Community resilience across Australia towards natural hazards: An application of the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Natural hazards can turn into disasters when not managed well. An important part of disaster risk reduction is to understand how well communities are prepared for natural hazards and how well they can cope with and recover from shocks in the long term. This research assesses self-reported community resilience and asks what makes a community resilient, using Australia as a case study. It reports on an Australian-wide online survey which included questions related to the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement, a subjective indicator, as well as questions about risk perception, well-being, and self-efficacy. Community resilience was found to be moderately high but scores for community leadership and preparedness were low. Perceived community resilience was positively correlated with age and those with high scores for self-efficacy and well-being. There was, as expected, an inverse relationship between reliance on external support during natural hazards and self-efficacy. The results complement previous studies which used different measures of community resilience.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12590
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalDisasters
Volume48
Issue number1
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Open access publishing facilitated by Charles Darwin University, as part of the Wiley – Charles Darwin University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Disasters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of ODI.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community resilience across Australia towards natural hazards: An application of the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this