Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation

Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists

A CASS, Joan Cunningham, K ANDERSON, Paul Snelling, S Colman, J DEVITT, C Preece, J Eris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-304
Number of pages6
JournalNephrology
Volume12
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Kidney Transplantation
Decision Making
Transplantation
Chronic Kidney Failure
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nephrologists
Heart Diseases
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Transplants
Weights and Measures

Cite this

CASS, A., Cunningham, J., ANDERSON, K., Snelling, P., Colman, S., DEVITT, J., ... Eris, J. (2007). Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. Nephrology, 12(3), 299-304.
CASS, A ; Cunningham, Joan ; ANDERSON, K ; Snelling, Paul ; Colman, S ; DEVITT, J ; Preece, C ; Eris, J. / Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation : Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. In: Nephrology. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 299-304.
@article{135ae3866ceb437587cadccf8716e815,
title = "Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists",
abstract = "Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.",
keywords = "adult, age, aged, article, Australia, body weight, cigarette smoking, clinical feature, demography, diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, female, geography, health survey, heart disease, human, indigenous people, kidney failure, kidney transplantation, major clinical study, male, medical decision making, nephrologist, outcome assessment, priority journal, sex difference, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Humans, Kidney Transplantation, Nephrology, Patient Selection, Questionnaires",
author = "A CASS and Joan Cunningham and K ANDERSON and Paul Snelling and S Colman and J DEVITT and C Preece and J Eris",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "299--304",
journal = "Nephrology",
issn = "1320-5358",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

CASS, A, Cunningham, J, ANDERSON, K, Snelling, P, Colman, S, DEVITT, J, Preece, C & Eris, J 2007, 'Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists', Nephrology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 299-304.

Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation : Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists. / CASS, A; Cunningham, Joan; ANDERSON, K; Snelling, Paul; Colman, S; DEVITT, J; Preece, C; Eris, J.

In: Nephrology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, p. 299-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation

T2 - Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists

AU - CASS, A

AU - Cunningham, Joan

AU - ANDERSON, K

AU - Snelling, Paul

AU - Colman, S

AU - DEVITT, J

AU - Preece, C

AU - Eris, J

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.

AB - Aim: This study aimed to elucidate the factors affecting nephrologists' decision-making on patients' suitability for kidney transplantation. Given the reduced access to transplantation for Indigenous Australians, the role of patient's ethnicity was of particular interest. Methods: A postal survey of practising nephrologists and trainees was undertaken in Australia. Each participant was provided with a unique set of 15 hypothetical patient descriptions, with demographic, clinical and behavioural factors randomly generated to ensure an overall balance of factors across the cases. The main outcome measure was whether kidney transplantation was recommended. Results: Responding nephrologists and trainees were more likely to recommend transplantation for hypothetical patients who were young, of normal weight and described as compliant. They were less likely to recommend transplantation for smokers, or for people with diabetes or heart disease. No significant differences related to the patients' sex or ethnicity. The geographical location of the respondent was a significant determinant, with differences according to their State/Territory and their metropolitan/non-metropolitan location. Conclusion: When all other factors were held constant, nephrologists and trainees appear to base their decision-making regarding suitability for transplant on clinical and behavioural factors, rather than on the basis of ethnicity or sex. In practice, however, clinical and behavioural factors cluster with ethnicity, and this is likely to contribute to the current poor access to transplantation for Indigenous end-stage kidney disease patients. Apparent differences in decision-making according to the respondent's location may reflect variations in practice across the country. � 2007 The Authors.

KW - adult

KW - age

KW - aged

KW - article

KW - Australia

KW - body weight

KW - cigarette smoking

KW - clinical feature

KW - demography

KW - diabetes mellitus

KW - ethnicity

KW - female

KW - geography

KW - health survey

KW - heart disease

KW - human

KW - indigenous people

KW - kidney failure

KW - kidney transplantation

KW - major clinical study

KW - male

KW - medical decision making

KW - nephrologist

KW - outcome assessment

KW - priority journal

KW - sex difference

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Decision Making

KW - Humans

KW - Kidney Transplantation

KW - Nephrology

KW - Patient Selection

KW - Questionnaires

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 299

EP - 304

JO - Nephrology

JF - Nephrology

SN - 1320-5358

IS - 3

ER -