Eliciting mental models of science and risk for disaster communication: A scoping review of methodologies

Emma E.H. Doyle, Sara E. Harrison, Stephen R. Hill, Matt Williams, Douglas Paton, Ann Bostrom

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    54 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We present a scoping review of methods used to elicit individuals' mental models of science or risk. Developing a shared understanding of the science related to risk is crucial for diverse individuals to collaboratively manage disaster consequences. Mental models, or people's psychological representation of how the ‘world works’, present a valuable tool to achieve this. Potential applications range from developing effective risk communication for use in short-warning situations to community co-development of future communication protocols for the co-management of risk. A diverse range of tools, in diverse fields, have thus been developed to elicit these mental models. Forty-four articles were selected via inclusion criteria from 561 found through a systematic search. We identified a wide range of direct and indirect elicitation techniques (concept, cognitive, flow, information world, knowledge, mind, and fuzzy cognitive maps, and decision influence diagrams) and interview-based techniques. Many used multiple elicitation techniques such as free-drawing, interviews, free-listing, sorting tasks, attitudinal surveys, photograph elicitation, metaphor analysis, and mapping software. We identify several challenges when designing elicitation methods, including researcher influence, the importance of external visualization, a lack of evaluation, the role of ‘experts’, and ethical considerations due to the influence of the process itself. We present a preliminary typology for elicitation and analysis and suggest future research should explore methods to assess the evolution of mental models to understand how conceptualisations change through time, experience, or public education programs. These lessons have the potential to benefit both science and disaster risk communication activities, given best practice calls for mutually constructed understanding.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number103084
    Pages (from-to)1-23
    Number of pages23
    JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
    Volume77
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    This research was supported by Massey University Research funding 2020 & 2021, and public research funding from the Government of New Zealand. EEHD is supported by the National Science Challenges: Resilience to Nature's Challenges | Kia manawaroa – Ngā Ākina o Te Ao Tūroa 2019–2024; and (partially) supported by QuakeCoRE | Te Hiranga Rū – Aotearoa NZ Centre for Earthquake Resilience 2021, a New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission-funded Centre. This is QuakeCoRE publication number 0723. EEHD also thanks Dr Julia Becker for valuable comments throughout various stages of the wider project, and two anonymous reviewers for suggestions that have improved this manuscript.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2022 The Authors

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Eliciting mental models of science and risk for disaster communication: A scoping review of methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this