Community Driven Development and Structural Disadvantage: Interrogating the Social Turn in Development Programming in Indonesia

J. F. McCARTHY; D. J. Steenbergen; C. Warren; G. Acciaioli; G. Baker; A. Lucas; V. Rambe

doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024

Community Driven Development and Structural Disadvantage: Interrogating the Social Turn in Development Programming in Indonesia

J. F. McCARTHY, D. J. Steenbergen, C. Warren, G. Acciaioli, G. Baker, A. Lucas, V. Rambe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Community-driven development (CDD) programmes have emerged on a large scale in the Global South following research and policy work regarding social capital, capabilities and empowerment. This paper analyses one of the largest international examples of the ‘social’ turn, examining the effects of the CDD approach in governmental, structural and relational terms. While the CDD approach successfully generated new political rationalities and governmental technologies, the ability of development programming driven by social capital concepts to empower marginalised sections of society remains in question. The ambiguities associated with CDD outcomes indicate the contradictions at the heart of social capital debate.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1988-2004
Number of pages	17
Journal	KRITIS: Journal of Development Studies
Volume	53
Issue number	12
Early online date	6 Dec 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024
Publication status	Published - 2 Dec 2017

Access to Document

10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024

Cite this

@article{a7829fd8ca6e463c991db8d599fb670d,

title = "Community Driven Development and Structural Disadvantage: Interrogating the Social Turn in Development Programming in Indonesia",

abstract = "Community-driven development (CDD) programmes have emerged on a large scale in the Global South following research and policy work regarding social capital, capabilities and empowerment. This paper analyses one of the largest international examples of the {\textquoteleft}social{\textquoteright} turn, examining the effects of the CDD approach in governmental, structural and relational terms. While the CDD approach successfully generated new political rationalities and governmental technologies, the ability of development programming driven by social capital concepts to empower marginalised sections of society remains in question. The ambiguities associated with CDD outcomes indicate the contradictions at the heart of social capital debate.",

author = "McCARTHY, {J. F.} and Steenbergen, {D. J.} and C. Warren and G. Acciaioli and G. Baker and A. Lucas and V. Rambe",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "1988--2004",

journal = "KRITIS: Journal of Development Studies",

issn = "0022-0388",

publisher = "Satya Wacana Christian University: Graduate Program of Development Studies",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community Driven Development and Structural Disadvantage

T2 - Interrogating the Social Turn in Development Programming in Indonesia

AU - McCARTHY, J. F.

AU - Steenbergen, D. J.

AU - Warren, C.

AU - Acciaioli, G.

AU - Baker, G.

AU - Lucas, A.

AU - Rambe, V.

PY - 2017/12/2

Y1 - 2017/12/2

N2 - Community-driven development (CDD) programmes have emerged on a large scale in the Global South following research and policy work regarding social capital, capabilities and empowerment. This paper analyses one of the largest international examples of the ‘social’ turn, examining the effects of the CDD approach in governmental, structural and relational terms. While the CDD approach successfully generated new political rationalities and governmental technologies, the ability of development programming driven by social capital concepts to empower marginalised sections of society remains in question. The ambiguities associated with CDD outcomes indicate the contradictions at the heart of social capital debate.

AB - Community-driven development (CDD) programmes have emerged on a large scale in the Global South following research and policy work regarding social capital, capabilities and empowerment. This paper analyses one of the largest international examples of the ‘social’ turn, examining the effects of the CDD approach in governmental, structural and relational terms. While the CDD approach successfully generated new political rationalities and governmental technologies, the ability of development programming driven by social capital concepts to empower marginalised sections of society remains in question. The ambiguities associated with CDD outcomes indicate the contradictions at the heart of social capital debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002002626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024

DO - 10.1080/00220388.2016.1262024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002002626

SN - 0022-0388

VL - 53

SP - 1988

EP - 2004

JO - KRITIS: Journal of Development Studies

JF - KRITIS: Journal of Development Studies

IS - 12

ER -

Community Driven Development and Structural Disadvantage: Interrogating the Social Turn in Development Programming in Indonesia

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this