuses on improving access to maternity care for women and their families while preserving safety and quality. The caseload midwifery model of care offers the level of access to continuity of care proposed in the reforms however the introduction of these models in Australia continues to meet with strong resistance. In many places access to caseload midwifery care is offered as a token, usually restricted to well women, within limited metropolitan and regional facilities and where available, places for women are very small as a proportion of the total service provided. This case study outlines a major clinical redesign of midwifery care at a metropolitan tertiary referral maternity hospital in Sydney. Caseload midwifery care was introduced under randomised trial conditions to provide midwifery care to 1500 women of all risk resulting in half of the publicly insured women receiving midwifery group practice care. The paper describes the organisational quality and safety tools that were utilised to facilitate the process while discussing the factors that facilitated the process and the barriers that were encountered within the workforce, operational and political context. What is known about the topic? Caseload midwifery models of care have been established in a variety of community based and hospital settings throughout Australia with a reported reduction in clinical intervention rates while maintainning safety of mothers and babies. What does this paper add? This case study illustrates the strategies used to achieve a large sustainable clinical service redesign project based on the introduction of the caseload midwifery model of care. What are the implications for practitioners? Establishing midwifery group practice care within the mainstream maternity services has far reaching implications for the retention and recruitment of midwives and the improvement of clinical outcomes in childbirth.

AB - The current Australian national maternity reform agenda focuses on improving access to maternity care for women and their families while preserving safety and quality. The caseload midwifery model of care offers the level of access to continuity of care proposed in the reforms however the introduction of these models in Australia continues to meet with strong resistance. In many places access to caseload midwifery care is offered as a token, usually restricted to well women, within limited metropolitan and regional facilities and where available, places for women are very small as a proportion of the total service provided. This case study outlines a major clinical redesign of midwifery care at a metropolitan tertiary referral maternity hospital in Sydney. Caseload midwifery care was introduced under randomised trial conditions to provide midwifery care to 1500 women of all risk resulting in half of the publicly insured women receiving midwifery group practice care. The paper describes the organisational quality and safety tools that were utilised to facilitate the process while discussing the factors that facilitated the process and the barriers that were encountered within the workforce, operational and political context. What is known about the topic? Caseload midwifery models of care have been established in a variety of community based and hospital settings throughout Australia with a reported reduction in clinical intervention rates while maintainning safety of mothers and babies. What does this paper add? This case study illustrates the strategies used to achieve a large sustainable clinical service redesign project based on the introduction of the caseload midwifery model of care. What are the implications for practitioners? Establishing midwifery group practice care within the mainstream maternity services has far reaching implications for the retention and recruitment of midwives and the improvement of clinical outcomes in childbirth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861418062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/AH11012

DO - 10.1071/AH11012

M3 - Review article

VL - 36

SP - 169

EP - 175

JO - Australian Health Review

JF - Australian Health Review

SN - 1743-8462

IS - 2

ER -

Hartz DL, White J, Lainchbury KA, Gunn H, Jarman H, Welsh AW et al. Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign. Australian Health Review. 2012 May 4;36(2):169-175. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11012