TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of the FRP sheet's arrays and NSM FRP bars on in-plane behavior of URM walls
AU - Jafari, Armin
AU - Oskouei, Asghar Vatani
AU - Bazli, Milad
AU - Ghahri, Rasool
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - This paper studies the results of compression diagonal tests conducted on a series of retrofitted and non-retrofitted small-scale masonry walls (which are also known as wallettes). Wallettes with the same characteristics and mechanical properties of large masonry walls were retrofitted by using two arrays of glass fiber reinforcement polymer (GFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), two arrays of carbon fiber reinforcement polymer (CFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), and near surface mounted bars (steel and GFRP). FRP sheets were applied to both surfaces of the wallettes, and rebar was mounted onto one of the surfaces in two horizontal and two vertical arrangements. All of the methods significantly increased loading capability and ductility of wallettes. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface GFRP bars had the highest value of final load, and specimens retrofitted with CFRP sheets in a diagonal array demonstrated the highest ductility among all tested specimens. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface mounted steel bars showed poor performance in terms of both loading capability and ductility. This study also includes discussion of failure modes, elastic characteristics, shear stresses and strains, and other variables that impact retrofitting.
AB - This paper studies the results of compression diagonal tests conducted on a series of retrofitted and non-retrofitted small-scale masonry walls (which are also known as wallettes). Wallettes with the same characteristics and mechanical properties of large masonry walls were retrofitted by using two arrays of glass fiber reinforcement polymer (GFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), two arrays of carbon fiber reinforcement polymer (CFRP) sheets (grid and diagonal), and near surface mounted bars (steel and GFRP). FRP sheets were applied to both surfaces of the wallettes, and rebar was mounted onto one of the surfaces in two horizontal and two vertical arrangements. All of the methods significantly increased loading capability and ductility of wallettes. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface GFRP bars had the highest value of final load, and specimens retrofitted with CFRP sheets in a diagonal array demonstrated the highest ductility among all tested specimens. Wallettes retrofitted with near surface mounted steel bars showed poor performance in terms of both loading capability and ductility. This study also includes discussion of failure modes, elastic characteristics, shear stresses and strains, and other variables that impact retrofitting.
KW - Diagonal compression test
KW - Fiber reinforcement polymer
KW - FRP sheets
KW - In-plane test
KW - Masonry
KW - Near surface mounted bar
KW - Retrofitting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053822987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.018
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053822987
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 20
SP - 679
EP - 695
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
ER -