TY - JOUR
T1 - Decolonizing Indigenous health
T2 - Generating a productive dialogue to eliminate Rheumatic Heart Disease in Australia
AU - Haynes, Emma
AU - Walker, Roz
AU - Mitchell, Alice G.
AU - Katzenellenbogen, Judy
AU - D'Antoine, Heather
AU - Bessarab, Dawn
N1 - Funding Information:
Emma Haynes was funded to do initial data collection by the End Rheumatic Heart Disease Centre of Research Excellence (END RHD CRE) funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant (grant number 1080401 ). She was the recipient of an Australian Government Research Training Program postgraduate research scholarship, and END RHD CRE and Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases top-up scholarships while doing the analysis and write up. This work also contributed to the health systems research conducted as part of the NHMRC-funded End RHD in Australia: Study of Epidemiology (ERASE project) ( 114652 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/9
Y1 - 2021/3/9
N2 - In common with colonized Indigenous people worldwide, many Australian Aboriginal people experience inequitable health outcomes. While the commitment and advocacy of researchers and health practitioners has resulted in many notable improvements in policy and practice, systemic and structural impediments continue to restrain widespread gains in addressing Indigenous health injustices. We take Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD), a potent marker of extreme health inequity, as a case study, and critically examine RHD practitioners' perspectives regarding the factors that need to be addressed to improve RHD prevention and care. This study is an important explanatory component of a broader study to inform new clinical practices, and health system strategies and policies to reduce RHD. A decolonising, critical medical anthropology (CMA) analysis of findings from 22 RHD practitioner in-depth interviews conducted in May 2016 revealed both practitioners' perceptions of health system shortcomings and a sense of hopelessness and powerlessness to transform existing health system inequities, the negative impacts of which were subsequently confirmed in a separate study of RHD patients’ lived realities. We reveal how biomedical dominance, normalized deficit discourses and systemic racism influence the current policy and practice landscape, narrowing the intercultural space for productive dialogue and reinforcing the conditions that cause disease. To counter biomedical approaches that contribute to existing health inequities in health care, we recommend localized, strength-based, community-led research projects focused on actions that use critical decolonizing social science approaches to achieve system change. We demonstrate the importance of integrating biological and social sciences approaches in research, education/training, and practice to: 1) be guided by Indigenous strengths, knowledges and worldview, and 2) adopt a critical reflexive stance to examine systems, structures and practices. Such an approach facilitates productive cross-cultural dialogue and social transformation; providing direction and hope to practitioners, enhancing their knowledge, skills and capacity and improving Aboriginal health outcomes.
AB - In common with colonized Indigenous people worldwide, many Australian Aboriginal people experience inequitable health outcomes. While the commitment and advocacy of researchers and health practitioners has resulted in many notable improvements in policy and practice, systemic and structural impediments continue to restrain widespread gains in addressing Indigenous health injustices. We take Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD), a potent marker of extreme health inequity, as a case study, and critically examine RHD practitioners' perspectives regarding the factors that need to be addressed to improve RHD prevention and care. This study is an important explanatory component of a broader study to inform new clinical practices, and health system strategies and policies to reduce RHD. A decolonising, critical medical anthropology (CMA) analysis of findings from 22 RHD practitioner in-depth interviews conducted in May 2016 revealed both practitioners' perceptions of health system shortcomings and a sense of hopelessness and powerlessness to transform existing health system inequities, the negative impacts of which were subsequently confirmed in a separate study of RHD patients’ lived realities. We reveal how biomedical dominance, normalized deficit discourses and systemic racism influence the current policy and practice landscape, narrowing the intercultural space for productive dialogue and reinforcing the conditions that cause disease. To counter biomedical approaches that contribute to existing health inequities in health care, we recommend localized, strength-based, community-led research projects focused on actions that use critical decolonizing social science approaches to achieve system change. We demonstrate the importance of integrating biological and social sciences approaches in research, education/training, and practice to: 1) be guided by Indigenous strengths, knowledges and worldview, and 2) adopt a critical reflexive stance to examine systems, structures and practices. Such an approach facilitates productive cross-cultural dialogue and social transformation; providing direction and hope to practitioners, enhancing their knowledge, skills and capacity and improving Aboriginal health outcomes.
KW - Australian Aboriginal
KW - Biomedical dominance
KW - Critical medical anthropology
KW - Health inequity
KW - Indigenous health
KW - Intercultural space
KW - Rheumatic heart disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105315357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113829
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113829
M3 - Article
C2 - 33895707
AN - SCOPUS:85105315357
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 277
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
M1 - 113829
ER -