Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation

Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists

A CASS, Joan Cunningham, K ANDERSON, Paul Snelling, S Colman, J DEVITT, C Preece, J Eris

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)299-304
    Number of pages6
    JournalNephrology
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Kidney Transplantation
    Decision Making
    Transplantation
    Chronic Kidney Failure
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    Nephrologists
    Heart Diseases
    Demography
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Transplants
    Weights and Measures

    Cite this

    CASS, A., Cunningham, J., ANDERSON, K., Snelling, P., Colman, S., DEVITT, J., ... Eris, J. (2007). Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. Nephrology, 12(3), 299-304.
    CASS, A ; Cunningham, Joan ; ANDERSON, K ; Snelling, Paul ; Colman, S ; DEVITT, J ; Preece, C ; Eris, J. / Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation : Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. In: Nephrology. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 299-304.
    @article{135ae3866ceb437587cadccf8716e815,
    title = "Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists",
    abstract = "Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.",
    keywords = "adult, age, aged, article, Australia, body weight, cigarette smoking, clinical feature, demography, diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, female, geography, health survey, heart disease, human, indigenous people, kidney failure, kidney transplantation, major clinical study, male, medical decision making, nephrologist, outcome assessment, priority journal, sex difference, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Humans, Kidney Transplantation, Nephrology, Patient Selection, Questionnaires",
    author = "A CASS and Joan Cunningham and K ANDERSON and Paul Snelling and S Colman and J DEVITT and C Preece and J Eris",
    year = "2007",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "299--304",
    journal = "Nephrology",
    issn = "1320-5358",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    CASS, A, Cunningham, J, ANDERSON, K, Snelling, P, Colman, S, DEVITT, J, Preece, C & Eris, J 2007, 'Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists', Nephrology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 299-304.

    Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation : Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. / CASS, A; Cunningham, Joan; ANDERSON, K; Snelling, Paul; Colman, S; DEVITT, J; Preece, C; Eris, J.

    In: Nephrology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, p. 299-304.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation

    T2 - Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists

    AU - CASS, A

    AU - Cunningham, Joan

    AU - ANDERSON, K

    AU - Snelling, Paul

    AU - Colman, S

    AU - DEVITT, J

    AU - Preece, C

    AU - Eris, J

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.

    AB - Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.

    KW - adult

    KW - age

    KW - aged

    KW - article

    KW - Australia

    KW - body weight

    KW - cigarette smoking

    KW - clinical feature

    KW - demography

    KW - diabetes mellitus

    KW - ethnicity

    KW - female

    KW - geography

    KW - health survey

    KW - heart disease

    KW - human

    KW - indigenous people

    KW - kidney failure

    KW - kidney transplantation

    KW - major clinical study

    KW - male

    KW - medical decision making

    KW - nephrologist

    KW - outcome assessment

    KW - priority journal

    KW - sex difference

    KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

    KW - Decision Making

    KW - Humans

    KW - Kidney Transplantation

    KW - Nephrology

    KW - Patient Selection

    KW - Questionnaires

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 299

    EP - 304

    JO - Nephrology

    JF - Nephrology

    SN - 1320-5358

    IS - 3

    ER -