Breaking the cycle: Effect of a multi-agency maternity service redesign on reducing the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander newborns in out-of-home care: A prospective, non-randomised, intervention study in urban Australia

Birri O'Dea, Yvette Roe, Yu Gao, Sue Kruske, Carmel Nelson, Sophie Hickey, Adrian Carson, Kristie Watego, Jody Currie, Renee Blackman, Maree Reynolds, Kay Wilson, Jo Costello, Sue Kildea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Strategies to reduce over-representation of Indigenous children in out-of-home care must start in pregnancy given Indigenous babies are 6 % of infants (<1 year), yet 43 % of infants in out-of-home care. 

Objective: To determine if an Indigenous-led, multi-agency, partnership redesign of maternity services decreases the likelihood of babies being removed at birth. Participants and setting: Women carrying an Indigenous baby/babies who gave birth at the Mater Mothers' Public Hospital, Brisbane (2013–2019).

Methods: A prospective, non-randomised, intervention trial evaluated a multi-agency service redesign. Women pregnant with an Indigenous baby birthing at a tertiary hospital were offered standard care or Birthing in Our Community (BiOC) service. We compared likelihood of babies being removed by Child Protection Services (CPS) at birth by model of care. Inverse probability of treatment propensity score weighting controlled baseline confounders and calculated treatment effect. Standardized differences were calculated to assess balance of risk factors for each copy of multiple imputation. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12618001365257. 

Results: In 2013–2019, 1988 women gave birth to 2044 Indigenous babies, with 40 women having babies removed at birth (9 BiOC, 31 standard care). Adjusted odds of baby removal were significantly lower for mothers in BiOC compared to standard care (AOR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.16, 0.84). In total, 2.0 % of Indigenous babies were removed by CPS; eight times higher than non-Indigenous babies at the same hospital (0.25 %). 

Conclusions: BiOC reduced removals of newborn Indigenous babies likely disrupting generational cycles of CPS contact, trauma, and maltreatment, and contributing to short and long-term health and wellbeing benefits for mothers and babies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106664
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume149
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking the cycle: Effect of a multi-agency maternity service redesign on reducing the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander newborns in out-of-home care: A prospective, non-randomised, intervention study in urban Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this