Determinants and Gaps in Preventive Care Delivery for Indigenous Australians: A Cross-sectional Analysis

Christopher Bailie, Veronica Matthews, Jodie Bailie, Paul Burgess, Kerry Copley, Catherine Kennedy, Elizabeth Moore, Sarah Larkins, Sandra Thompson, Ross Stewart Bailie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Potentially preventable chronic diseases are the greatest contributor to the health gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-­Indigenous Australians. Preventive care is important for earlier detection and control of chronic disease, and a number of recent policy initiatives have aimed to enhance delivery of preventive care. We examined documented delivery of recommended preventive services for Indigenous peoples across Australia and investigated the influence of health center and client level factors on adherence to best practice guidelines.

Methods: Clinical audit data from 2012 to 2014 for 3,623 well adult clients (aged 15–54) of 101 health centers from four Australian states and territories were analyzed to determine adherence to delivery of 26 recommended preventive services classified into five different modes of care on the basis of the way in which they are delivered (e.g., basic measurement; laboratory tests and imaging; assessment and brief interventions, eye, ear, and oral checks; follow-up of abnormal findings). Summary statistics were used to describe the delivery of each service item across jurisdictions. Multilevel regression models were used to quantify the variation in service delivery attributable to health center and client level factors and to identify factors associated with higher quality care.

Results: Delivery of recommended preventive care varied widely between service items, with good delivery of most basic measurements but poor follow-up of abnormal findings. Health center characteristics were associated with most variation. Higher quality care was associated with Northern Territory location, urban services, and smaller service population size. Client factors associated with higher quality care included age between 25 and 34 years, female sex, and more regular attendance.

Conclusion: Wide variation in documented preventive care delivery, poor follow-up of abnormal findings, and system factors that influence quality of care should be addressed through continuous quality improvement approaches that engage stakeholders at multiple levels (including, for example, access to care in the community, appropriate decision support for practitioners, and financial incentives and context appropriate guidelines).
Original languageEnglish
Article number34
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants and Gaps in Preventive Care Delivery for Indigenous Australians: A Cross-sectional Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this