Between citizenship and human rights

the struggle for justice after Indonesia’s 1965 mass violence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since the authoritarian New Order regime ended in May 1998, human rights activists and survivors have campaigned for successive governments in Indonesia to address the needs of survivors of the 1965–1966 anti-communist violence. The article traces the changing strategies of activists and survivors in this campaign. In the early democratic period from 1998 to 2004, Indonesian activists sought to transform ideas of citizenship into an inclusive one, embracing and restoring the rights of former political prisoners. However, Indonesian government inaction on past human rights abuses forced them to reconsider their strategy. It propelled them back to a historical practice under the New Order of calling on external allies, including international human rights organizations, to highlight the state’s failure to protect citizens’ rights. The reliance on international partners and norms, however, also implies accepting a limitation on the ambition of human rights activism, since enforcement remains in national governments’ hands.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-190
Number of pages16
JournalCitizenship Studies
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

citizenship
human rights
violence
Indonesia
justice
political prisoner
allies
transform
abuse
campaign
regime
citizen

Cite this

@article{1f9d39aafb084f40964ac8172848e2f0,
title = "Between citizenship and human rights: the struggle for justice after Indonesia’s 1965 mass violence",
abstract = "Since the authoritarian New Order regime ended in May 1998, human rights activists and survivors have campaigned for successive governments in Indonesia to address the needs of survivors of the 1965–1966 anti-communist violence. The article traces the changing strategies of activists and survivors in this campaign. In the early democratic period from 1998 to 2004, Indonesian activists sought to transform ideas of citizenship into an inclusive one, embracing and restoring the rights of former political prisoners. However, Indonesian government inaction on past human rights abuses forced them to reconsider their strategy. It propelled them back to a historical practice under the New Order of calling on external allies, including international human rights organizations, to highlight the state’s failure to protect citizens’ rights. The reliance on international partners and norms, however, also implies accepting a limitation on the ambition of human rights activism, since enforcement remains in national governments’ hands.",
keywords = "Human rights, Citizenship, 1965 anti communist violence, Indonesia",
author = "Vannessa Hearman",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/13621025.2018.1445492",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "175--190",
journal = "Citizenship Studies",
issn = "1362-1025",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Between citizenship and human rights : the struggle for justice after Indonesia’s 1965 mass violence. / Hearman, Vannessa.

In: Citizenship Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, 08.04.2018, p. 175-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between citizenship and human rights

T2 - the struggle for justice after Indonesia’s 1965 mass violence

AU - Hearman, Vannessa

PY - 2018/4/8

Y1 - 2018/4/8

N2 - Since the authoritarian New Order regime ended in May 1998, human rights activists and survivors have campaigned for successive governments in Indonesia to address the needs of survivors of the 1965–1966 anti-communist violence. The article traces the changing strategies of activists and survivors in this campaign. In the early democratic period from 1998 to 2004, Indonesian activists sought to transform ideas of citizenship into an inclusive one, embracing and restoring the rights of former political prisoners. However, Indonesian government inaction on past human rights abuses forced them to reconsider their strategy. It propelled them back to a historical practice under the New Order of calling on external allies, including international human rights organizations, to highlight the state’s failure to protect citizens’ rights. The reliance on international partners and norms, however, also implies accepting a limitation on the ambition of human rights activism, since enforcement remains in national governments’ hands.

AB - Since the authoritarian New Order regime ended in May 1998, human rights activists and survivors have campaigned for successive governments in Indonesia to address the needs of survivors of the 1965–1966 anti-communist violence. The article traces the changing strategies of activists and survivors in this campaign. In the early democratic period from 1998 to 2004, Indonesian activists sought to transform ideas of citizenship into an inclusive one, embracing and restoring the rights of former political prisoners. However, Indonesian government inaction on past human rights abuses forced them to reconsider their strategy. It propelled them back to a historical practice under the New Order of calling on external allies, including international human rights organizations, to highlight the state’s failure to protect citizens’ rights. The reliance on international partners and norms, however, also implies accepting a limitation on the ambition of human rights activism, since enforcement remains in national governments’ hands.

KW - Human rights

KW - Citizenship

KW - 1965 anti communist violence

KW - Indonesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045477142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13621025.2018.1445492

DO - 10.1080/13621025.2018.1445492

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 175

EP - 190

JO - Citizenship Studies

JF - Citizenship Studies

SN - 1362-1025

IS - 2

ER -