Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?

Anne Oxbrough, Veronica French, Sandra Irwin, Thomas Kelly, Patrick Smiddy, John O'Halloran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Tree species composition is a key driver of forest biodiversity, influencing structural components of the environment from soil and litter to vegetation layers and the canopy, and ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling. Single species stands, particularly intensively managed monoculture plantations, are typically more homogenous in habitat structure and the biotic communities supported, than mixed stands. Thus, international forest policy increasingly promotes the establishment of mixed stands as an alternative to enhance biodiversity in plantations. Forests represent around 10% of the land area of Ireland, with most being monocultures of non-native conifers. By contrast, natural forest cover, primarily comprised of deciduous species, is just 1%. In recent years there has been an increase in mixed plantations; however, optimum tree species combinations, which aim to promote biodiversity under sustainable forest management, have yet to be established. Arthropods (ground-dwelling spiders and Carabid beetles, and night-flying macrolepidoptera) were examined in twenty mixed and monoculture plantations in Ireland (Norway spruce-oak mix, Norway spruce-Scots pine mix, Norway spruce monoculture). Both oak and Scots pine were secondary mix components, comprising between 15% and 40% of stems. Spiders and Carabid beetles were sampled using pitfall traps during summer 2008 and moths using light traps during summer and autumn 2008 and spring 2009.There was no evidence for an influence of oak or Scots pine on the arthropod fauna when they were a secondary component in a mix. Overall, arthropod communities were similar in species richness, assemblage structure and habitat specialists among the forest types. Furthermore, the mixed stands exhibited similar environmental conditions to monocultures in terms of stand structure, vegetation and litter cover. This suggests that there is limited biodiversity value from an additional canopy species comprising 15-40% of the mix, at least for the taxa and tree species studied here. This has implications for forest policy, where recommendations are often based on the proportion of each mix component, at least in terms of the potential biodiversity value of additional canopy species. Further research is required to determine the proportion at which oak or Scots pine begin to influence the arthropod fauna.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11-18
    Number of pages8
    JournalForest Ecology and Management
    Volume270
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2012

    Fingerprint

    forest plantations
    arthropod
    arthropods
    plantation
    Pinus sylvestris
    monoculture
    biodiversity
    mixed stands
    Quercus
    plantations
    Picea abies
    forest policy
    canopy
    Ireland
    Araneae
    fauna
    Coleoptera
    spider
    species diversity
    arthropod communities

    Cite this

    Oxbrough, A., French, V., Irwin, S., Kelly, T., Smiddy, P., & O'Halloran, J. (2012). Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests? Forest Ecology and Management, 270, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.006
    Oxbrough, Anne ; French, Veronica ; Irwin, Sandra ; Kelly, Thomas ; Smiddy, Patrick ; O'Halloran, John. / Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?. In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2012 ; Vol. 270. pp. 11-18.
    @article{97683dd0b83d410fa56e3169f3518b40,
    title = "Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?",
    abstract = "Tree species composition is a key driver of forest biodiversity, influencing structural components of the environment from soil and litter to vegetation layers and the canopy, and ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling. Single species stands, particularly intensively managed monoculture plantations, are typically more homogenous in habitat structure and the biotic communities supported, than mixed stands. Thus, international forest policy increasingly promotes the establishment of mixed stands as an alternative to enhance biodiversity in plantations. Forests represent around 10{\%} of the land area of Ireland, with most being monocultures of non-native conifers. By contrast, natural forest cover, primarily comprised of deciduous species, is just 1{\%}. In recent years there has been an increase in mixed plantations; however, optimum tree species combinations, which aim to promote biodiversity under sustainable forest management, have yet to be established. Arthropods (ground-dwelling spiders and Carabid beetles, and night-flying macrolepidoptera) were examined in twenty mixed and monoculture plantations in Ireland (Norway spruce-oak mix, Norway spruce-Scots pine mix, Norway spruce monoculture). Both oak and Scots pine were secondary mix components, comprising between 15{\%} and 40{\%} of stems. Spiders and Carabid beetles were sampled using pitfall traps during summer 2008 and moths using light traps during summer and autumn 2008 and spring 2009.There was no evidence for an influence of oak or Scots pine on the arthropod fauna when they were a secondary component in a mix. Overall, arthropod communities were similar in species richness, assemblage structure and habitat specialists among the forest types. Furthermore, the mixed stands exhibited similar environmental conditions to monocultures in terms of stand structure, vegetation and litter cover. This suggests that there is limited biodiversity value from an additional canopy species comprising 15-40{\%} of the mix, at least for the taxa and tree species studied here. This has implications for forest policy, where recommendations are often based on the proportion of each mix component, at least in terms of the potential biodiversity value of additional canopy species. Further research is required to determine the proportion at which oak or Scots pine begin to influence the arthropod fauna.",
    keywords = "Assemblage structure, Biodiversity values, Biotic community, Canopy species, Carabid beetle, Deciduous species, Ecosystem process, Environmental conditions, Forest biodiversity, Forest policy, Forest type, Habitat structures, Ireland, Land areas, Light trap, Litter cover, Mixed plantation, Mixed-species stands, Monoculture plantations, Moth, Natural forests, Non-native, Norway spruce, Nutrient cycling, Pitfall traps, Plantation forests, Scots pine, Secondary components, Single species, Species richness, Spider, Stand structures, Structural component, Sustainable forest management, Tree species, Tree species composition, Animals, Biodiversity, Ecosystems, Management, Vegetation, Forestry, arthropod, biodiversity, community composition, coniferous forest, deciduous forest, environmental conditions, forest cover, forest management, forestry policy, habitat structure, international law, litter, mixed forest, nutrient cycling, pitfall trap, plantation forestry, specialist, sustainable forestry, Forest Litter, Forest Management, Insects, Plantations, Plants, Species Identification, Araneae, Arthropoda, Carabidae, Coleoptera, Coniferophyta, Lepidoptera, Macrolepidoptera, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris",
    author = "Anne Oxbrough and Veronica French and Sandra Irwin and Thomas Kelly and Patrick Smiddy and John O'Halloran",
    year = "2012",
    month = "4",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "270",
    pages = "11--18",
    journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
    issn = "0378-1127",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Oxbrough, A, French, V, Irwin, S, Kelly, T, Smiddy, P & O'Halloran, J 2012, 'Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?', Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 270, pp. 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.006

    Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests? / Oxbrough, Anne; French, Veronica; Irwin, Sandra; Kelly, Thomas; Smiddy, Patrick; O'Halloran, John.

    In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 270, 15.04.2012, p. 11-18.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Can mixed species stands enhance arthropod diversity in plantation forests?

    AU - Oxbrough, Anne

    AU - French, Veronica

    AU - Irwin, Sandra

    AU - Kelly, Thomas

    AU - Smiddy, Patrick

    AU - O'Halloran, John

    PY - 2012/4/15

    Y1 - 2012/4/15

    N2 - Tree species composition is a key driver of forest biodiversity, influencing structural components of the environment from soil and litter to vegetation layers and the canopy, and ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling. Single species stands, particularly intensively managed monoculture plantations, are typically more homogenous in habitat structure and the biotic communities supported, than mixed stands. Thus, international forest policy increasingly promotes the establishment of mixed stands as an alternative to enhance biodiversity in plantations. Forests represent around 10% of the land area of Ireland, with most being monocultures of non-native conifers. By contrast, natural forest cover, primarily comprised of deciduous species, is just 1%. In recent years there has been an increase in mixed plantations; however, optimum tree species combinations, which aim to promote biodiversity under sustainable forest management, have yet to be established. Arthropods (ground-dwelling spiders and Carabid beetles, and night-flying macrolepidoptera) were examined in twenty mixed and monoculture plantations in Ireland (Norway spruce-oak mix, Norway spruce-Scots pine mix, Norway spruce monoculture). Both oak and Scots pine were secondary mix components, comprising between 15% and 40% of stems. Spiders and Carabid beetles were sampled using pitfall traps during summer 2008 and moths using light traps during summer and autumn 2008 and spring 2009.There was no evidence for an influence of oak or Scots pine on the arthropod fauna when they were a secondary component in a mix. Overall, arthropod communities were similar in species richness, assemblage structure and habitat specialists among the forest types. Furthermore, the mixed stands exhibited similar environmental conditions to monocultures in terms of stand structure, vegetation and litter cover. This suggests that there is limited biodiversity value from an additional canopy species comprising 15-40% of the mix, at least for the taxa and tree species studied here. This has implications for forest policy, where recommendations are often based on the proportion of each mix component, at least in terms of the potential biodiversity value of additional canopy species. Further research is required to determine the proportion at which oak or Scots pine begin to influence the arthropod fauna.

    AB - Tree species composition is a key driver of forest biodiversity, influencing structural components of the environment from soil and litter to vegetation layers and the canopy, and ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling. Single species stands, particularly intensively managed monoculture plantations, are typically more homogenous in habitat structure and the biotic communities supported, than mixed stands. Thus, international forest policy increasingly promotes the establishment of mixed stands as an alternative to enhance biodiversity in plantations. Forests represent around 10% of the land area of Ireland, with most being monocultures of non-native conifers. By contrast, natural forest cover, primarily comprised of deciduous species, is just 1%. In recent years there has been an increase in mixed plantations; however, optimum tree species combinations, which aim to promote biodiversity under sustainable forest management, have yet to be established. Arthropods (ground-dwelling spiders and Carabid beetles, and night-flying macrolepidoptera) were examined in twenty mixed and monoculture plantations in Ireland (Norway spruce-oak mix, Norway spruce-Scots pine mix, Norway spruce monoculture). Both oak and Scots pine were secondary mix components, comprising between 15% and 40% of stems. Spiders and Carabid beetles were sampled using pitfall traps during summer 2008 and moths using light traps during summer and autumn 2008 and spring 2009.There was no evidence for an influence of oak or Scots pine on the arthropod fauna when they were a secondary component in a mix. Overall, arthropod communities were similar in species richness, assemblage structure and habitat specialists among the forest types. Furthermore, the mixed stands exhibited similar environmental conditions to monocultures in terms of stand structure, vegetation and litter cover. This suggests that there is limited biodiversity value from an additional canopy species comprising 15-40% of the mix, at least for the taxa and tree species studied here. This has implications for forest policy, where recommendations are often based on the proportion of each mix component, at least in terms of the potential biodiversity value of additional canopy species. Further research is required to determine the proportion at which oak or Scots pine begin to influence the arthropod fauna.

    KW - Assemblage structure

    KW - Biodiversity values

    KW - Biotic community

    KW - Canopy species

    KW - Carabid beetle

    KW - Deciduous species

    KW - Ecosystem process

    KW - Environmental conditions

    KW - Forest biodiversity

    KW - Forest policy

    KW - Forest type

    KW - Habitat structures

    KW - Ireland

    KW - Land areas

    KW - Light trap

    KW - Litter cover

    KW - Mixed plantation

    KW - Mixed-species stands

    KW - Monoculture plantations

    KW - Moth

    KW - Natural forests

    KW - Non-native

    KW - Norway spruce

    KW - Nutrient cycling

    KW - Pitfall traps

    KW - Plantation forests

    KW - Scots pine

    KW - Secondary components

    KW - Single species

    KW - Species richness

    KW - Spider

    KW - Stand structures

    KW - Structural component

    KW - Sustainable forest management

    KW - Tree species

    KW - Tree species composition

    KW - Animals

    KW - Biodiversity

    KW - Ecosystems

    KW - Management

    KW - Vegetation

    KW - Forestry

    KW - arthropod

    KW - biodiversity

    KW - community composition

    KW - coniferous forest

    KW - deciduous forest

    KW - environmental conditions

    KW - forest cover

    KW - forest management

    KW - forestry policy

    KW - habitat structure

    KW - international law

    KW - litter

    KW - mixed forest

    KW - nutrient cycling

    KW - pitfall trap

    KW - plantation forestry

    KW - specialist

    KW - sustainable forestry

    KW - Forest Litter

    KW - Forest Management

    KW - Insects

    KW - Plantations

    KW - Plants

    KW - Species Identification

    KW - Araneae

    KW - Arthropoda

    KW - Carabidae

    KW - Coleoptera

    KW - Coniferophyta

    KW - Lepidoptera

    KW - Macrolepidoptera

    KW - Picea abies

    KW - Pinus sylvestris

    U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 270

    SP - 11

    EP - 18

    JO - Forest Ecology and Management

    JF - Forest Ecology and Management

    SN - 0378-1127

    ER -