Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank

Md Nurul Kabir, Andrew Worthington, Rakesh Gupta

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, we consider the levels of credit risk in Islamic and conventional banks. One problem with existing studies is the use of accounting information alone to assess credit risk, and this could be especially misleading with Islamic banking. Using a market-based credit risk measure, Merton's distance-to-default (DD) model, we evaluate the credit risk of 156 conventional banks and 37 Islamic banks across 13 countries between 2000 and 2012. We also calculate the accounting information-based Z-score and nonperforming loan (NPL) ratio for the purpose of comparison. Our results show that Islamic banks have significantly lower credit risk than conventional banks as based on DD. In contrast, and as expected, Islamic banks display much higher credit risk using the Z-score and NPL ratio. These findings suggest that the measure chosen plays a significant role in assessing the actual credit risk of Islamic banks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)327-353
    Number of pages27
    JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
    Volume34
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015

    Fingerprint

    Credit risk
    Islamic financial institutions
    Non-performing loans
    Accounting information
    Z-score
    Islamic banking
    Risk measures

    Cite this

    Kabir, Md Nurul ; Worthington, Andrew ; Gupta, Rakesh. / Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank. In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 34. pp. 327-353.
    @article{360cc8c031db402d823080dde9492f94,
    title = "Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank",
    abstract = "In this paper, we consider the levels of credit risk in Islamic and conventional banks. One problem with existing studies is the use of accounting information alone to assess credit risk, and this could be especially misleading with Islamic banking. Using a market-based credit risk measure, Merton's distance-to-default (DD) model, we evaluate the credit risk of 156 conventional banks and 37 Islamic banks across 13 countries between 2000 and 2012. We also calculate the accounting information-based Z-score and nonperforming loan (NPL) ratio for the purpose of comparison. Our results show that Islamic banks have significantly lower credit risk than conventional banks as based on DD. In contrast, and as expected, Islamic banks display much higher credit risk using the Z-score and NPL ratio. These findings suggest that the measure chosen plays a significant role in assessing the actual credit risk of Islamic banks.",
    keywords = "Credit risk, Distance-to-default, Islamic banking, Nonperforming loans, Z-scores",
    author = "Kabir, {Md Nurul} and Andrew Worthington and Rakesh Gupta",
    year = "2015",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.06.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "327--353",
    journal = "Pacific Basin Finance Journal",
    issn = "0927-538X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank. / Kabir, Md Nurul; Worthington, Andrew; Gupta, Rakesh.

    In: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 34, 01.09.2015, p. 327-353.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank

    AU - Kabir, Md Nurul

    AU - Worthington, Andrew

    AU - Gupta, Rakesh

    PY - 2015/9/1

    Y1 - 2015/9/1

    N2 - In this paper, we consider the levels of credit risk in Islamic and conventional banks. One problem with existing studies is the use of accounting information alone to assess credit risk, and this could be especially misleading with Islamic banking. Using a market-based credit risk measure, Merton's distance-to-default (DD) model, we evaluate the credit risk of 156 conventional banks and 37 Islamic banks across 13 countries between 2000 and 2012. We also calculate the accounting information-based Z-score and nonperforming loan (NPL) ratio for the purpose of comparison. Our results show that Islamic banks have significantly lower credit risk than conventional banks as based on DD. In contrast, and as expected, Islamic banks display much higher credit risk using the Z-score and NPL ratio. These findings suggest that the measure chosen plays a significant role in assessing the actual credit risk of Islamic banks.

    AB - In this paper, we consider the levels of credit risk in Islamic and conventional banks. One problem with existing studies is the use of accounting information alone to assess credit risk, and this could be especially misleading with Islamic banking. Using a market-based credit risk measure, Merton's distance-to-default (DD) model, we evaluate the credit risk of 156 conventional banks and 37 Islamic banks across 13 countries between 2000 and 2012. We also calculate the accounting information-based Z-score and nonperforming loan (NPL) ratio for the purpose of comparison. Our results show that Islamic banks have significantly lower credit risk than conventional banks as based on DD. In contrast, and as expected, Islamic banks display much higher credit risk using the Z-score and NPL ratio. These findings suggest that the measure chosen plays a significant role in assessing the actual credit risk of Islamic banks.

    KW - Credit risk

    KW - Distance-to-default

    KW - Islamic banking

    KW - Nonperforming loans

    KW - Z-scores

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941746201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.06.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.06.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 327

    EP - 353

    JO - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

    JF - Pacific Basin Finance Journal

    SN - 0927-538X

    ER -