Barriers to Improving the Environmental Performance of Construction Waste Management in Remote Communities

Robert H. Crawford, Deepika Mathur, Rolf Gerritsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    19 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The construction sector represents one of the most significant contributors to global waste production and is responsible for over 30% of the waste that ends up in landfill. Sending construction waste to landfill results in a broad range of environmental consequences including: degradation of land, habitat destruction, contamination of soil and groundwater, and release of methane. There is a growing awareness of the need to divert construction and demolition (C&D) waste from landfill for reuse or recycling. This helps maximise the value of the resources embodied in these materials and reduce the demand for virgin raw materials and the associated environment effects resulting from their extraction, processing and manufacture. However, diversion of C&D waste to reuse or recycling in remote communities can be difficult and costly. This poses a significant challenge for improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in these communities. A housing refurbishment project in Alice Springs, a remote town in central Australia, was used to identify the barriers associated with improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. This study considers the materials removed as part of the demolition phase of the project. Material types and quantities were documented and on-site and off-site waste management practices observed. Reasons for waste management decisions were recorded. The study identified a range of barriers to improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. These include cost and time associated with on-site waste management, industry culture, lack of education, competing project priorities, and lack of financial incentive. Greater incentives to encourage the diversion of C&D waste from landfill are needed, in particular. This and other strategies for improving construction waste management practices in remote communities must be targeted at the context of individual communities though, due to their unique characteristics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)830-837
    Number of pages8
    JournalProcedia Engineering
    Volume196
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    EventCreative Construction Conference 2017 - Primosten, Croatia
    Duration: 19 Jun 201722 Jun 2017
    Conference number: 5th
    http://2017.creative-construction-conference.com/

    Fingerprint

    Waste management
    Land fill
    Demolition
    Recycling
    Groundwater
    Raw materials
    Methane
    Contamination
    Education
    Soils
    Degradation
    Processing
    Costs
    Industry

    Cite this

    @article{a1428e9bca85472c9fbbd8e79bf52514,
    title = "Barriers to Improving the Environmental Performance of Construction Waste Management in Remote Communities",
    abstract = "The construction sector represents one of the most significant contributors to global waste production and is responsible for over 30{\%} of the waste that ends up in landfill. Sending construction waste to landfill results in a broad range of environmental consequences including: degradation of land, habitat destruction, contamination of soil and groundwater, and release of methane. There is a growing awareness of the need to divert construction and demolition (C&D) waste from landfill for reuse or recycling. This helps maximise the value of the resources embodied in these materials and reduce the demand for virgin raw materials and the associated environment effects resulting from their extraction, processing and manufacture. However, diversion of C&D waste to reuse or recycling in remote communities can be difficult and costly. This poses a significant challenge for improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in these communities. A housing refurbishment project in Alice Springs, a remote town in central Australia, was used to identify the barriers associated with improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. This study considers the materials removed as part of the demolition phase of the project. Material types and quantities were documented and on-site and off-site waste management practices observed. Reasons for waste management decisions were recorded. The study identified a range of barriers to improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. These include cost and time associated with on-site waste management, industry culture, lack of education, competing project priorities, and lack of financial incentive. Greater incentives to encourage the diversion of C&D waste from landfill are needed, in particular. This and other strategies for improving construction waste management practices in remote communities must be targeted at the context of individual communities though, due to their unique characteristics.",
    keywords = "Construction waste, environmental performance, recycling, remote communities, waste management",
    author = "Crawford, {Robert H.} and Deepika Mathur and Rolf Gerritsen",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "196",
    pages = "830--837",
    journal = "Procedia Engineering",
    issn = "1877-7058",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Barriers to Improving the Environmental Performance of Construction Waste Management in Remote Communities. / Crawford, Robert H.; Mathur, Deepika; Gerritsen, Rolf.

    In: Procedia Engineering, Vol. 196, 2017, p. 830-837.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Barriers to Improving the Environmental Performance of Construction Waste Management in Remote Communities

    AU - Crawford, Robert H.

    AU - Mathur, Deepika

    AU - Gerritsen, Rolf

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - The construction sector represents one of the most significant contributors to global waste production and is responsible for over 30% of the waste that ends up in landfill. Sending construction waste to landfill results in a broad range of environmental consequences including: degradation of land, habitat destruction, contamination of soil and groundwater, and release of methane. There is a growing awareness of the need to divert construction and demolition (C&D) waste from landfill for reuse or recycling. This helps maximise the value of the resources embodied in these materials and reduce the demand for virgin raw materials and the associated environment effects resulting from their extraction, processing and manufacture. However, diversion of C&D waste to reuse or recycling in remote communities can be difficult and costly. This poses a significant challenge for improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in these communities. A housing refurbishment project in Alice Springs, a remote town in central Australia, was used to identify the barriers associated with improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. This study considers the materials removed as part of the demolition phase of the project. Material types and quantities were documented and on-site and off-site waste management practices observed. Reasons for waste management decisions were recorded. The study identified a range of barriers to improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. These include cost and time associated with on-site waste management, industry culture, lack of education, competing project priorities, and lack of financial incentive. Greater incentives to encourage the diversion of C&D waste from landfill are needed, in particular. This and other strategies for improving construction waste management practices in remote communities must be targeted at the context of individual communities though, due to their unique characteristics.

    AB - The construction sector represents one of the most significant contributors to global waste production and is responsible for over 30% of the waste that ends up in landfill. Sending construction waste to landfill results in a broad range of environmental consequences including: degradation of land, habitat destruction, contamination of soil and groundwater, and release of methane. There is a growing awareness of the need to divert construction and demolition (C&D) waste from landfill for reuse or recycling. This helps maximise the value of the resources embodied in these materials and reduce the demand for virgin raw materials and the associated environment effects resulting from their extraction, processing and manufacture. However, diversion of C&D waste to reuse or recycling in remote communities can be difficult and costly. This poses a significant challenge for improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in these communities. A housing refurbishment project in Alice Springs, a remote town in central Australia, was used to identify the barriers associated with improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. This study considers the materials removed as part of the demolition phase of the project. Material types and quantities were documented and on-site and off-site waste management practices observed. Reasons for waste management decisions were recorded. The study identified a range of barriers to improving the environmental performance of construction waste management in remote communities. These include cost and time associated with on-site waste management, industry culture, lack of education, competing project priorities, and lack of financial incentive. Greater incentives to encourage the diversion of C&D waste from landfill are needed, in particular. This and other strategies for improving construction waste management practices in remote communities must be targeted at the context of individual communities though, due to their unique characteristics.

    KW - Construction waste

    KW - environmental performance

    KW - recycling

    KW - remote communities

    KW - waste management

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030462603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.014

    DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.014

    M3 - Article

    VL - 196

    SP - 830

    EP - 837

    JO - Procedia Engineering

    JF - Procedia Engineering

    SN - 1877-7058

    ER -