'Censorship = mission impossible?': a postcolonial same sex erotic discourse on Hong Kong porn law

Man Chung Chiu

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Abstract

    Hong Kong mainstream anti-porn activists adopt the Anglo-American radical feminist perspective on pornography, and support the establishment of censorship mechanism. The ideology, which assumes an essential textual interpretation of pornographic materials, is, however, politicized and destablized by postmodern strategy of multiple reading which emphasizes the significance of the interaction between reader's subjectivities and 'discourses'. By embedding the 'anti-porn vs. anti-censor' debate within the particular socio-legal-historical context of Hong Kong, where (Han-)Chinese paradigm on sexuality is still influential, the author argues that legal definition of 'obscenity/pornography' was/is not an indigenous (Han-) Chinese cultural product and it is in this context where censorship marginalizes and pathologizes local traditions on sexuality and thus (re)engineer and reinstate legal postcolonialism. The author further uses (Han-)Chinese conventional opposite/same sex erotic literature as illustrations to elaborate why pornography cannot be viewed as a monolithic and universal concept, and in what ways resistances against heterosexist patriarchal hegemony can be developed within the discourse of 'pornography'. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)39-63
    Number of pages25
    JournalInternational Journal of the Sociology of Law
    Volume32
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Censorship = mission impossible?': a postcolonial same sex erotic discourse on Hong Kong porn law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this