Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability

Perry Morrison, Tom Forester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many have argued that industrial societies are becoming more technology-dependent and are thus more vulnerable to technology failures. Despite the pervasiveness of computer technology, little is known about computer failures, except perhaps that they are all too common. This article analyses the sources of computer unreliability and reviews the extent and cost of unreliable computers. Unlike previous writers, the authors argue that digital computers are inherently unreliable for two reasons: first, they are prone to total rather than partial failure; and second, their enormous complexity means that they can never be thoroughly tested before use. The authors then describe various institutional attempts to improve reliability and possible solutions proposed by computer scientists, but they conclude that as yet none is adequate. Accordingly, they recommend that computers should not be used in life-critical applications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-474
Number of pages13
JournalFutures
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1990

Fingerprint

vulnerability
computer scientist
industrial society
Vulnerability
writer
costs
cost

Cite this

Morrison, Perry ; Forester, Tom. / Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability. In: Futures. 1990 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 462-474.
@article{76f5f271dc1043d881d1bfe3f87bb924,
title = "Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability",
abstract = "Many have argued that industrial societies are becoming more technology-dependent and are thus more vulnerable to technology failures. Despite the pervasiveness of computer technology, little is known about computer failures, except perhaps that they are all too common. This article analyses the sources of computer unreliability and reviews the extent and cost of unreliable computers. Unlike previous writers, the authors argue that digital computers are inherently unreliable for two reasons: first, they are prone to total rather than partial failure; and second, their enormous complexity means that they can never be thoroughly tested before use. The authors then describe various institutional attempts to improve reliability and possible solutions proposed by computer scientists, but they conclude that as yet none is adequate. Accordingly, they recommend that computers should not be used in life-critical applications.",
author = "Perry Morrison and Tom Forester",
year = "1990",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/0016-3287(90)90110-4",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "462--474",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Morrison, P & Forester, T 1990, 'Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability' Futures, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 462-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90110-4

Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability. / Morrison, Perry; Forester, Tom.

In: Futures, Vol. 22, No. 5, 06.1990, p. 462-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer Unreliability and Social Vulnerability

AU - Morrison, Perry

AU - Forester, Tom

PY - 1990/6

Y1 - 1990/6

N2 - Many have argued that industrial societies are becoming more technology-dependent and are thus more vulnerable to technology failures. Despite the pervasiveness of computer technology, little is known about computer failures, except perhaps that they are all too common. This article analyses the sources of computer unreliability and reviews the extent and cost of unreliable computers. Unlike previous writers, the authors argue that digital computers are inherently unreliable for two reasons: first, they are prone to total rather than partial failure; and second, their enormous complexity means that they can never be thoroughly tested before use. The authors then describe various institutional attempts to improve reliability and possible solutions proposed by computer scientists, but they conclude that as yet none is adequate. Accordingly, they recommend that computers should not be used in life-critical applications.

AB - Many have argued that industrial societies are becoming more technology-dependent and are thus more vulnerable to technology failures. Despite the pervasiveness of computer technology, little is known about computer failures, except perhaps that they are all too common. This article analyses the sources of computer unreliability and reviews the extent and cost of unreliable computers. Unlike previous writers, the authors argue that digital computers are inherently unreliable for two reasons: first, they are prone to total rather than partial failure; and second, their enormous complexity means that they can never be thoroughly tested before use. The authors then describe various institutional attempts to improve reliability and possible solutions proposed by computer scientists, but they conclude that as yet none is adequate. Accordingly, they recommend that computers should not be used in life-critical applications.

U2 - 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90110-4

DO - 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90110-4

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 462

EP - 474

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 0016-3287

IS - 5

ER -