Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species

A Case Study from Australia

Claire A. Runge, Eduardo Gallo-Cajiao, Mark J. Carey, Stephen T. Garnett, Richard A. Fuller, Phillipa C. Mccormack

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Migratory movements of animals frequently span political borders and the need for international collaboration in the conservation of migratory species is well recognized. There is, however, less appreciation of the need for coordinated protection within nations. We explore consequences of multilevel governance for top-down implementation of international agreements, drawing on examples from Australia and with reference to the United States and European Union. Coherent implementation of legislation and policy for migratory species can be challenging in federal jurisdictions where environmental law making can be split across multiple levels of governance and local and federal priorities may not necessarily be aligned. As a result of these challenges, for example, two-thirds of Australian migratory birds remain unprotected under national legislation. In Australia and elsewhere, coordinated protection of migratory species can be implemented within the current framework of conservation law and policy by actions such as designating national migration areas, negotiating nationally coordinated agreements or listings of migratory species and pursuing new bilateral agreements with key countries along migratory routes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)765-772
    Number of pages8
    JournalConservation Letters
    Volume10
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

    Fingerprint

    international agreements
    migratory species
    international agreement
    laws and regulations
    legislation
    case studies
    governance
    political border
    bilateral agreement
    migration route
    environmental law
    European Union
    animal
    animals
    policy
    need

    Cite this

    Runge, Claire A. ; Gallo-Cajiao, Eduardo ; Carey, Mark J. ; Garnett, Stephen T. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Mccormack, Phillipa C. / Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species : A Case Study from Australia. In: Conservation Letters. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 765-772.
    @article{3c0a9596598b403aaee26cccbbf3e802,
    title = "Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species: A Case Study from Australia",
    abstract = "Migratory movements of animals frequently span political borders and the need for international collaboration in the conservation of migratory species is well recognized. There is, however, less appreciation of the need for coordinated protection within nations. We explore consequences of multilevel governance for top-down implementation of international agreements, drawing on examples from Australia and with reference to the United States and European Union. Coherent implementation of legislation and policy for migratory species can be challenging in federal jurisdictions where environmental law making can be split across multiple levels of governance and local and federal priorities may not necessarily be aligned. As a result of these challenges, for example, two-thirds of Australian migratory birds remain unprotected under national legislation. In Australia and elsewhere, coordinated protection of migratory species can be implemented within the current framework of conservation law and policy by actions such as designating national migration areas, negotiating nationally coordinated agreements or listings of migratory species and pursuing new bilateral agreements with key countries along migratory routes.",
    keywords = "Bird conservation, Conservation, Governance, Legislation, Migratory species, Policy",
    author = "Runge, {Claire A.} and Eduardo Gallo-Cajiao and Carey, {Mark J.} and Garnett, {Stephen T.} and Fuller, {Richard A.} and Mccormack, {Phillipa C.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1111/conl.12345",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "765--772",
    journal = "Conservation Letters",
    issn = "1755-263X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "6",

    }

    Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species : A Case Study from Australia. / Runge, Claire A.; Gallo-Cajiao, Eduardo; Carey, Mark J.; Garnett, Stephen T.; Fuller, Richard A.; Mccormack, Phillipa C.

    In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 10, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 765-772.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Coordinating Domestic Legislation and International Agreements to Conserve Migratory Species

    T2 - A Case Study from Australia

    AU - Runge, Claire A.

    AU - Gallo-Cajiao, Eduardo

    AU - Carey, Mark J.

    AU - Garnett, Stephen T.

    AU - Fuller, Richard A.

    AU - Mccormack, Phillipa C.

    PY - 2017/12

    Y1 - 2017/12

    N2 - Migratory movements of animals frequently span political borders and the need for international collaboration in the conservation of migratory species is well recognized. There is, however, less appreciation of the need for coordinated protection within nations. We explore consequences of multilevel governance for top-down implementation of international agreements, drawing on examples from Australia and with reference to the United States and European Union. Coherent implementation of legislation and policy for migratory species can be challenging in federal jurisdictions where environmental law making can be split across multiple levels of governance and local and federal priorities may not necessarily be aligned. As a result of these challenges, for example, two-thirds of Australian migratory birds remain unprotected under national legislation. In Australia and elsewhere, coordinated protection of migratory species can be implemented within the current framework of conservation law and policy by actions such as designating national migration areas, negotiating nationally coordinated agreements or listings of migratory species and pursuing new bilateral agreements with key countries along migratory routes.

    AB - Migratory movements of animals frequently span political borders and the need for international collaboration in the conservation of migratory species is well recognized. There is, however, less appreciation of the need for coordinated protection within nations. We explore consequences of multilevel governance for top-down implementation of international agreements, drawing on examples from Australia and with reference to the United States and European Union. Coherent implementation of legislation and policy for migratory species can be challenging in federal jurisdictions where environmental law making can be split across multiple levels of governance and local and federal priorities may not necessarily be aligned. As a result of these challenges, for example, two-thirds of Australian migratory birds remain unprotected under national legislation. In Australia and elsewhere, coordinated protection of migratory species can be implemented within the current framework of conservation law and policy by actions such as designating national migration areas, negotiating nationally coordinated agreements or listings of migratory species and pursuing new bilateral agreements with key countries along migratory routes.

    KW - Bird conservation

    KW - Conservation

    KW - Governance

    KW - Legislation

    KW - Migratory species

    KW - Policy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013671202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/conl.12345

    DO - 10.1111/conl.12345

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 765

    EP - 772

    JO - Conservation Letters

    JF - Conservation Letters

    SN - 1755-263X

    IS - 6

    ER -