Breast screening attendance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the Northern Territory of Australia

Kriscia A. Tapia, Gail Garvey, Mark F. McEntee, Mary Rickard, Lorraine Lydiard, Patrick C. Brennan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare breast screening attendances of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women.

    Methods: A total of 4,093 BreastScreen cases were used including 857 self-identified Indigenous women. Chi-squared analysis compared data between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Logistic regression was used for groupings based on visits-to-screening frequency. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for associations with low attendance.

    Results: Indigenous women were younger and had fewer visits to screening compared with non-Indigenous women. Non-English speaking was mainly associated with fewer visits for Indigenous women only (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.9). Living remotely was associated with fewer visits for non-Indigenous women only (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.5). Shared predictors were younger age (OR 12.3, 95%CI 8.1-18.8; and OR 11.5, 95%CI 9.6-13.7, respectively) and having no family history of breast cancer (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.3; and OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.1, respectively).

    Conclusions: Factors associated with fewer visits to screening were similar for both groups of women, except for language which was significant only for Indigenous women, and remoteness which was significant only for non-Indigenous women. Implications for public health: Health communication in Indigenous languages may be key in encouraging participation and retaining Indigenous women in BreastScreen; improving access for remote-living non-Indigenous women should also be addressed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)334-339
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    Early online date3 Jul 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

    Fingerprint

    Northern Territory
    Breast
    Language
    Health Communication

    Cite this

    Tapia, Kriscia A. ; Garvey, Gail ; McEntee, Mark F. ; Rickard, Mary ; Lydiard, Lorraine ; Brennan, Patrick C. / Breast screening attendance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the Northern Territory of Australia. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 334-339.
    @article{3045ac2e12034c5fb1e358193d9642e3,
    title = "Breast screening attendance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the Northern Territory of Australia",
    abstract = "Objective: To compare breast screening attendances of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Methods: A total of 4,093 BreastScreen cases were used including 857 self-identified Indigenous women. Chi-squared analysis compared data between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Logistic regression was used for groupings based on visits-to-screening frequency. Odds ratios and 95{\%} confidence intervals were calculated for associations with low attendance. Results: Indigenous women were younger and had fewer visits to screening compared with non-Indigenous women. Non-English speaking was mainly associated with fewer visits for Indigenous women only (OR 1.9, 95{\%}CI 1.3-2.9). Living remotely was associated with fewer visits for non-Indigenous women only (OR 1.3, 95{\%}CI 1.1-1.5). Shared predictors were younger age (OR 12.3, 95{\%}CI 8.1-18.8; and OR 11.5, 95{\%}CI 9.6-13.7, respectively) and having no family history of breast cancer (OR 2.1, 95{\%}CI 1.3-3.3; and OR 1.8, 95{\%}CI 1.5-2.1, respectively). Conclusions: Factors associated with fewer visits to screening were similar for both groups of women, except for language which was significant only for Indigenous women, and remoteness which was significant only for non-Indigenous women. Implications for public health: Health communication in Indigenous languages may be key in encouraging participation and retaining Indigenous women in BreastScreen; improving access for remote-living non-Indigenous women should also be addressed.",
    keywords = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, breast cancer, participation, screening",
    author = "Tapia, {Kriscia A.} and Gail Garvey and McEntee, {Mark F.} and Mary Rickard and Lorraine Lydiard and Brennan, {Patrick C.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12917",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "334--339",
    journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
    issn = "1326-0200",
    publisher = "Public Health Association of Australia",
    number = "4",

    }

    Breast screening attendance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the Northern Territory of Australia. / Tapia, Kriscia A.; Garvey, Gail; McEntee, Mark F.; Rickard, Mary; Lydiard, Lorraine; Brennan, Patrick C.

    In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 334-339.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Breast screening attendance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the Northern Territory of Australia

    AU - Tapia, Kriscia A.

    AU - Garvey, Gail

    AU - McEntee, Mark F.

    AU - Rickard, Mary

    AU - Lydiard, Lorraine

    AU - Brennan, Patrick C.

    PY - 2019/8/1

    Y1 - 2019/8/1

    N2 - Objective: To compare breast screening attendances of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Methods: A total of 4,093 BreastScreen cases were used including 857 self-identified Indigenous women. Chi-squared analysis compared data between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Logistic regression was used for groupings based on visits-to-screening frequency. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for associations with low attendance. Results: Indigenous women were younger and had fewer visits to screening compared with non-Indigenous women. Non-English speaking was mainly associated with fewer visits for Indigenous women only (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.9). Living remotely was associated with fewer visits for non-Indigenous women only (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.5). Shared predictors were younger age (OR 12.3, 95%CI 8.1-18.8; and OR 11.5, 95%CI 9.6-13.7, respectively) and having no family history of breast cancer (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.3; and OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.1, respectively). Conclusions: Factors associated with fewer visits to screening were similar for both groups of women, except for language which was significant only for Indigenous women, and remoteness which was significant only for non-Indigenous women. Implications for public health: Health communication in Indigenous languages may be key in encouraging participation and retaining Indigenous women in BreastScreen; improving access for remote-living non-Indigenous women should also be addressed.

    AB - Objective: To compare breast screening attendances of Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Methods: A total of 4,093 BreastScreen cases were used including 857 self-identified Indigenous women. Chi-squared analysis compared data between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women. Logistic regression was used for groupings based on visits-to-screening frequency. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for associations with low attendance. Results: Indigenous women were younger and had fewer visits to screening compared with non-Indigenous women. Non-English speaking was mainly associated with fewer visits for Indigenous women only (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.9). Living remotely was associated with fewer visits for non-Indigenous women only (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.5). Shared predictors were younger age (OR 12.3, 95%CI 8.1-18.8; and OR 11.5, 95%CI 9.6-13.7, respectively) and having no family history of breast cancer (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.3; and OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.1, respectively). Conclusions: Factors associated with fewer visits to screening were similar for both groups of women, except for language which was significant only for Indigenous women, and remoteness which was significant only for non-Indigenous women. Implications for public health: Health communication in Indigenous languages may be key in encouraging participation and retaining Indigenous women in BreastScreen; improving access for remote-living non-Indigenous women should also be addressed.

    KW - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

    KW - breast cancer

    KW - participation

    KW - screening

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068530492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12917

    DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12917

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 334

    EP - 339

    JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

    SN - 1326-0200

    IS - 4

    ER -