TY - JOUR
T1 - Clicks and comments
T2 - Representation of wildlife crime in Pakistan in social media posts
AU - Haq, Rehan Ul
AU - Abdulabad, Arooj
AU - Asghar, Sobia
AU - Szabo, Judit K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was approved by the Board of Studies of the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. The authors would like to thank Azan Karam, Department of Zoology, Jahanzeb College Swat, and Prof. Dr. Zulfiqar Ali from the Institute of Zoology, University of the Punjab for their valuable insights and help with species identification. Also, Mr. Syed Ghulam Mohayud Din Hashmi from the Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore for guidance in the spatial analysis, and Mr. Muhammad Ajmal for assisting in creating maps. We also appreciate comments by two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor, which have improved the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - To evaluate the online presence of wildlife crime and the public's reaction to these crimes, we collected data on species, locations, animal status, and motives of wildlife crime depicted on nine Pakistani Facebook pages and eight groups from January 2016 to May 2021. We categorized reactions to images depicting birds, mammals, and reptiles and applied generalized linear models to the total number of reactions on posts. In 594 relevant posts, we identified 10,644 animals of 138 species. Common Krait (Bungarus caeruleus) had the highest number of posts, followed by Grey Francolin (Ortygornis pondicerianus) and Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus). The number of posts has generally increased, particularly after the Covid-19 lockdown in March 2020. Almost 66 % of the posts showed animals being killed, 27 % were captured with no visible signs of torture, and the rest showed visible signs of torture in captivity. The most common reason for wildlife crimes was illegal hunting, followed by fear and illegal trade. Most victims of illegal hunting were birds, while reptiles were predominantly killed for fear. However, illegal trade was affecting all three classes of animals. Killed or tortured animals received more reactions than non-tortured animals, as well as more comments both against and in favor of the crime. Crimes against reptiles received more pro-crime comments than birds and mammals. Our results reflect the importance of social media to monitor wildlife crimes. Urgent actions are necessary by the relevant authorities to improve management and strengthen the response of law enforcement to wildlife crime.
AB - To evaluate the online presence of wildlife crime and the public's reaction to these crimes, we collected data on species, locations, animal status, and motives of wildlife crime depicted on nine Pakistani Facebook pages and eight groups from January 2016 to May 2021. We categorized reactions to images depicting birds, mammals, and reptiles and applied generalized linear models to the total number of reactions on posts. In 594 relevant posts, we identified 10,644 animals of 138 species. Common Krait (Bungarus caeruleus) had the highest number of posts, followed by Grey Francolin (Ortygornis pondicerianus) and Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus). The number of posts has generally increased, particularly after the Covid-19 lockdown in March 2020. Almost 66 % of the posts showed animals being killed, 27 % were captured with no visible signs of torture, and the rest showed visible signs of torture in captivity. The most common reason for wildlife crimes was illegal hunting, followed by fear and illegal trade. Most victims of illegal hunting were birds, while reptiles were predominantly killed for fear. However, illegal trade was affecting all three classes of animals. Killed or tortured animals received more reactions than non-tortured animals, as well as more comments both against and in favor of the crime. Crimes against reptiles received more pro-crime comments than birds and mammals. Our results reflect the importance of social media to monitor wildlife crimes. Urgent actions are necessary by the relevant authorities to improve management and strengthen the response of law enforcement to wildlife crime.
KW - Comment analysis
KW - Facebook
KW - Online monitoring
KW - Reactions
KW - Social media
KW - Wildlife crime
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152268328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02473
DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02473
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152268328
SN - 2351-9894
VL - 43
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Global Ecology and Conservation
JF - Global Ecology and Conservation
M1 - e02473
ER -