Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children

SJ Gardiner, Anne Chang, Julie Marchant, Helen Petsky

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Cough in children is a commonly experienced symptom that is associated with increased health service utilisation and burden to parents. The presence of chronic (equal to or more than four weeks) cough in children may indicate a serious underlying condition such as inhaled foreign body or bronchiectasis. Codeine (and derivative)-based medications are sometimes used to treat cough due to their antitussive properties. However, there are inherent risks associated with the use of these medications such as respiratory drive suppression, anaesthetic-induced anaphylaxis, and addiction. Metabolic response and dosage variability place children at increased risk of experiencing such side effects. A systematic review evaluating the quality of the available literature would be useful to inform management practices.

    Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of codeine (and derivatives) in the treatment of chronic cough in children. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),MEDLINE (1946 to 8 June 2016), EMBASE (1974 to 8 June 2016), the online trials registries of the World Health Organization and Clinical- Trials.gov, and the bibliographic references of publications. We imposed no language restrictions.

    Selection criteria:
    We considered studies eligible for analysis when: the participant population included children aged less than 18 years with chronic
    cough (duration equal to or more than four weeks at the time of intervention); and the study design evaluated codeine or codeinebased derivatives against placebo through a randomised controlled trial.

    Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened the search results to determine eligibility against a standardised criteria, and we had a preplanned method for analysis.

    Main results: We identified a total of 556 records, of which 486 records were excluded on the basis of title and abstract. We retrieved the remaining
    70 references in full to determine eligibility. No studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this review, and thus we found no evidence to support or oppose the use of codeine or derivatives as antitussive agents for chronic cough in children.
    While chronic cough is not the same as acute cough, systematic reviews on the use of codeine efficacy for acute cough in children conclude an overall lack of evidence to support or oppose the use of over-the-counter cough and cold medications containing codeine (or derivatives) for treatment of acute cough in children. The lack of sufficient evidence to support the use of thesemedications has been consistently reaffirmed by medical experts in international chronic cough guidelines and by governing medical and pharmaceutical authorities in the USA, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Due to the lack of sufficient evidence to support efficacy, and the known risks associated with use - in particular the increased risks for children - these medications are now not recommended for children less than 12 years of age and children between 12 to 18 years with respiratory conditions.

    Authors’ conclusions:
    This review has highlighted the absence of any randomised controlled trials evaluating codeine-based medications in the treatment of childhood chronic cough. Given the potential adverse events of respiratory suppression and opioid toxicity, national therapeutic regulatory authorities recommend the contraindication of access to codeine in children less than 12 years of age. We suggest that clinical practice adhere to clinical practice guidelines and thus refrain from using codeine or its derivatives to treat cough in children. Aetiological-based management practices continue to be advocated for children with chronic cough.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberCD011914
    Pages (from-to)1-22
    Number of pages22
    JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Volume2016
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2016

      Fingerprint

    Cite this