Employment driven online student attrition and the assessment policy divide

An Australian open access higher education perspective

Catherine Moore, Steven Greenland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Two hundred and twenty-six qualitative interviews with students studying at Australia’slargest online tertiary education organisation, Open Universities Australia (OUA), found thatfailure to complete assessments due to unexpected and unavoidable employmentcommitments was the standout reason for dropping out of its open-access courses. Theassessment policies of 10 Australian universities that teach the OUA tertiary programmeswere then reviewed to evaluate the extent to which employment-related circumstances wereconsidered to be grounds for granting concessions and extensions. Half of these institutions’policies did not mention employment as an extenuating circumstance, others made onlypassing reference, and one specifically stated that work was not a valid reason for anassignment extension. In this regard, online students may not be receiving the flexible andaccessible learning that online education is purported to provide. This situation highlights abroader issue, in that many online educators are using policies and protocols that aredesigned for traditional on-campus students without adequate adaptation for the onlinelearner. Considerable scope therefore exists for improving online learner satisfaction andretention by more effectively accommodating online student characteristics and needs. 
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)52-62
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    open access
    education
    student
    concession
    qualitative interview
    educator
    university
    learning

    Cite this

    @article{ee4782ee55994c49aac15a4c6cd21d6f,
    title = "Employment driven online student attrition and the assessment policy divide: An Australian open access higher education perspective",
    abstract = "Two hundred and twenty-six qualitative interviews with students studying at Australia’slargest online tertiary education organisation, Open Universities Australia (OUA), found thatfailure to complete assessments due to unexpected and unavoidable employmentcommitments was the standout reason for dropping out of its open-access courses. Theassessment policies of 10 Australian universities that teach the OUA tertiary programmeswere then reviewed to evaluate the extent to which employment-related circumstances wereconsidered to be grounds for granting concessions and extensions. Half of these institutions’policies did not mention employment as an extenuating circumstance, others made onlypassing reference, and one specifically stated that work was not a valid reason for anassignment extension. In this regard, online students may not be receiving the flexible andaccessible learning that online education is purported to provide. This situation highlights abroader issue, in that many online educators are using policies and protocols that aredesigned for traditional on-campus students without adequate adaptation for the onlinelearner. Considerable scope therefore exists for improving online learner satisfaction andretention by more effectively accommodating online student characteristics and needs. ",
    author = "Catherine Moore and Steven Greenland",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "52--62",
    journal = "Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning",
    issn = "1173-5945",
    publisher = "Distance Education Association of New Zealand",
    number = "1",

    }

    Employment driven online student attrition and the assessment policy divide : An Australian open access higher education perspective. / Moore, Catherine; Greenland, Steven.

    In: Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2017, p. 52-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Employment driven online student attrition and the assessment policy divide

    T2 - An Australian open access higher education perspective

    AU - Moore, Catherine

    AU - Greenland, Steven

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Two hundred and twenty-six qualitative interviews with students studying at Australia’slargest online tertiary education organisation, Open Universities Australia (OUA), found thatfailure to complete assessments due to unexpected and unavoidable employmentcommitments was the standout reason for dropping out of its open-access courses. Theassessment policies of 10 Australian universities that teach the OUA tertiary programmeswere then reviewed to evaluate the extent to which employment-related circumstances wereconsidered to be grounds for granting concessions and extensions. Half of these institutions’policies did not mention employment as an extenuating circumstance, others made onlypassing reference, and one specifically stated that work was not a valid reason for anassignment extension. In this regard, online students may not be receiving the flexible andaccessible learning that online education is purported to provide. This situation highlights abroader issue, in that many online educators are using policies and protocols that aredesigned for traditional on-campus students without adequate adaptation for the onlinelearner. Considerable scope therefore exists for improving online learner satisfaction andretention by more effectively accommodating online student characteristics and needs. 

    AB - Two hundred and twenty-six qualitative interviews with students studying at Australia’slargest online tertiary education organisation, Open Universities Australia (OUA), found thatfailure to complete assessments due to unexpected and unavoidable employmentcommitments was the standout reason for dropping out of its open-access courses. Theassessment policies of 10 Australian universities that teach the OUA tertiary programmeswere then reviewed to evaluate the extent to which employment-related circumstances wereconsidered to be grounds for granting concessions and extensions. Half of these institutions’policies did not mention employment as an extenuating circumstance, others made onlypassing reference, and one specifically stated that work was not a valid reason for anassignment extension. In this regard, online students may not be receiving the flexible andaccessible learning that online education is purported to provide. This situation highlights abroader issue, in that many online educators are using policies and protocols that aredesigned for traditional on-campus students without adequate adaptation for the onlinelearner. Considerable scope therefore exists for improving online learner satisfaction andretention by more effectively accommodating online student characteristics and needs. 

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 52

    EP - 62

    JO - Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning

    JF - Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning

    SN - 1173-5945

    IS - 1

    ER -