Critical Race Theory and the Orthodoxy of Race Neutrality

Examining the Denigration of Australian Indigenous Athlete Adam Goodes

Coram Stella, Christopher Hallinan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study draws on critical race theory to examine common sense assumptions of race and racism so as to identify the distortions in logic in the justification that the booing of Indigenous athlete Adam Goodes was not 'racist'. It is claimed that the central assumption of race neutrality relies on the assertion that non-Indigenous athletes are booed and that the booing of an individual such as Adam Goodes does not constitute racism since, for this to be the case, it must apply to all Indigenous athletes. Moreover, race is not targeted, only the athlete, nor is booing explicit of race. This study highlights the historical context within which Indigenous athletes are racially discriminated against. We contend that booing represents a covert reworking of the racial vilification of Indigenous athletes and that their vilification is but one form of racism. A theoretical piece, this paper follows in-depth examination of the content of booing (Coram 2016).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)99-111
    Number of pages13
    JournalAustralian Aboriginal Studies
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    neutrality
    athlete
    racism
    Neutrality
    Athletes
    Orthodoxy
    Critical Race Theory
    examination
    Racism

    Cite this

    @article{85ed7a8985024ba9917ab8cb0d66c2f2,
    title = "Critical Race Theory and the Orthodoxy of Race Neutrality: Examining the Denigration of Australian Indigenous Athlete Adam Goodes",
    abstract = "This study draws on critical race theory to examine common sense assumptions of race and racism so as to identify the distortions in logic in the justification that the booing of Indigenous athlete Adam Goodes was not 'racist'. It is claimed that the central assumption of race neutrality relies on the assertion that non-Indigenous athletes are booed and that the booing of an individual such as Adam Goodes does not constitute racism since, for this to be the case, it must apply to all Indigenous athletes. Moreover, race is not targeted, only the athlete, nor is booing explicit of race. This study highlights the historical context within which Indigenous athletes are racially discriminated against. We contend that booing represents a covert reworking of the racial vilification of Indigenous athletes and that their vilification is but one form of racism. A theoretical piece, this paper follows in-depth examination of the content of booing (Coram 2016).",
    author = "Coram Stella and Christopher Hallinan",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    pages = "99--111",
    journal = "Australian Aboriginal Studies",
    issn = "0729-4352",
    publisher = "Aboriginal Studies Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Critical Race Theory and the Orthodoxy of Race Neutrality : Examining the Denigration of Australian Indigenous Athlete Adam Goodes. / Stella, Coram; Hallinan, Christopher.

    In: Australian Aboriginal Studies, No. 1, 2017, p. 99-111.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Critical Race Theory and the Orthodoxy of Race Neutrality

    T2 - Examining the Denigration of Australian Indigenous Athlete Adam Goodes

    AU - Stella, Coram

    AU - Hallinan, Christopher

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This study draws on critical race theory to examine common sense assumptions of race and racism so as to identify the distortions in logic in the justification that the booing of Indigenous athlete Adam Goodes was not 'racist'. It is claimed that the central assumption of race neutrality relies on the assertion that non-Indigenous athletes are booed and that the booing of an individual such as Adam Goodes does not constitute racism since, for this to be the case, it must apply to all Indigenous athletes. Moreover, race is not targeted, only the athlete, nor is booing explicit of race. This study highlights the historical context within which Indigenous athletes are racially discriminated against. We contend that booing represents a covert reworking of the racial vilification of Indigenous athletes and that their vilification is but one form of racism. A theoretical piece, this paper follows in-depth examination of the content of booing (Coram 2016).

    AB - This study draws on critical race theory to examine common sense assumptions of race and racism so as to identify the distortions in logic in the justification that the booing of Indigenous athlete Adam Goodes was not 'racist'. It is claimed that the central assumption of race neutrality relies on the assertion that non-Indigenous athletes are booed and that the booing of an individual such as Adam Goodes does not constitute racism since, for this to be the case, it must apply to all Indigenous athletes. Moreover, race is not targeted, only the athlete, nor is booing explicit of race. This study highlights the historical context within which Indigenous athletes are racially discriminated against. We contend that booing represents a covert reworking of the racial vilification of Indigenous athletes and that their vilification is but one form of racism. A theoretical piece, this paper follows in-depth examination of the content of booing (Coram 2016).

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026460729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    SP - 99

    EP - 111

    JO - Australian Aboriginal Studies

    JF - Australian Aboriginal Studies

    SN - 0729-4352

    IS - 1

    ER -