Describing and analysing primary health care system support for chronic illness care in Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory - Use of the Chronic Care Model

Damin Si, Ross Stewart Bailie, Joan Cunningham, Gary Robinson, Michelle Dowden, A STEWART, Christine Connors, Tarun Weeramanthri

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background. Indigenous Australians experience disproportionately high prevalence of, and morbidity and mortality from chronic illness such as diabetes, renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Improving the understanding of how Indigenous primary care systems are organised to deliver chronic illness care will inform efforts to improve the quality of care for Indigenous people. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory. Using the Chronic Care Model as a framework, we carried out a mail-out survey to collect information on material, financial and human resources relating to chronic illness care in participating health centres. Follow up face-to-face interviews with health centre staff were conducted to identify successes and difficulties in the systems in relation to providing chronic illness care to community members. Results. Participating health centres had distinct areas of strength and weakness in each component of systems: 1) organisational influence - strengthened by inclusion of chronic illness goals in business plans, appointment of designated chronic disease coordinators and introduction of external clinical audits, but weakened by lack of training in disease prevention and health promotion and limited access to Medicare funding; 2) community linkages - facilitated by working together with community organisations (e.g. local stores) and running community-based programs (e.g. "health week"), but detracted by a shortage of staff especially of Aboriginal health workers working in the community; 3) self management - promoted through patient education and goal setting with clients, but impeded by limited focus on family and community-based activities due to understaffing; 4) decision support - facilitated by distribution of clinical guidelines and their integration with daily care, but limited by inadequate access to and support from specialists; 5) delivery system design - strengthened by provision of transport for clients to health centres, separate men's and women's clinic rooms, specific roles of primary care team members in relation to chronic illness care, effective teamwork, and functional pathology and pharmacy systems, but weakened by staff shortage (particularly doctors and Aboriginal health workers) and high staff turnover; and 6) clinical information systems - facilitated by wide adoption of computerised information systems, but weakened by the systems' complexity and lack of IT maintenance and upgrade support. Conclusion. Using concrete examples, this study translates the concept of the Chronic Care Model (and associated systems view) into practical application in Australian Indigenous primary care settings. This approach proved to be useful in understanding the quality of primary care systems for prevention and management of chronic illness. Further refinement of the systems should focus on both increasing human and financial resources and improving management practice. � 2008 Si et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)112-126
    Number of pages15
    JournalBMC Health Services Research
    Volume8
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Northern Territory
    Primary Health Care
    Chronic Disease
    Delivery of Health Care
    Health
    Quality of Health Care
    Information Systems
    Hospital Distribution Systems
    Clinical Audit
    Practice Management
    Postal Service
    Patient Education
    Self Care
    Medicare
    Health Promotion
    Running
    Appointments and Schedules
    Cardiovascular Diseases
    Cross-Sectional Studies
    Maintenance

    Cite this

    @article{866a625407624ace980da3abb1eb1190,
    title = "Describing and analysing primary health care system support for chronic illness care in Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory - Use of the Chronic Care Model",
    abstract = "Background. Indigenous Australians experience disproportionately high prevalence of, and morbidity and mortality from chronic illness such as diabetes, renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Improving the understanding of how Indigenous primary care systems are organised to deliver chronic illness care will inform efforts to improve the quality of care for Indigenous people. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory. Using the Chronic Care Model as a framework, we carried out a mail-out survey to collect information on material, financial and human resources relating to chronic illness care in participating health centres. Follow up face-to-face interviews with health centre staff were conducted to identify successes and difficulties in the systems in relation to providing chronic illness care to community members. Results. Participating health centres had distinct areas of strength and weakness in each component of systems: 1) organisational influence - strengthened by inclusion of chronic illness goals in business plans, appointment of designated chronic disease coordinators and introduction of external clinical audits, but weakened by lack of training in disease prevention and health promotion and limited access to Medicare funding; 2) community linkages - facilitated by working together with community organisations (e.g. local stores) and running community-based programs (e.g. {"}health week{"}), but detracted by a shortage of staff especially of Aboriginal health workers working in the community; 3) self management - promoted through patient education and goal setting with clients, but impeded by limited focus on family and community-based activities due to understaffing; 4) decision support - facilitated by distribution of clinical guidelines and their integration with daily care, but limited by inadequate access to and support from specialists; 5) delivery system design - strengthened by provision of transport for clients to health centres, separate men's and women's clinic rooms, specific roles of primary care team members in relation to chronic illness care, effective teamwork, and functional pathology and pharmacy systems, but weakened by staff shortage (particularly doctors and Aboriginal health workers) and high staff turnover; and 6) clinical information systems - facilitated by wide adoption of computerised information systems, but weakened by the systems' complexity and lack of IT maintenance and upgrade support. Conclusion. Using concrete examples, this study translates the concept of the Chronic Care Model (and associated systems view) into practical application in Australian Indigenous primary care settings. This approach proved to be useful in understanding the quality of primary care systems for prevention and management of chronic illness. Further refinement of the systems should focus on both increasing human and financial resources and improving management practice. � 2008 Si et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.",
    keywords = "article, Australia, chronic disease, community care, follow up, funding, goal attainment, health care delivery, health care organization, health care quality, health insurance, health promotion, human, indigenous people, medical informatics, patient education, primary health care, problem identification, staff training, theoretical model, Aborigine, cross-sectional study, economics, epidemiology, ethnology, health center, health service, health services research, information system, interview, organization and management, statistics, Chronic Disease, Community Health Centers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Care Surveys, Health Services, Indigenous, Humans, Information Systems, Interviews as Topic, Oceanic Ancestry Group, Organizational Case Studies, Primary Health Care, Program Evaluation, Quality Indicators, Health Care",
    author = "Damin Si and Bailie, {Ross Stewart} and Joan Cunningham and Gary Robinson and Michelle Dowden and A STEWART and Christine Connors and Tarun Weeramanthri",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "112--126",
    journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
    issn = "1472-6963",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",

    }

    Describing and analysing primary health care system support for chronic illness care in Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory - Use of the Chronic Care Model. / Si, Damin; Bailie, Ross Stewart; Cunningham, Joan; Robinson, Gary; Dowden, Michelle; STEWART, A; Connors, Christine; Weeramanthri, Tarun.

    In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 8, 2008, p. 112-126.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Describing and analysing primary health care system support for chronic illness care in Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory - Use of the Chronic Care Model

    AU - Si, Damin

    AU - Bailie, Ross Stewart

    AU - Cunningham, Joan

    AU - Robinson, Gary

    AU - Dowden, Michelle

    AU - STEWART, A

    AU - Connors, Christine

    AU - Weeramanthri, Tarun

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Background. Indigenous Australians experience disproportionately high prevalence of, and morbidity and mortality from chronic illness such as diabetes, renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Improving the understanding of how Indigenous primary care systems are organised to deliver chronic illness care will inform efforts to improve the quality of care for Indigenous people. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory. Using the Chronic Care Model as a framework, we carried out a mail-out survey to collect information on material, financial and human resources relating to chronic illness care in participating health centres. Follow up face-to-face interviews with health centre staff were conducted to identify successes and difficulties in the systems in relation to providing chronic illness care to community members. Results. Participating health centres had distinct areas of strength and weakness in each component of systems: 1) organisational influence - strengthened by inclusion of chronic illness goals in business plans, appointment of designated chronic disease coordinators and introduction of external clinical audits, but weakened by lack of training in disease prevention and health promotion and limited access to Medicare funding; 2) community linkages - facilitated by working together with community organisations (e.g. local stores) and running community-based programs (e.g. "health week"), but detracted by a shortage of staff especially of Aboriginal health workers working in the community; 3) self management - promoted through patient education and goal setting with clients, but impeded by limited focus on family and community-based activities due to understaffing; 4) decision support - facilitated by distribution of clinical guidelines and their integration with daily care, but limited by inadequate access to and support from specialists; 5) delivery system design - strengthened by provision of transport for clients to health centres, separate men's and women's clinic rooms, specific roles of primary care team members in relation to chronic illness care, effective teamwork, and functional pathology and pharmacy systems, but weakened by staff shortage (particularly doctors and Aboriginal health workers) and high staff turnover; and 6) clinical information systems - facilitated by wide adoption of computerised information systems, but weakened by the systems' complexity and lack of IT maintenance and upgrade support. Conclusion. Using concrete examples, this study translates the concept of the Chronic Care Model (and associated systems view) into practical application in Australian Indigenous primary care settings. This approach proved to be useful in understanding the quality of primary care systems for prevention and management of chronic illness. Further refinement of the systems should focus on both increasing human and financial resources and improving management practice. � 2008 Si et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

    AB - Background. Indigenous Australians experience disproportionately high prevalence of, and morbidity and mortality from chronic illness such as diabetes, renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Improving the understanding of how Indigenous primary care systems are organised to deliver chronic illness care will inform efforts to improve the quality of care for Indigenous people. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory. Using the Chronic Care Model as a framework, we carried out a mail-out survey to collect information on material, financial and human resources relating to chronic illness care in participating health centres. Follow up face-to-face interviews with health centre staff were conducted to identify successes and difficulties in the systems in relation to providing chronic illness care to community members. Results. Participating health centres had distinct areas of strength and weakness in each component of systems: 1) organisational influence - strengthened by inclusion of chronic illness goals in business plans, appointment of designated chronic disease coordinators and introduction of external clinical audits, but weakened by lack of training in disease prevention and health promotion and limited access to Medicare funding; 2) community linkages - facilitated by working together with community organisations (e.g. local stores) and running community-based programs (e.g. "health week"), but detracted by a shortage of staff especially of Aboriginal health workers working in the community; 3) self management - promoted through patient education and goal setting with clients, but impeded by limited focus on family and community-based activities due to understaffing; 4) decision support - facilitated by distribution of clinical guidelines and their integration with daily care, but limited by inadequate access to and support from specialists; 5) delivery system design - strengthened by provision of transport for clients to health centres, separate men's and women's clinic rooms, specific roles of primary care team members in relation to chronic illness care, effective teamwork, and functional pathology and pharmacy systems, but weakened by staff shortage (particularly doctors and Aboriginal health workers) and high staff turnover; and 6) clinical information systems - facilitated by wide adoption of computerised information systems, but weakened by the systems' complexity and lack of IT maintenance and upgrade support. Conclusion. Using concrete examples, this study translates the concept of the Chronic Care Model (and associated systems view) into practical application in Australian Indigenous primary care settings. This approach proved to be useful in understanding the quality of primary care systems for prevention and management of chronic illness. Further refinement of the systems should focus on both increasing human and financial resources and improving management practice. � 2008 Si et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

    KW - article

    KW - Australia

    KW - chronic disease

    KW - community care

    KW - follow up

    KW - funding

    KW - goal attainment

    KW - health care delivery

    KW - health care organization

    KW - health care quality

    KW - health insurance

    KW - health promotion

    KW - human

    KW - indigenous people

    KW - medical informatics

    KW - patient education

    KW - primary health care

    KW - problem identification

    KW - staff training

    KW - theoretical model

    KW - Aborigine

    KW - cross-sectional study

    KW - economics

    KW - epidemiology

    KW - ethnology

    KW - health center

    KW - health service

    KW - health services research

    KW - information system

    KW - interview

    KW - organization and management

    KW - statistics

    KW - Chronic Disease

    KW - Community Health Centers

    KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

    KW - Health Care Surveys

    KW - Health Services, Indigenous

    KW - Humans

    KW - Information Systems

    KW - Interviews as Topic

    KW - Oceanic Ancestry Group

    KW - Organizational Case Studies

    KW - Primary Health Care

    KW - Program Evaluation

    KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 112

    EP - 126

    JO - BMC Health Services Research

    JF - BMC Health Services Research

    SN - 1472-6963

    ER -