Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation

Romy Greiner, Michiel Bliemer, Julie Ballweg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper reports on the experimental design process and considerations of a choice experiment conducted in collaboration with farmers in northern Australia. The purpose of the research is to inform the design of effective and efficient payments-for-ecosystem services schemes to safeguard north Australia's biodiversity values. It promotes the contractual provision of biodiversity conservation services by farmers, in particular pastoralists operating in Australia's tropical savannas. The paper focuses on the discrete choice experimental (DCE) aspects. The DCE is employed to estimate farmers' preference heterogeneity for supplying ecosystem services, specifically their willingness to accept remuneration for the on-farm conservation of biodiversity, based on potential programme attributes. The design of the choice experiment draws on best practice standards (Hoyos, 2010), a recognition of the benefits of embedding design in a consultative process (Klojgaard et al., 2012) and recent advances in accounting for response certainty (Brouwer et al., 2010; Hensher et al., 2012). DCE design decisions relating to attribute selection, attribute levels, alternatives and choice tasks are explained based on literature, focus group discussions, expert input and an iterative process of Bayesian D-efficient DCE design. Additional design aspects include measuring choice certainty and stated attribute attendance, embedding the DCE within a discrete-continuous approach, capturing relevant respondent-related attributes with socio-economic-psychological questions and scales, and devising appropriate data collection logistics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)34-45
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Choice Modelling
    Volume10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    Discrete Choice
    Biodiversity
    Conservation
    Likely
    Attribute
    Design of experiments
    Experimental design
    Estimate
    Ecosystems
    Experiment
    Ecosystem
    Experiments
    Farms
    Best Practice
    Logistics
    Iterative Process
    Design Process
    Economics
    Design
    Participation

    Cite this

    @article{c007f0acdd8942b9ac1e5274db568a76,
    title = "Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation",
    abstract = "This paper reports on the experimental design process and considerations of a choice experiment conducted in collaboration with farmers in northern Australia. The purpose of the research is to inform the design of effective and efficient payments-for-ecosystem services schemes to safeguard north Australia's biodiversity values. It promotes the contractual provision of biodiversity conservation services by farmers, in particular pastoralists operating in Australia's tropical savannas. The paper focuses on the discrete choice experimental (DCE) aspects. The DCE is employed to estimate farmers' preference heterogeneity for supplying ecosystem services, specifically their willingness to accept remuneration for the on-farm conservation of biodiversity, based on potential programme attributes. The design of the choice experiment draws on best practice standards (Hoyos, 2010), a recognition of the benefits of embedding design in a consultative process (Klojgaard et al., 2012) and recent advances in accounting for response certainty (Brouwer et al., 2010; Hensher et al., 2012). DCE design decisions relating to attribute selection, attribute levels, alternatives and choice tasks are explained based on literature, focus group discussions, expert input and an iterative process of Bayesian D-efficient DCE design. Additional design aspects include measuring choice certainty and stated attribute attendance, embedding the DCE within a discrete-continuous approach, capturing relevant respondent-related attributes with socio-economic-psychological questions and scales, and devising appropriate data collection logistics.",
    author = "Romy Greiner and Michiel Bliemer and Julie Ballweg",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "34--45",
    journal = "Journal of Choice Modelling",
    issn = "1755-5345",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation. / Greiner, Romy; Bliemer, Michiel; Ballweg, Julie.

    In: Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 10, 03.2014, p. 34-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation

    AU - Greiner, Romy

    AU - Bliemer, Michiel

    AU - Ballweg, Julie

    PY - 2014/3

    Y1 - 2014/3

    N2 - This paper reports on the experimental design process and considerations of a choice experiment conducted in collaboration with farmers in northern Australia. The purpose of the research is to inform the design of effective and efficient payments-for-ecosystem services schemes to safeguard north Australia's biodiversity values. It promotes the contractual provision of biodiversity conservation services by farmers, in particular pastoralists operating in Australia's tropical savannas. The paper focuses on the discrete choice experimental (DCE) aspects. The DCE is employed to estimate farmers' preference heterogeneity for supplying ecosystem services, specifically their willingness to accept remuneration for the on-farm conservation of biodiversity, based on potential programme attributes. The design of the choice experiment draws on best practice standards (Hoyos, 2010), a recognition of the benefits of embedding design in a consultative process (Klojgaard et al., 2012) and recent advances in accounting for response certainty (Brouwer et al., 2010; Hensher et al., 2012). DCE design decisions relating to attribute selection, attribute levels, alternatives and choice tasks are explained based on literature, focus group discussions, expert input and an iterative process of Bayesian D-efficient DCE design. Additional design aspects include measuring choice certainty and stated attribute attendance, embedding the DCE within a discrete-continuous approach, capturing relevant respondent-related attributes with socio-economic-psychological questions and scales, and devising appropriate data collection logistics.

    AB - This paper reports on the experimental design process and considerations of a choice experiment conducted in collaboration with farmers in northern Australia. The purpose of the research is to inform the design of effective and efficient payments-for-ecosystem services schemes to safeguard north Australia's biodiversity values. It promotes the contractual provision of biodiversity conservation services by farmers, in particular pastoralists operating in Australia's tropical savannas. The paper focuses on the discrete choice experimental (DCE) aspects. The DCE is employed to estimate farmers' preference heterogeneity for supplying ecosystem services, specifically their willingness to accept remuneration for the on-farm conservation of biodiversity, based on potential programme attributes. The design of the choice experiment draws on best practice standards (Hoyos, 2010), a recognition of the benefits of embedding design in a consultative process (Klojgaard et al., 2012) and recent advances in accounting for response certainty (Brouwer et al., 2010; Hensher et al., 2012). DCE design decisions relating to attribute selection, attribute levels, alternatives and choice tasks are explained based on literature, focus group discussions, expert input and an iterative process of Bayesian D-efficient DCE design. Additional design aspects include measuring choice certainty and stated attribute attendance, embedding the DCE within a discrete-continuous approach, capturing relevant respondent-related attributes with socio-economic-psychological questions and scales, and devising appropriate data collection logistics.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 34

    EP - 45

    JO - Journal of Choice Modelling

    JF - Journal of Choice Modelling

    SN - 1755-5345

    ER -