Construction of an instrument to measure effectiveness of placement settings and experiences

Vanessa Sturre; Sophie M Keele; Kathryn Von Treuer; Simon Moss; Janet McLeod; Susie Macfarlane

Construction of an instrument to measure effectiveness of placement settings and experiences

Vanessa Sturre, Sophie M Keele, Kathryn Von Treuer, Simon Moss, Janet McLeod, Susie Macfarlane

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Evidence-based evaluation instruments for course units offer academics quality data, useful for continual improvement. Placement units are not traditional course units and may require a specific evaluation instrument, of which none seem available. This study commenced the development of a placement evaluation instrument supported by a relevant learning framework. The qualitative study was conducted (n=56) and examined the views of placement stakeholders regarding what attributes of the placement experience should be evaluated. Data were thematically analyzed, leading to a 25 item evaluation instrument. This instrument can be completed by students to evaluate and improve placement experiences and outcomes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	225-238
Number of pages	14
Journal	Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education
Volume	13
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

5259984-oaFinal published version, 651 KBLicence: Unspecified

http://www.apjce.org/files/APJCE_13_4_225_238.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Construction of an instrument to measure effectiveness of placement settings and experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{eab418efc9934ded88c6ae7f74df587d,

title = "Construction of an instrument to measure effectiveness of placement settings and experiences",

abstract = "Evidence-based evaluation instruments for course units offer academics quality data, useful for continual improvement. Placement units are not traditional course units and may require a specific evaluation instrument, of which none seem available. This study commenced the development of a placement evaluation instrument supported by a relevant learning framework. The qualitative study was conducted (n=56) and examined the views of placement stakeholders regarding what attributes of the placement experience should be evaluated. Data were thematically analyzed, leading to a 25 item evaluation instrument. This instrument can be completed by students to evaluate and improve placement experiences and outcomes. ",

author = "Vanessa Sturre and Keele, {Sophie M} and {Von Treuer}, Kathryn and Simon Moss and Janet McLeod and Susie Macfarlane",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "225--238",

journal = "Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education",

issn = "1175-2882",

publisher = "Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction of an instrument to measure effectiveness of placement settings and experiences

AU - Sturre, Vanessa

AU - Keele, Sophie M

AU - Von Treuer, Kathryn

AU - Moss, Simon

AU - McLeod, Janet

AU - Macfarlane, Susie

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Evidence-based evaluation instruments for course units offer academics quality data, useful for continual improvement. Placement units are not traditional course units and may require a specific evaluation instrument, of which none seem available. This study commenced the development of a placement evaluation instrument supported by a relevant learning framework. The qualitative study was conducted (n=56) and examined the views of placement stakeholders regarding what attributes of the placement experience should be evaluated. Data were thematically analyzed, leading to a 25 item evaluation instrument. This instrument can be completed by students to evaluate and improve placement experiences and outcomes.

AB - Evidence-based evaluation instruments for course units offer academics quality data, useful for continual improvement. Placement units are not traditional course units and may require a specific evaluation instrument, of which none seem available. This study commenced the development of a placement evaluation instrument supported by a relevant learning framework. The qualitative study was conducted (n=56) and examined the views of placement stakeholders regarding what attributes of the placement experience should be evaluated. Data were thematically analyzed, leading to a 25 item evaluation instrument. This instrument can be completed by students to evaluate and improve placement experiences and outcomes.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 225

EP - 238

JO - Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education

JF - Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education

SN - 1175-2882

IS - 4

ER -