Dominance–diversity relationships in ant communities differ with invasion

Xavier Arnan, Alan N. Andersen, Heloise Gibb, Catherine L. Parr, Nathan J. Sanders, Robert R. Dunn, Elena Angulo, Fabricio B. Baccaro, Tom R. Bishop, Raphaël Boulay, Cristina Castracani, Xim Cerdá, Israel Del Toro, Thibaut Delsinne, David A. Donoso, Emilie K. Elten, Tom M. Fayle, Matthew C. Fitzpatrick, Crisanto Gómez, Donato A. GrassoBlair F. Grossman, Benoit Guénard, Nihara Gunawardene, Brian Heterick, Benjamin D. Hoffmann, Milan Janda, Clinton N. Jenkins, Petr Klimes, Lori Lach, Thomas Laeger, Maurice Leponce, Andrea Lucky, Jonathan Majer, Sean Menke, Dirk Mezger, Alessandra Mori, Jimmy Moses, Thinandavha Caswell Munyai, Omid Paknia, Martin Pfeiffer, Stacy M. Philpott, Jorge L.P. Souza, Melanie Tista, Heraldo L. Vasconcelos, Javier Retana

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The relationship between levels of dominance and species richness is highly contentious, especially in ant communities. The dominance-impoverishment rule states that high levels of dominance only occur in species-poor communities, but there appear to be many cases of high levels of dominance in highly diverse communities. The extent to which dominant species limit local richness through competitive exclusion remains unclear, but such exclusion appears more apparent for non-native rather than native dominant species. Here we perform the first global analysis of the relationship between behavioral dominance and species richness. We used data from 1,293 local assemblages of ground-dwelling ants distributed across five continents to document the generality of the dominance-impoverishment rule, and to identify the biotic and abiotic conditions under which it does and does not apply. We found that the behavioral dominance–diversity relationship varies greatly, and depends on whether dominant species are native or non-native, whether dominance is considered as occurrence or relative abundance, and on variation in mean annual temperature. There were declines in diversity with increasing dominance in invaded communities, but diversity increased with increasing dominance in native communities. These patterns occur along the global temperature gradient. However, positive and negative relationships are strongest in the hottest sites. We also found that climate regulates the degree of behavioral dominance, but differently from how it shapes species richness. Our findings imply that, despite strong competitive interactions among ants, competitive exclusion is not a major driver of local richness in native ant communities. Although the dominance-impoverishment rule applies to invaded communities, we propose an alternative dominance-diversification rule for native communities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4614-4625
    Number of pages12
    JournalGlobal Change Biology
    Volume24
    Issue number10
    Early online date30 May 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dominance–diversity relationships in ant communities differ with invasion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Arnan, X., Andersen, A. N., Gibb, H., Parr, C. L., Sanders, N. J., Dunn, R. R., Angulo, E., Baccaro, F. B., Bishop, T. R., Boulay, R., Castracani, C., Cerdá, X., Toro, I. D., Delsinne, T., Donoso, D. A., Elten, E. K., Fayle, T. M., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Gómez, C., ... Retana, J. (2018). Dominance–diversity relationships in ant communities differ with invasion. Global Change Biology, 24(10), 4614-4625. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14331