Abstract
Introduction: In February 2018 the Remote Medical Practitioner (RMP)-led telehealth model for providing both primary care advice and aeromedical retrievals in Central Australia was replaced by the Medical Retrieval and Consultation Centre (MRaCC) and Remote Outreach Consultation Centre (ROCC). In this new model, specialists with advanced critical care skills provide telehealth consultations for emergencies 24/7 and afterhours primary care advice (MRaCC) while RMPs (general practitioners) provide primary care telehealth advice in business hours via the separate ROCC. Objective: To evaluate changes in clinicians’ perceptions of efficiency and timeliness of the new (MRaCC) and (ROCC) model in Central Australia. Design: There were 103 and 72 respondents, respectively, to pre- and post-implementation surveys of remote clinicians and specialist staff. Findings: Both emergency and primary care aspects of telehealth support were perceived as being significantly more timely and efficient under the newly introduced MRaCC/ROCC model. Importantly, health professionals in remote community were more likely to feel that their access to clinical support during emergencies was consistent and immediately available. Discussion: Respondents consistently perceived the new MRaCC/ROCC model more favourably than the previous RMP-led model, suggesting that there are benefits to having separate referral streams for telehealth advice for primary health care and emergencies, and staffing the emergency stream with specialists with advanced critical care skills. Conclusion: Given the paucity of literature about optimal models for providing pre-hospital medical care to remote residents, the findings have substantial local, national and international relevance and implications, particularly in similar geographically large countries, with low population density.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 322-335 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Rural Health |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 9 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The research reported in this paper is a project of Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, supported by funding through the Central Australia Academic Health Science Network (disbursing Australian government Medical Research Future Funds) and Central Australian Health Services. The information and opinions contained in it do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Central Australia Academic Health Science Network, the Australian government, or Central Australian Health Services.