Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services

Siva Vemuri, Julian Gorman

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Paper published in ProceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    There is evidence to suggest that for >60,000 years prior to European colonisation, Indigenous Australians used ecosystem services and managed landscapes sustainably. Since that time and in the wet/dry tropics of the Northern Territory, fire, weeds and feral animals have had, and continue to have, the greatest influence on landscapes and the ecosystem services they provide. Internationally, the links between Indigenous people and their experiences with natural and cultural resource management has been recognized and now have become an important and popular strategy for promoting sustainable development. Indigenous Natural and Cultural Resource Management (INCRM) is particularly relevant in the Northern Territory of Australia and has contributed to the formation of an Indigenous ranger program to manage threats to the landscape in conjunction with customary land management practice from Aboriginal people still living on their country. A closer examination of the success of INCRM suggests that the real challenge is one of managing knowledge pluralism rather than finding a common base for the different sources of knowledge. More recently these landscapes have been subject to a number of additional threats (spread of disease from feral animals, illegal international fishing vessels, exotic ant control, fire abatement etc), which still require management at a local level. Many of these are currently being managed under a payment for environmental service (PES) type arrangement. While PES has great public cost-benefit, it needs to be determined if the model provides the best mechanism for the progress of Indigenous people. This paper is about the intricacies of issues related with linking knowledge of Indigenous people with provision of ecosystem services and will conclude the ongoing commitment of PES to sustainable development.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
    Place of Publicationonline
    PublisherWIT Press
    Pages-
    Number of pages12
    Volume131
    ISBN (Print)1743-3541
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    EventEnvironmental Economics III -
    Duration: 1 Jan 20101 Jan 2010

    Conference

    ConferenceEnvironmental Economics III
    Period1/01/101/01/10

    Fingerprint

    ecosystem service
    resource management
    natural resource
    sustainable development
    fishing vessel
    indigenous population
    animal
    land management
    ant
    weed
    management practice
    colonization
    services

    Cite this

    Vemuri, S., & Gorman, J. (2010). Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services. In WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (Vol. 131, pp. -). online: WIT Press.
    Vemuri, Siva ; Gorman, Julian. / Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 131 online : WIT Press, 2010. pp. -
    @inproceedings{8bad2d215ce34867812606cb010396eb,
    title = "Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services",
    abstract = "There is evidence to suggest that for >60,000 years prior to European colonisation, Indigenous Australians used ecosystem services and managed landscapes sustainably. Since that time and in the wet/dry tropics of the Northern Territory, fire, weeds and feral animals have had, and continue to have, the greatest influence on landscapes and the ecosystem services they provide. Internationally, the links between Indigenous people and their experiences with natural and cultural resource management has been recognized and now have become an important and popular strategy for promoting sustainable development. Indigenous Natural and Cultural Resource Management (INCRM) is particularly relevant in the Northern Territory of Australia and has contributed to the formation of an Indigenous ranger program to manage threats to the landscape in conjunction with customary land management practice from Aboriginal people still living on their country. A closer examination of the success of INCRM suggests that the real challenge is one of managing knowledge pluralism rather than finding a common base for the different sources of knowledge. More recently these landscapes have been subject to a number of additional threats (spread of disease from feral animals, illegal international fishing vessels, exotic ant control, fire abatement etc), which still require management at a local level. Many of these are currently being managed under a payment for environmental service (PES) type arrangement. While PES has great public cost-benefit, it needs to be determined if the model provides the best mechanism for the progress of Indigenous people. This paper is about the intricacies of issues related with linking knowledge of Indigenous people with provision of ecosystem services and will conclude the ongoing commitment of PES to sustainable development.",
    keywords = "conference proceeding, cost-benefit analysis, ecosystem service, environmental management, governance approach, holistic approach, indigenous population, natural resource, resource management, service provision, sustainable development, Australia, Northern Territory, Animalia",
    author = "Siva Vemuri and Julian Gorman",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "1743-3541",
    volume = "131",
    pages = "--",
    booktitle = "WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment",
    publisher = "WIT Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Vemuri, S & Gorman, J 2010, Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services. in WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. vol. 131, WIT Press, online, pp. -, Environmental Economics III, 1/01/10.

    Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services. / Vemuri, Siva; Gorman, Julian.

    WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 131 online : WIT Press, 2010. p. -.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Paper published in ProceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services

    AU - Vemuri, Siva

    AU - Gorman, Julian

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - There is evidence to suggest that for >60,000 years prior to European colonisation, Indigenous Australians used ecosystem services and managed landscapes sustainably. Since that time and in the wet/dry tropics of the Northern Territory, fire, weeds and feral animals have had, and continue to have, the greatest influence on landscapes and the ecosystem services they provide. Internationally, the links between Indigenous people and their experiences with natural and cultural resource management has been recognized and now have become an important and popular strategy for promoting sustainable development. Indigenous Natural and Cultural Resource Management (INCRM) is particularly relevant in the Northern Territory of Australia and has contributed to the formation of an Indigenous ranger program to manage threats to the landscape in conjunction with customary land management practice from Aboriginal people still living on their country. A closer examination of the success of INCRM suggests that the real challenge is one of managing knowledge pluralism rather than finding a common base for the different sources of knowledge. More recently these landscapes have been subject to a number of additional threats (spread of disease from feral animals, illegal international fishing vessels, exotic ant control, fire abatement etc), which still require management at a local level. Many of these are currently being managed under a payment for environmental service (PES) type arrangement. While PES has great public cost-benefit, it needs to be determined if the model provides the best mechanism for the progress of Indigenous people. This paper is about the intricacies of issues related with linking knowledge of Indigenous people with provision of ecosystem services and will conclude the ongoing commitment of PES to sustainable development.

    AB - There is evidence to suggest that for >60,000 years prior to European colonisation, Indigenous Australians used ecosystem services and managed landscapes sustainably. Since that time and in the wet/dry tropics of the Northern Territory, fire, weeds and feral animals have had, and continue to have, the greatest influence on landscapes and the ecosystem services they provide. Internationally, the links between Indigenous people and their experiences with natural and cultural resource management has been recognized and now have become an important and popular strategy for promoting sustainable development. Indigenous Natural and Cultural Resource Management (INCRM) is particularly relevant in the Northern Territory of Australia and has contributed to the formation of an Indigenous ranger program to manage threats to the landscape in conjunction with customary land management practice from Aboriginal people still living on their country. A closer examination of the success of INCRM suggests that the real challenge is one of managing knowledge pluralism rather than finding a common base for the different sources of knowledge. More recently these landscapes have been subject to a number of additional threats (spread of disease from feral animals, illegal international fishing vessels, exotic ant control, fire abatement etc), which still require management at a local level. Many of these are currently being managed under a payment for environmental service (PES) type arrangement. While PES has great public cost-benefit, it needs to be determined if the model provides the best mechanism for the progress of Indigenous people. This paper is about the intricacies of issues related with linking knowledge of Indigenous people with provision of ecosystem services and will conclude the ongoing commitment of PES to sustainable development.

    KW - conference proceeding

    KW - cost-benefit analysis

    KW - ecosystem service

    KW - environmental management

    KW - governance approach

    KW - holistic approach

    KW - indigenous population

    KW - natural resource

    KW - resource management

    KW - service provision

    KW - sustainable development

    KW - Australia

    KW - Northern Territory

    KW - Animalia

    M3 - Conference Paper published in Proceedings

    SN - 1743-3541

    VL - 131

    SP - -

    BT - WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

    PB - WIT Press

    CY - online

    ER -

    Vemuri S, Gorman J. Enhancing natural resource management through payment for ecosystem services. In WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 131. online: WIT Press. 2010. p. -