Challenges for valuing ecosystem services from an Indigenous estate in northern Australia

Kamaljit K. Sangha, Jeremy Russell-Smith, Scott C. Morrison, Robert Costanza, Andrew Edwards

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Recent Australian government policy for developing northern Australia applies a standard financial approach that disregards the importance of Ecosystem Services (ES), and the significance of associated socio-cultural benefits of ES for the wellbeing of Indigenous people who constitute the majority of the regional rural population. First, we assess available ES valuation methods for estimating non-market and market values of ES from an Indigenous estate, Fish River Station (FRS), representative of ‘typical’ regional savannas. Second, we estimate the direct (fire and weed management) and indirect (foregone income from pastoral enterprise) costs associated with maintaining those services. For valuation of ES, we applied a conventional Basic Value Transfer technique using global databases including available regional studies—providing valuations of USD 286 and 84 M y−1, respectively. However, constituent studies used in these valuations had limited relevance to both the ecosystems and socio-cultural contexts of our study. For evaluating Indigenous socio-ecological benefits of ES, estimated conservatively at USD 2.21 M y−1, we applied a local wellbeing valuation technique. The minimum costs required to maintain ES flows were estimated as USD 5.6 ha−1 y−1. Our study illustrates that, to better inform regional development policy, significant challenges remain for appropriate valuation of ES from north Australian savannas, including recognition of socio-cultural services and wellbeing benefits incorporating Indigenous values.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)167-178
    Number of pages12
    JournalEcosystem Services
    Volume25
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

    ecosystem service
    ecosystem services
    Ecosystem
    valuation
    savanna
    savannas
    market value
    indigenous peoples
    development policy
    rural population
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    value
    Policy Making
    regional development
    cost
    Rural Population
    weed
    weed control
    Rivers
    costs

    Cite this

    @article{8ed92ca17e5c49bb83794ad7937dc5fa,
    title = "Challenges for valuing ecosystem services from an Indigenous estate in northern Australia",
    abstract = "Recent Australian government policy for developing northern Australia applies a standard financial approach that disregards the importance of Ecosystem Services (ES), and the significance of associated socio-cultural benefits of ES for the wellbeing of Indigenous people who constitute the majority of the regional rural population. First, we assess available ES valuation methods for estimating non-market and market values of ES from an Indigenous estate, Fish River Station (FRS), representative of ‘typical’ regional savannas. Second, we estimate the direct (fire and weed management) and indirect (foregone income from pastoral enterprise) costs associated with maintaining those services. For valuation of ES, we applied a conventional Basic Value Transfer technique using global databases including available regional studies—providing valuations of USD 286 and 84 M y−1, respectively. However, constituent studies used in these valuations had limited relevance to both the ecosystems and socio-cultural contexts of our study. For evaluating Indigenous socio-ecological benefits of ES, estimated conservatively at USD 2.21 M y−1, we applied a local wellbeing valuation technique. The minimum costs required to maintain ES flows were estimated as USD 5.6 ha−1 y−1. Our study illustrates that, to better inform regional development policy, significant challenges remain for appropriate valuation of ES from north Australian savannas, including recognition of socio-cultural services and wellbeing benefits incorporating Indigenous values.",
    keywords = "Ecosystem services, Fish River Station, Indigenous capabilities, Indigenous values, Northern Australia, Savanna ecosystems",
    author = "Sangha, {Kamaljit K.} and Jeremy Russell-Smith and Morrison, {Scott C.} and Robert Costanza and Andrew Edwards",
    year = "2017",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "167--178",
    journal = "Ecosystem Services",
    issn = "2212-0416",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Challenges for valuing ecosystem services from an Indigenous estate in northern Australia. / Sangha, Kamaljit K.; Russell-Smith, Jeremy; Morrison, Scott C.; Costanza, Robert; Edwards, Andrew.

    In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 25, 06.2017, p. 167-178.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Challenges for valuing ecosystem services from an Indigenous estate in northern Australia

    AU - Sangha, Kamaljit K.

    AU - Russell-Smith, Jeremy

    AU - Morrison, Scott C.

    AU - Costanza, Robert

    AU - Edwards, Andrew

    PY - 2017/6

    Y1 - 2017/6

    N2 - Recent Australian government policy for developing northern Australia applies a standard financial approach that disregards the importance of Ecosystem Services (ES), and the significance of associated socio-cultural benefits of ES for the wellbeing of Indigenous people who constitute the majority of the regional rural population. First, we assess available ES valuation methods for estimating non-market and market values of ES from an Indigenous estate, Fish River Station (FRS), representative of ‘typical’ regional savannas. Second, we estimate the direct (fire and weed management) and indirect (foregone income from pastoral enterprise) costs associated with maintaining those services. For valuation of ES, we applied a conventional Basic Value Transfer technique using global databases including available regional studies—providing valuations of USD 286 and 84 M y−1, respectively. However, constituent studies used in these valuations had limited relevance to both the ecosystems and socio-cultural contexts of our study. For evaluating Indigenous socio-ecological benefits of ES, estimated conservatively at USD 2.21 M y−1, we applied a local wellbeing valuation technique. The minimum costs required to maintain ES flows were estimated as USD 5.6 ha−1 y−1. Our study illustrates that, to better inform regional development policy, significant challenges remain for appropriate valuation of ES from north Australian savannas, including recognition of socio-cultural services and wellbeing benefits incorporating Indigenous values.

    AB - Recent Australian government policy for developing northern Australia applies a standard financial approach that disregards the importance of Ecosystem Services (ES), and the significance of associated socio-cultural benefits of ES for the wellbeing of Indigenous people who constitute the majority of the regional rural population. First, we assess available ES valuation methods for estimating non-market and market values of ES from an Indigenous estate, Fish River Station (FRS), representative of ‘typical’ regional savannas. Second, we estimate the direct (fire and weed management) and indirect (foregone income from pastoral enterprise) costs associated with maintaining those services. For valuation of ES, we applied a conventional Basic Value Transfer technique using global databases including available regional studies—providing valuations of USD 286 and 84 M y−1, respectively. However, constituent studies used in these valuations had limited relevance to both the ecosystems and socio-cultural contexts of our study. For evaluating Indigenous socio-ecological benefits of ES, estimated conservatively at USD 2.21 M y−1, we applied a local wellbeing valuation technique. The minimum costs required to maintain ES flows were estimated as USD 5.6 ha−1 y−1. Our study illustrates that, to better inform regional development policy, significant challenges remain for appropriate valuation of ES from north Australian savannas, including recognition of socio-cultural services and wellbeing benefits incorporating Indigenous values.

    KW - Ecosystem services

    KW - Fish River Station

    KW - Indigenous capabilities

    KW - Indigenous values

    KW - Northern Australia

    KW - Savanna ecosystems

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018739093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.013

    DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.013

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 167

    EP - 178

    JO - Ecosystem Services

    JF - Ecosystem Services

    SN - 2212-0416

    ER -