Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome

Caroline Lehmann, Sally Archibald, William Hoffman, William Bond

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We aimed to identify the limits of savanna across Africa, Australia and South America. We based our investigation on the rich history of hypotheses previously examined: that the limits of savanna are variously determined by rainfall, rainfall seasonality, soil fertility and disturbance. We categorized vegetation on all continents as 'savanna' (open habitats with a C4 grass layer) or 'not-savanna' (closed habitats with no C4 grass layer) and used a combination of statistical approaches to examine how the presence of savanna varied as a function of five environmental correlates. The presence of savanna is constrained by effective rainfall and rainfall seasonality. Soil fertility is regionally important, although the direction of its effect changes relative to rainfall. We identified three continental divergences in the limits of savanna that could not be explained by environment. Climate and soils do not have a deterministic effect on the distribution of savanna. Over the range of savanna, some proportion of the land is always 'not-savanna'. We reconciled previous contradictory views of savanna limits by developing a new conceptual framework for understanding these limits by categorizing environmental factors into whether they had a positive or negative effect on woody growth and the frequency of disturbance. � 2011 The Authors. New Phytologist � 2011 New Phytologist Trust.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)197-209
    Number of pages13
    JournalNew Phytologist
    Volume191
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lehmann, C., Archibald, S., Hoffman, W., & Bond, W. (2011). Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome. New Phytologist, 191(1), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03689.x