Abstract
Objective: To illustrate how regional variation in data quality could explain some or all of the apparent regional differences in the health status of Indigenous Australians.
Methods: A series of simple hypothetical numerical examples is provided, with varying assumptions regarding the accuracy of identification of Indigenous deaths.
Results: The apparent difference in Indigenous mortality in remote compared with urban areas is of a magnitude that could be explained by relatively modest regional differences in data quality.
Conclusion and implications: Determinations of relative health status within the Indigenous population must take into account the impact of variability in data quality.
Methods: A series of simple hypothetical numerical examples is provided, with varying assumptions regarding the accuracy of identification of Indigenous deaths.
Results: The apparent difference in Indigenous mortality in remote compared with urban areas is of a magnitude that could be explained by relatively modest regional differences in data quality.
Conclusion and implications: Determinations of relative health status within the Indigenous population must take into account the impact of variability in data quality.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 497-499 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2002 |