Compulsory coding in education

liberal-humanism, Baudrillard and the ‘problem’ of abstraction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Internationally, coding is increasingly introduced into primary and junior high schools (children generally aged between 5 and 15) on a compulsory basis, though not all stakeholders support this ‘initiative’. In response to the public reception, discussion highlights popular argument around compulsory coding in school education. This is an argument between those supportive (hereafter referred to as the Yes case) and those unsupportive of compulsory coding (hereafter referred to as the No case). But more than simply produce a list of arguments, this discussion contributes to our understanding of this reception by identifying the ‘discourses’ deployed by both cases (namely, digital ubiquity, disadvantage, and habits of mind discourses) and by providing theoretical framings through which these discourses and their potential implications might be differently understood. Using critical discourse analysis to unpack these discourses shows that while both cases hold to key tenets of liberal-humanism, a commitment to the individual subject, liberty and full participation in the social, it is the Yes case with its stronger commitment to children engaging in abstraction that seems to challenge these. Discussion of this difference is framed by the work of Baudrillard around abstraction, not to ‘prove’ the validity of Baudrillard’s thesis concerning the consequences of humanity’s deepening engagement with abstraction, but to provide a broader understanding of this debate, in relation to a trajectory of engagement with abstraction that seems set to intensify.

Original languageEnglish
Article number14
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date26 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Humanism
humanism
abstraction
coding
Education
Trajectories
discourse
Habits
education
commitment
school education
discourse analysis
schoolchild
habits
stakeholder
participation
Discourse

Cite this

@article{cd05980fdbcb4aee8bfe2381a1bca34f,
title = "Compulsory coding in education: liberal-humanism, Baudrillard and the ‘problem’ of abstraction",
abstract = "Internationally, coding is increasingly introduced into primary and junior high schools (children generally aged between 5 and 15) on a compulsory basis, though not all stakeholders support this ‘initiative’. In response to the public reception, discussion highlights popular argument around compulsory coding in school education. This is an argument between those supportive (hereafter referred to as the Yes case) and those unsupportive of compulsory coding (hereafter referred to as the No case). But more than simply produce a list of arguments, this discussion contributes to our understanding of this reception by identifying the ‘discourses’ deployed by both cases (namely, digital ubiquity, disadvantage, and habits of mind discourses) and by providing theoretical framings through which these discourses and their potential implications might be differently understood. Using critical discourse analysis to unpack these discourses shows that while both cases hold to key tenets of liberal-humanism, a commitment to the individual subject, liberty and full participation in the social, it is the Yes case with its stronger commitment to children engaging in abstraction that seems to challenge these. Discussion of this difference is framed by the work of Baudrillard around abstraction, not to ‘prove’ the validity of Baudrillard’s thesis concerning the consequences of humanity’s deepening engagement with abstraction, but to provide a broader understanding of this debate, in relation to a trajectory of engagement with abstraction that seems set to intensify.",
keywords = "Coding, Schooling, Abstraction, Baudrillard",
author = "Laurence Tamatea",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1186/s41039-019-0106-3",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning",
issn = "1793-2068",
publisher = "Unknown",
number = "1",

}

Compulsory coding in education : liberal-humanism, Baudrillard and the ‘problem’ of abstraction. / Tamatea, Laurence.

In: Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 14, No. 1, 14, 12.2019, p. 1-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compulsory coding in education

T2 - liberal-humanism, Baudrillard and the ‘problem’ of abstraction

AU - Tamatea, Laurence

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Internationally, coding is increasingly introduced into primary and junior high schools (children generally aged between 5 and 15) on a compulsory basis, though not all stakeholders support this ‘initiative’. In response to the public reception, discussion highlights popular argument around compulsory coding in school education. This is an argument between those supportive (hereafter referred to as the Yes case) and those unsupportive of compulsory coding (hereafter referred to as the No case). But more than simply produce a list of arguments, this discussion contributes to our understanding of this reception by identifying the ‘discourses’ deployed by both cases (namely, digital ubiquity, disadvantage, and habits of mind discourses) and by providing theoretical framings through which these discourses and their potential implications might be differently understood. Using critical discourse analysis to unpack these discourses shows that while both cases hold to key tenets of liberal-humanism, a commitment to the individual subject, liberty and full participation in the social, it is the Yes case with its stronger commitment to children engaging in abstraction that seems to challenge these. Discussion of this difference is framed by the work of Baudrillard around abstraction, not to ‘prove’ the validity of Baudrillard’s thesis concerning the consequences of humanity’s deepening engagement with abstraction, but to provide a broader understanding of this debate, in relation to a trajectory of engagement with abstraction that seems set to intensify.

AB - Internationally, coding is increasingly introduced into primary and junior high schools (children generally aged between 5 and 15) on a compulsory basis, though not all stakeholders support this ‘initiative’. In response to the public reception, discussion highlights popular argument around compulsory coding in school education. This is an argument between those supportive (hereafter referred to as the Yes case) and those unsupportive of compulsory coding (hereafter referred to as the No case). But more than simply produce a list of arguments, this discussion contributes to our understanding of this reception by identifying the ‘discourses’ deployed by both cases (namely, digital ubiquity, disadvantage, and habits of mind discourses) and by providing theoretical framings through which these discourses and their potential implications might be differently understood. Using critical discourse analysis to unpack these discourses shows that while both cases hold to key tenets of liberal-humanism, a commitment to the individual subject, liberty and full participation in the social, it is the Yes case with its stronger commitment to children engaging in abstraction that seems to challenge these. Discussion of this difference is framed by the work of Baudrillard around abstraction, not to ‘prove’ the validity of Baudrillard’s thesis concerning the consequences of humanity’s deepening engagement with abstraction, but to provide a broader understanding of this debate, in relation to a trajectory of engagement with abstraction that seems set to intensify.

KW - Coding

KW - Schooling

KW - Abstraction

KW - Baudrillard

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074202708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s41039-019-0106-3

DO - 10.1186/s41039-019-0106-3

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

JF - Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

SN - 1793-2068

IS - 1

M1 - 14

ER -