Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy

Andrew Klassen

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paper presented at Conference (not in Proceedings)Research

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple indicators of economic performance are important for public satisfaction with democracy, but it is uncertain at which levels different economic indicators have positive or negative effects on satisfaction with democracy.

Purpose: The aim of this article is to determine the value ranges of key economic indicators that are associated with maximum and minimum levels of satisfaction with democracy..

Methods: This correlational cross-sectional study aggregates over 3.2 million survey respondents in 147 countries between 1973 and 2016. The analysis utilises bivariate regressions, data visualisation, and multilevel random-effects models.

Results: Positive effects on democratic satisfaction are significant when real interest rates are below 3.5%, gross national savings are above 23% of gross domestic product (GDP), government budget balances are above -1.6% of GDP, government debt is below 30% of GDP, unemployment is below 5.5%, inflation is between 1.8% and 2.8%, GDP growth is above 4.2%, and gross national income per capita is above US$33,000.

Conclusion: The indicators in this study collectively explain about a third of the variation in democratic satisfaction, illustrating the importance of a healthy economy and sound government finances. The ranges resulting from this study provide concrete guidance for public policy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-21
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventAustralian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference - Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Duration: 25 Sep 201727 Sep 2017

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne, VIC
Period25/09/1727/09/17

Fingerprint

Government
Economic performance
Democracy
Finance
Gross domestic product
Economic indicators
Government debt
National income
Unemployment
Budget balance
Data visualization
National saving
Public policy
Inflation
Cross-sectional studies
Guidance
Government budget
Random effects model

Cite this

Klassen, A. (2017). Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy. 1-21. Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Klassen, Andrew. / Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.21 p.
@conference{266d79899bfd4002ac8b9f1975ed2dfd,
title = "Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy",
abstract = "Introduction: Multiple indicators of economic performance are important for public satisfaction with democracy, but it is uncertain at which levels different economic indicators have positive or negative effects on satisfaction with democracy.Purpose: The aim of this article is to determine the value ranges of key economic indicators that are associated with maximum and minimum levels of satisfaction with democracy..Methods: This correlational cross-sectional study aggregates over 3.2 million survey respondents in 147 countries between 1973 and 2016. The analysis utilises bivariate regressions, data visualisation, and multilevel random-effects models.Results: Positive effects on democratic satisfaction are significant when real interest rates are below 3.5{\%}, gross national savings are above 23{\%} of gross domestic product (GDP), government budget balances are above -1.6{\%} of GDP, government debt is below 30{\%} of GDP, unemployment is below 5.5{\%}, inflation is between 1.8{\%} and 2.8{\%}, GDP growth is above 4.2{\%}, and gross national income per capita is above US$33,000.Conclusion: The indicators in this study collectively explain about a third of the variation in democratic satisfaction, illustrating the importance of a healthy economy and sound government finances. The ranges resulting from this study provide concrete guidance for public policy.",
keywords = "satisfaction with democracy, economic performance, government finances",
author = "Andrew Klassen",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
note = "Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference ; Conference date: 25-09-2017 Through 27-09-2017",

}

Klassen, A 2017, 'Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy' Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 25/09/17 - 27/09/17, pp. 1-21.

Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy. / Klassen, Andrew.

2017. 1-21 Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paper presented at Conference (not in Proceedings)Research

TY - CONF

T1 - Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy

AU - Klassen, Andrew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction: Multiple indicators of economic performance are important for public satisfaction with democracy, but it is uncertain at which levels different economic indicators have positive or negative effects on satisfaction with democracy.Purpose: The aim of this article is to determine the value ranges of key economic indicators that are associated with maximum and minimum levels of satisfaction with democracy..Methods: This correlational cross-sectional study aggregates over 3.2 million survey respondents in 147 countries between 1973 and 2016. The analysis utilises bivariate regressions, data visualisation, and multilevel random-effects models.Results: Positive effects on democratic satisfaction are significant when real interest rates are below 3.5%, gross national savings are above 23% of gross domestic product (GDP), government budget balances are above -1.6% of GDP, government debt is below 30% of GDP, unemployment is below 5.5%, inflation is between 1.8% and 2.8%, GDP growth is above 4.2%, and gross national income per capita is above US$33,000.Conclusion: The indicators in this study collectively explain about a third of the variation in democratic satisfaction, illustrating the importance of a healthy economy and sound government finances. The ranges resulting from this study provide concrete guidance for public policy.

AB - Introduction: Multiple indicators of economic performance are important for public satisfaction with democracy, but it is uncertain at which levels different economic indicators have positive or negative effects on satisfaction with democracy.Purpose: The aim of this article is to determine the value ranges of key economic indicators that are associated with maximum and minimum levels of satisfaction with democracy..Methods: This correlational cross-sectional study aggregates over 3.2 million survey respondents in 147 countries between 1973 and 2016. The analysis utilises bivariate regressions, data visualisation, and multilevel random-effects models.Results: Positive effects on democratic satisfaction are significant when real interest rates are below 3.5%, gross national savings are above 23% of gross domestic product (GDP), government budget balances are above -1.6% of GDP, government debt is below 30% of GDP, unemployment is below 5.5%, inflation is between 1.8% and 2.8%, GDP growth is above 4.2%, and gross national income per capita is above US$33,000.Conclusion: The indicators in this study collectively explain about a third of the variation in democratic satisfaction, illustrating the importance of a healthy economy and sound government finances. The ranges resulting from this study provide concrete guidance for public policy.

KW - satisfaction with democracy

KW - economic performance

KW - government finances

UR - https://www.auspsa.org.au/page/apsa-conference-2017

M3 - Conference paper presented at Conference (not in Proceedings)

SP - 1

EP - 21

ER -

Klassen A. Economic Performance, Government Finances, and Satisfaction with Democracy. 2017. Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association 2017 Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.