Examining the Impact of ABRACADABRA on EarlyLiteracy in Northern Australia

An Implementation Fidelity Analysis

Jennifer Wolgemuth, Philip Abrami, Janet Helmer, Robert Savage, Helen Harper, Tess Lea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To address students poor literacy outcomes, an intervention using a computer-based literacy tool, ABRACADABRA, was implemented in 6 Northern Australia primary schools. A pretest, posttest parallel group, single blind multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted with 308 students between the ages of 4 and 8 years old (M age = 5.8 years, SD = 0.8 years). Findings suggested that computer-based instruction under controlled conditions can improve student literacy, especially for Indigenous students at risk of reading difficulties. The authors examine the fidelity with which the computer-based literacy tool was implemented and the impact of implementation fidelity measures on student outcomes. Student exposure to and use of the literacy tool, and quality of instruction and lesson delivery, were analyzed for their influence on students literacy outcomes. Implementation fidelity measures accounted for between 1.8% and 15% of the variance of intervention students scores. � 2014 Copyright � Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-311
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

literacy
student
instruction
primary school
Group

Cite this

Wolgemuth, Jennifer ; Abrami, Philip ; Helmer, Janet ; Savage, Robert ; Harper, Helen ; Lea, Tess. / Examining the Impact of ABRACADABRA on EarlyLiteracy in Northern Australia : An Implementation Fidelity Analysis. In: Journal of Educational Research. 2014 ; Vol. 107, No. 4. pp. 299-311.
@article{789e6e5f28ff4c04bef3e63589239dd2,
title = "Examining the Impact of ABRACADABRA on EarlyLiteracy in Northern Australia: An Implementation Fidelity Analysis",
abstract = "To address students poor literacy outcomes, an intervention using a computer-based literacy tool, ABRACADABRA, was implemented in 6 Northern Australia primary schools. A pretest, posttest parallel group, single blind multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted with 308 students between the ages of 4 and 8 years old (M age = 5.8 years, SD = 0.8 years). Findings suggested that computer-based instruction under controlled conditions can improve student literacy, especially for Indigenous students at risk of reading difficulties. The authors examine the fidelity with which the computer-based literacy tool was implemented and the impact of implementation fidelity measures on student outcomes. Student exposure to and use of the literacy tool, and quality of instruction and lesson delivery, were analyzed for their influence on students literacy outcomes. Implementation fidelity measures accounted for between 1.8{\%} and 15{\%} of the variance of intervention students scores. � 2014 Copyright � Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
author = "Jennifer Wolgemuth and Philip Abrami and Janet Helmer and Robert Savage and Helen Harper and Tess Lea",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00220671.2013.823369",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "299--311",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Examining the Impact of ABRACADABRA on EarlyLiteracy in Northern Australia : An Implementation Fidelity Analysis. / Wolgemuth, Jennifer; Abrami, Philip; Helmer, Janet; Savage, Robert; Harper, Helen; Lea, Tess.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 107, No. 4, 04.07.2014, p. 299-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Impact of ABRACADABRA on EarlyLiteracy in Northern Australia

T2 - An Implementation Fidelity Analysis

AU - Wolgemuth, Jennifer

AU - Abrami, Philip

AU - Helmer, Janet

AU - Savage, Robert

AU - Harper, Helen

AU - Lea, Tess

PY - 2014/7/4

Y1 - 2014/7/4

N2 - To address students poor literacy outcomes, an intervention using a computer-based literacy tool, ABRACADABRA, was implemented in 6 Northern Australia primary schools. A pretest, posttest parallel group, single blind multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted with 308 students between the ages of 4 and 8 years old (M age = 5.8 years, SD = 0.8 years). Findings suggested that computer-based instruction under controlled conditions can improve student literacy, especially for Indigenous students at risk of reading difficulties. The authors examine the fidelity with which the computer-based literacy tool was implemented and the impact of implementation fidelity measures on student outcomes. Student exposure to and use of the literacy tool, and quality of instruction and lesson delivery, were analyzed for their influence on students literacy outcomes. Implementation fidelity measures accounted for between 1.8% and 15% of the variance of intervention students scores. � 2014 Copyright � Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

AB - To address students poor literacy outcomes, an intervention using a computer-based literacy tool, ABRACADABRA, was implemented in 6 Northern Australia primary schools. A pretest, posttest parallel group, single blind multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted with 308 students between the ages of 4 and 8 years old (M age = 5.8 years, SD = 0.8 years). Findings suggested that computer-based instruction under controlled conditions can improve student literacy, especially for Indigenous students at risk of reading difficulties. The authors examine the fidelity with which the computer-based literacy tool was implemented and the impact of implementation fidelity measures on student outcomes. Student exposure to and use of the literacy tool, and quality of instruction and lesson delivery, were analyzed for their influence on students literacy outcomes. Implementation fidelity measures accounted for between 1.8% and 15% of the variance of intervention students scores. � 2014 Copyright � Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

U2 - 10.1080/00220671.2013.823369

DO - 10.1080/00220671.2013.823369

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 299

EP - 311

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 4

ER -